Reported Reactions

Drugs › Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent

Generic name

Erythropoietin: adverse event reports filed with FDA

648 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2004–2026. Class: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent.

648
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 30 a year
64
reports, 12 months to June 2026
100 in the 12 months before
97.2%
marked serious by the reporter
78.3% across the class
13.3%
record death among outcomes, as reported
86 reports · not verified by FDA

648 adverse event reports received by FDA list erythropoietin, a generic name as a suspect or interacting product, from September 2004 to June 2026. A further 4,671 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 64 reports listed it, down 36% from 100 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 30 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 1% of the reports for the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

Reporters most often recorded foetal exposure during pregnancy (11.4%), off label use (11.4%) and drug ineffective (10%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 187 different terms appear across these reports. Foetal exposure during pregnancy is recorded in 11.4% of these reports, a larger share than in the median erythropoiesis-stimulating agent drug (0.1%).

97.2% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (78.3% across the class); 13.3% record death among the outcomes and 40.9% record hospitalisation, as reported. 50.5% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (20.2%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

0918Jul 2021: 4Aug 2021: 3Sep 2021: 10Oct 2021: 6Nov 2021: 3Dec 2021: 92022Jan 2022: 3Feb 2022: 7Mar 2022: 4Apr 2022: 3May 2022: 3Jun 2022: 18Jul 2022: 2Aug 2022: 9Sep 2022: 6Oct 2022: 2Nov 2022: 6Dec 2022: 62023Jan 2023: 2Feb 2023: 8Mar 2023: 3Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 13Jun 2023: 3Jul 2023: 4Aug 2023: 8Sep 2023: 6Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 7Dec 2023: 62024Jan 2024: 17Feb 2024: 11Mar 2024: 4Apr 2024: 4May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 4Jul 2024: 2Aug 2024: 6Sep 2024: 17Oct 2024: 15Nov 2024: 7Dec 2024: 172025Jan 2025: 3Feb 2025: 7Mar 2025: 7Apr 2025: 9May 2025: 5Jun 2025: 5Jul 2025: 8Aug 2025: 13Sep 2025: 4Oct 2025: 4Nov 2025: 10Dec 2025: 112026Jan 2026: 3Feb 2026: 1Mar 2026: 2Apr 2026: 4May 2026: 2Jun 2026: 2

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

0531052004: 120042005: 22006: 22007: 220072008: 52009: 32010: 220102011: 32012: 52013: 520132014: 232015: 102016: 1120162017: 112018: 412019: 7320192020: 632021: 512022: 6920222023: 612024: 1052025: 8620252026: 14

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Erythropoietin reports recording the termmedian drug in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent

  1. Foetal exposure during pregnancythe unborn baby was exposed to the medicine11.4%74
  2. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label11.4%74
  3. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected10%65
  4. Premature babya baby born early9.1%59
  5. Anaemialow red blood cells8.6%56
  6. Maternal exposure during pregnancythe mother took the medicine during pregnancy6.5%42
  7. Thrombocytopenialow platelets6%39
  8. Product use in unapproved indicationused for a purpose not on the label5.9%38
  9. Neutropenialow neutrophils, a type of white blood cell5.6%36
  10. Disease progressionthe disease advanced4.5%29
  11. Exposure during pregnancythe medicine was taken during pregnancy4.3%28
  12. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma refractory3.5%23
  13. Haemoglobin decreasedlow haemoglobin3.4%22
  14. Face oedemaswelling of the face2.8%18
  15. Febrile bone marrow aplasia2.8%18
  16. Pruritusitching2.8%18
  17. Rashskin rash2.8%18
  18. Oedema peripheralswelling of the legs, ankles or hands2.6%17
  19. Drug interactionan interaction between medicines2.5%16
  20. Dysuriapain on passing urine2.5%16
  21. Iron overload2.5%16
  22. Acquired haemophilia2.3%15

Top 30 of 187 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 9 drugs in the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death13.3%86
Life-threatening8%52
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)40.9%265
Disability1.1%7
Congenital anomaly1.4%9
Other serious72.8%472
Not serious2.8%18

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 66,386 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20.6%4
2 to 110.3%2
12 to 170.6%4
18 to 4417%110
45 to 6420.2%131
65 to 7413.4%87
75 and over13.6%88
Age not given34.3%222

Patient sex

Female45.1%292
Male35.3%229
Not given19.6%127

Who reported

Physician33.2%215
Pharmacist8.8%57
Other health professional50.5%327
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional6%39
Not given1.5%10

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 10.2% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Anaemia15323.6%
Myelodysplastic syndrome223.4%
Aplasia pure red cell142.2%
Foetal exposure during pregnancy111.7%
Nephrogenic anaemia101.5%
Transplant failure101.5%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 648 reports.

In context

MeasureErythropoietinErythropoiesis-stimulating agentAll reports
Reports as suspect product64866,38620,646,523
Share of that pool—1%0%
Reports, latest 12 months64—1,332,454
Marked serious97.2%78.3%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports13334091
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports409342213
Consumer-filed share6%22.3%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsFoetal exposure during pregnancy 11.4%median 0.1%0.4%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Aranespbrand37,27782688.2%
Mircerabrand8,86528165.8%
Procritbrand8,2246657%
Epogenbrand4,3172741.8%
Darbepoetin alfageneric3,77029993.6%
Retacritbrand1,42910661%
Epoetin alfageneric9454391.5%
Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin betageneric911199.7%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Erythropoietin reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Erythropoietin?

648 reports list Erythropoietin as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 64 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 4,671 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Erythropoietin reports?

foetal exposure during pregnancy (11.4%), off label use (11.4%), drug ineffective (10%), premature baby (9.1%) and anaemia (8.6%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Erythropoietin was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

97.2% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 13.3% of reports include death and 40.9% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

other health professional (50.5%), physician (33.2%) and pharmacist (8.8%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Erythropoietin rising?

64 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 36% from 100 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Erythropoietin was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Erythropoietin?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Erythropoietin as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (4,671) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.