Reported Reactions

Drugs › Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent

Generic name

Epoetin alfa: adverse event reports filed with FDA

945 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2004–2026. Class: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent.

945
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 43 a year
43
reports, 12 months to June 2026
79 in the 12 months before
91.5%
marked serious by the reporter
78.3% across the class
15.3%
record death among outcomes, as reported
145 reports · not verified by FDA

945 adverse event reports received by FDA list epoetin alfa, a generic name as a suspect or interacting product, from June 2004 to June 2026. A further 2,161 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 43 reports listed it, down 46% from 79 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 43 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 1.4% of the reports for the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

Reporters most often recorded off label use (14.4%), anaemia (9.6%) and diarrhoea (7.9%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 306 different terms appear across these reports. Off label use is recorded in 14.4% of these reports, a larger share than in the median erythropoiesis-stimulating agent drug (3.9%).

91.5% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (78.3% across the class); 15.3% record death among the outcomes and 45.3% record hospitalisation, as reported. 42.6% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (23.3%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

0816Jul 2021: 8Aug 2021: 4Sep 2021: 10Oct 2021: 3Nov 2021: 15Dec 2021: 82022Jan 2022: 4Feb 2022: 4Mar 2022: 6Apr 2022: 13May 2022: 13Jun 2022: 8Jul 2022: 7Aug 2022: 3Sep 2022: 11Oct 2022: 1Nov 2022: 16Dec 2022: 52023Jan 2023: 6Feb 2023: 7Mar 2023: 5Apr 2023: 4May 2023: 6Jun 2023: 8Jul 2023: 3Aug 2023: 16Sep 2023: 4Oct 2023: 4Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 52024Jan 2024: 1Feb 2024: 5Mar 2024: 8Apr 2024: 2May 2024: 9Jun 2024: 4Jul 2024: 6Aug 2024: 3Sep 2024: 4Oct 2024: 5Nov 2024: 3Dec 2024: 92025Jan 2025: 14Feb 2025: 7Mar 2025: 9Apr 2025: 6May 2025: 6Jun 2025: 7Jul 2025: 4Aug 2025: 5Sep 2025: 3Oct 2025: 2Nov 2025: 6Dec 2025: 42026Jan 2026: 1Feb 2026: 4Mar 2026: 7Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 7

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

0601202004: 420042005: 82006: 52007: 1820072008: 42009: 62010: 820102011: 82012: 152013: 1520132014: 312015: 222016: 6320162017: 452018: 882019: 8620192020: 882021: 1202022: 9120222023: 692024: 592025: 7320252026: 19

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Epoetin alfa reports recording the termmedian drug in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent

  1. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label14.4%136
  2. Anaemialow red blood cells9.6%91
  3. Diarrhoealoose or frequent stools7.9%75
  4. Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term7.4%70
  5. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected6.8%64
  6. Hypotensionlow blood pressure5.7%54
  7. Aplasia pure red cell5.6%53
  8. Hospitalisationadmission to hospital4.6%43
  9. Abdominal painstomach or belly pain4.4%42
  10. Haemoglobin decreasedlow haemoglobin4.3%41
  11. Vomitingbeing sick4.3%41
  12. Anti-erythropoietin antibody negative3.8%36
  13. Hypersensitivityan allergic-type reaction3.6%34
  14. Device interaction3.4%32
  15. Thrombocytopenialow platelets3.4%32
  16. Hypertensionhigh blood pressure3.2%30
  17. Pneumonialung infection3.2%30
  18. Myocardial infarctionheart attack3%28
  19. Cardiac failureheart failure2.6%25
  20. Dyspnoeashortness of breath2.6%25
  21. Platelet count decreasedlow platelet count2.6%25
  22. Pyrexiafever2.6%25
  23. Nauseafeeling sick2.5%24
  24. Arteriovenous fistula site complication2.2%21
  25. Astheniaweakness or lack of energy2.2%21
  26. Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness2.2%21
  27. Urinary tract infectionbladder or urinary infection2.1%20
  28. Fatiguetiredness2%19
  29. Renal impairmentreduced kidney function1.9%18

Top 30 of 306 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 9 drugs in the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death15.3%145
Life-threatening10.9%103
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)45.3%428
Disability1.2%11
Congenital anomaly0%0
Other serious67.2%635
Not serious8.5%80

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 66,386 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 21.2%11
2 to 111.3%12
12 to 170.4%4
18 to 4410.7%101
45 to 6423.3%220
65 to 7416%151
75 and over16.1%152
Age not given31.1%294

Patient sex

Female36.3%343
Male38.4%363
Not given25.3%239

Who reported

Physician39.2%370
Pharmacist9.1%86
Other health professional42.6%403
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional8.5%80
Not given0.6%6

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 38.1% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Anaemia17518.5%
Nephrogenic anaemia13914.7%
Myelodysplastic syndrome242.5%
Chronic kidney disease151.6%
Mantle cell lymphoma91%
Prophylaxis80.8%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 945 reports.

Drugs most often listed in the same reports

Drug (any role in the report)ReportsShare of Epoetin alfa reports
Darbepoetin alfa15516.4%
Aspirin889.3%
Pantoprazole818.6%
Dexamethasone768%
Furosemide737.7%
Allopurinol727.6%
Filgrastim636.7%
Rituximab626.6%
Calcium carbonate606.3%
Iron576%

Other products listed in reports where Epoetin alfa is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.

In context

MeasureEpoetin alfaErythropoiesis-stimulating agentAll reports
Reports as suspect product94566,38620,646,523
Share of that pool—1.4%0%
Reports, latest 12 months43—1,332,454
Marked serious91.5%78.3%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports15334091
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports453342213
Consumer-filed share8.5%22.3%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsOff label use 14.4%median 3.9%4.1%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Aranespbrand37,27782688.2%
Mircerabrand8,86528165.8%
Procritbrand8,2246657%
Epogenbrand4,3172741.8%
Darbepoetin alfageneric3,77029993.6%
Retacritbrand1,42910661%
Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin betageneric911199.7%
Erythropoietingeneric6486497.2%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Epoetin alfa reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Epoetin alfa?

945 reports list Epoetin alfa as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 43 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 2,161 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Epoetin alfa reports?

off label use (14.4%), anaemia (9.6%), diarrhoea (7.9%), death (7.4%) and cerebrovascular accident (7.1%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Epoetin alfa was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

91.5% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 15.3% of reports include death and 45.3% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

other health professional (42.6%), physician (39.2%) and pharmacist (9.1%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Epoetin alfa rising?

43 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 46% from 79 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Epoetin alfa was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Epoetin alfa?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Epoetin alfa as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (2,161) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.