Devices › Device types
FDA product code KRD · class 2 · Cardiovascular
Device, vascular, for promoting embolization: medical device reports filed with FDA
14,553 reports carry this product code, 1992–2026; 30 brands with a page.
- 14,553
- reports with this product code
- 0.1% of all MAUDE reports
- 1,671
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 1,580 in the 12 months before
- 74.9%
- classified as malfunction
- 62.3% across all reports
- 1.6%
- classified as death, as reported
- 0.9% across all reports
Product code KRD is FDA's classification for "Device, vascular, for promoting embolization" (cardiovascular panel), a class 2 device. 14,553 medical device reports carry this product code, 0.1% of the MAUDE database, from June 1992 to August 2026.
1,671 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, close to the 1,580 of the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (74.9%), injury (22.9%) and death (1.6%). 30 brand names with a page on this site carry this code; the brands table is ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Brands with this product code
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death | Classified as malfunction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axium Prime Brpl 3d | 902 | 135 | 1% | 91.5% |
| Concerto Nylon | 900 | 160 | 2.6% | 91.9% |
| Interlock? | 688 | 37 | 0% | 81.3% |
| Interlock-35 | 626 | 2 | 0.2% | 92.3% |
| Axium Prime Brpl Hlx | 616 | 106 | 1% | 90.6% |
| Interlock?-35 | 542 | 94 | 2.2% | 79.7% |
| Axium 3d | 429 | 48 | 1.6% | 90% |
| AZUR CX 35 Detachable | 385 | 58 | 0% | 76% |
| Axium Framing Coil | 282 | 57 | 0% | 93% |
| Azur CX Detachable | 278 | 38 | 0% | 78.8% |
| Concerto Pgla Hlx | 247 | 54 | 0.8% | 91.5% |
| Axium Helix | 231 | 24 | 3% | 81% |
| Retracta Detachable Embolization Coil | 228 | 20 | 0.9% | 78.9% |
| Microvascular Plug | 164 | 11 | 0.6% | 53.9% |
| Axium Prime Bare Pl 3d | 150 | 27 | 0% | 92% |
| Concerto | 78 | 199 | 2.7% | 62.8% |
| Axium | 74 | 14 | 13.1% | 29.6% |
| Uterine Artery Embolization | 70 | 0 | 1.1% | 0% |
| Dc Bead | 40 | 1 | 26.5% | 0.7% |
| Penumbra Coil 400 | 15 | 0 | 0.9% | 78% |
| Ruby Coil | 12 | 26 | 0.1% | 95.2% |
| Xtrasoft Orbit Galaxy Detachable Coil | 5 | 0 | 1.3% | 66% |
| Orbit Galaxy Detachable Coil System | 4 | 0 | 0.4% | 72.9% |
| Rx Accunet Embolic Protection System | 3 | 0 | 2.1% | 14% |
| Boston Scientific | 1 | 5 | 3.3% | 55% |
| Cathera | 1 | 0 | 7.3% | 66.1% |
| Deltaplush - Cerecyte Microcoil | 1 | 0 | 0.3% | 90.8% |
| Rebar | 1 | 108 | 9% | 62.8% |
| Terumo | 1 | 0 | 2.8% | 12.2% |
| Therasphere | 1 | 0 | 34.8% | 0.5% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Manufacturers named
| Manufacturer (as written on reports) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Medos International Sarl | 2,655 | 18.2% |
| Micro Therapeutics Ev3 | 2,398 | 16.5% |
| Microvention | 1,803 | 12.4% |
| Medtronic Mexico S De R L De Cv | 887 | 6.1% |
| Boston Scientific - Cork | 860 | 5.9% |
| Covidien Irvine | 687 | 4.7% |
| Medtronic Mexico | 406 | 2.8% |
| Cook | 368 | 2.5% |
| Aga Medical | 210 | 1.4% |
| Penumbra | 145 | 1% |
| Codman And Shurtleff | 73 | 0.5% |
| William Cook Europe | 49 | 0.3% |
| Abbott Medical | 47 | 0.3% |
| Covidien Medical Products | 20 | 0.1% |
| Clearstream Technologies | 16 | 0.1% |
Reports by month, five years
FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
Event type and report source
Event type
Who filed
Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Separation failure | 2,729 | 18.8% |
| Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off | 1,830 | 12.6% |
| Stretched | 1,612 | 11.1% |
| Physical resistance/sticking | 1,356 | 9.3% |
| Failure to advance | 985 | 6.8% |
| Premature separation | 972 | 6.7% |
| Breakthe device broke | 913 | 6.3% |
| Detachment of device component | 559 | 3.8% |
| Material deformation | 511 | 3.5% |
| Entrapment of device | 498 | 3.4% |
| Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed | 488 | 3.4% |
| Difficult to advance | 479 | 3.3% |
| Premature activation | 449 | 3.1% |
| Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove | 441 | 3% |
| Migration or expulsion of device | 437 | 3% |
| Unraveled material | 286 | 2% |
| Positioning problem | 254 | 1.7% |
| Material twisted/bent | 239 | 1.6% |
| Material protrusion/extrusion | 218 | 1.5% |
| Material separation | 198 | 1.4% |
Questions about device, vascular, for promoting embolization reports
What is product code KRD?
FDA's classification code for "Device, vascular, for promoting embolization", class 2, reviewed by the cardiovascular panel. Every device report carries the product code of the device involved.
How many reports carry this code?
14,553 reports through August 2026, 1,671 of them in the latest 12 months.
Which brands appear most often?
Axium Prime Brpl 3d (902), Concerto Nylon (900), Interlock? (688), Interlock-35 (626) and Axium Prime Brpl Hlx (616). Widely used products collect more reports because more people use them.
Can the brands table be used to rank the devices?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." Brands differ in how many are in use, how long they have been sold and how reports are collected.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.