Reported Reactions

Drugs › Lipid-based polyene antifungal

Generic name

Amphotericin b liposome: adverse event reports filed with FDA

2,092 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2011–2021. Class: Lipid-based polyene antifungal.

2,092
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 142 a year
0
reports, 12 months to June 2026
0 in the 12 months before
99.1%
marked serious by the reporter
97.9% across the class
56.8%
record death among outcomes, as reported
1,189 reports · not verified by FDA

2,092 adverse event reports received by FDA list amphotericin b liposome, a generic name as a suspect or interacting product, from October 2011 to September 2021. A further 272 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 0 reports listed it, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 142 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 24.3% of the reports for the lipid-based polyene antifungal class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

The reactions recorded most often are drug ineffective (48.6%), off label use (16.5%) and death (5.2%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 343 different terms appear across these reports. Drug ineffective is recorded in 48.6% of these reports, about the same share as in the median lipid-based polyene antifungal drug (43.4%).

99.1% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (97.9% across the class); 56.8% record death among the outcomes and 21.6% record hospitalisation, as reported. 79.5% of the reports came from consumers, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (26.2%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

02141Jul 2021: 26Aug 2021: 34Sep 2021: 41Oct 2021: 0Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 0Aug 2022: 0Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 0Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 0Jun 2024: 0Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 0Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 0Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 0Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

02344672011: 320112013: 820132014: 12120142015: 6820152016: 8720162017: 17620172018: 46720182019: 42520192020: 36220202021: 3752021

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Amphotericin b liposome reports recording the termmedian drug in lipid-based polyene antifungal

  1. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected48.6%1,017
  2. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label16.5%346
  3. Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term5.2%108
  4. Acute kidney injurysudden loss of kidney function4.1%86
  5. Hypokalaemialow blood potassium3.9%81
  6. Pyrexiafever3.3%70
  7. Treatment failurethe treatment did not work2.9%60
  8. Multiple organ dysfunction syndromeseveral organs failing2.7%56
  9. Pancytopenialow counts of all blood cells2.6%54
  10. Renal impairmentreduced kidney function2.4%51
  11. Renal failurekidney failure2.2%45
  12. Blood creatinine increasedraised creatinine, a kidney test2.1%44
  13. Fungal infectiona fungal infection1.9%39
  14. Septic shockshock arising from infection1.8%38
  15. Respiratory failurethe lungs could not supply enough oxygen1.7%35
  16. Pneumonialung infection1.5%32
  17. Vomitingbeing sick1.5%32
  18. Dyspnoeashortness of breath1.5%31
  19. Condition aggravatedthe condition being treated got worse1.4%29
  20. Drug interactionan interaction between medicines1.2%26
  21. Mucormycosis1.2%26
  22. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome1.2%25
  23. Nauseafeeling sick1.2%25
  24. Product use in unapproved indicationused for a purpose not on the label1.2%25
  25. Product use issuea problem in how the product was used1.2%25
  26. Sepsisa severe body-wide response to infection1.2%25

Top 30 of 343 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 2 drugs in the lipid-based polyene antifungal class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death56.8%1,189
Life-threatening5.6%117
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)21.6%451
Disability0.6%12
Congenital anomaly0.1%3
Other serious87%1,819
Not serious0.9%19

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 8,609 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 22.1%44
2 to 115.9%124
12 to 175.1%107
18 to 4422.2%465
45 to 6426.2%548
65 to 7413.1%275
75 and over8.3%173
Age not given17%356

Patient sex

Female32.3%676
Male54.4%1,139
Not given13.2%277

Who reported

Physician4.1%85
Pharmacist0.7%15
Other health professional15.6%327
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional79.5%1,664
Not given0%1

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 11.4% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Mucormycosis1979.4%
Fungal infection1617.7%
Aspergillus infection1577.5%
Candida infection944.5%
Meningitis cryptococcal793.8%
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis773.7%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 2,092 reports.

Drugs most often listed in the same reports

Drug (any role in the report)ReportsShare of Amphotericin b liposome reports
Voriconazole40319.3%
Fluconazole26612.7%
Meropenem21510.3%
Vancomycin1627.7%
Caspofungin1557.4%
Posaconazole1346.4%
Tacrolimus1125.4%
Methylprednisolone1065.1%
Prednisone954.5%
Micafungin914.3%

Other products listed in reports where Amphotericin b liposome is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.

In context

MeasureAmphotericin b liposomeLipid-based polyene antifungalAll reports
Reports as suspect product2,0928,60920,646,523
Share of that pool—24.3%0%
Reports, latest 12 months0—1,332,454
Marked serious99.1%97.9%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports56846491
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports216358213
Consumer-filed share79.5%24.1%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsDrug ineffective 48.6%median 43.4%6.3%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the lipid-based polyene antifungal class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Amphotericin bgeneric6,51787297.5%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Amphotericin b liposome reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Amphotericin b liposome?

2,092 reports list Amphotericin b liposome as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 0 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 272 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Amphotericin b liposome reports?

drug ineffective (48.6%), off label use (16.5%), death (5.2%), acute kidney injury (4.1%) and hypokalaemia (3.9%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Amphotericin b liposome was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

99.1% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 56.8% of reports include death and 21.6% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

consumer or non-health professional (79.5%), other health professional (15.6%) and physician (4.1%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Amphotericin b liposome rising?

0 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Amphotericin b liposome was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Amphotericin b liposome?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Amphotericin b liposome as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (272) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.