MedDRA preferred term · the product tasted odd

Product taste abnormal: adverse event reports recording this term

13,272 reports to FDA record it, 2008–2026; 0.1% of the database.

Read first · FDA's statement on these data

Adverse event reports submitted to FDA do not undergo extensive validation or verification. Therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report. While a suspected relationship may exist, it is not medically validated and should not be the sole source of information for clinical decision making or other assumptions about the safety or efficacy of a product. Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product. openFDA, FDA

FDA adds: "There is no certainty that the reported event (adverse event or medication error) was actually due to the product. FDA does not require that a causal relationship between a product and event be proven, and reports do not always contain enough detail to properly evaluate an event." The information in these reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated.

Not medical advice. This site counts what was reported to FDA. Questions about a medicine or device belong with a pharmacist or clinician.

13,272
reports recording the term: 0.1% of all reports; 994
reports, 12 months to June 2026: 818 in the 12 months before; 17.7%
marked serious by the reporter: 57.4% across all reports; 0.3%
record death among outcomes, as reported: 9.1% across all reports

13,272 reports in FDA's adverse event database record the MedDRA term "Product taste abnormal" (in plain words, the product tasted odd): 0.1% of all reports received between February 2008 and June 2026. Coders pick the term that best matches the reporter's description.

994 reports recorded it in the 12 months to June 2026, up 22% from 818 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Of reports recording this term, 17.7% are marked serious, 0.3% include death among the outcomes and 4.3% include hospitalisation, as reported.

The drugs listed most often as suspect products in those reports are MiraLAX, Paxlovid and Vascepa. That order mostly follows how many reports each drug has overall; the table also gives the term's share within each drug's own reports. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

Drugs listed as suspect products in these reports

Drug	Class	Reports with this term	Share of the drug's own reports
MiraLAX	Osmotic laxative	659	1.7%
Paxlovid	—	564	1.1%
Vascepa	—	439	10.6%
Symbicort	Corticosteroid	269	0.7%
Clarispray Nasal Allergy	—	207	12.4%
Advil	Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug	203	1%
Veltassa	—	184	1.4%
Xyrem	Central nervous system depressant	159	0.3%
Cholestyramine	—	150	9.2%
Albuterol sulfate	beta2-Adrenergic agonist	146	0.3%
Plenvu	—	119	14.9%
Proair Hfa	—	108	1.5%
Alprazolam	Benzodiazepine	100	0.2%
Tirosint-Sol	—	99	13.5%
Synthroid	l-Thyroxine	97	0.4%
Gabapentin	Anti-epileptic agent	93	0.1%
Levetiracetam	—	93	0.2%
Tudorza Pressair	Anticholinergic	82	2.1%
Metformin hydrochloride	Biguanide	79	0.3%
Dulera	Corticosteroid	76	1%
Allegra	—	74	0.6%
Pulmicort Flexhaler	Corticosteroid	74	1.7%
Xiidra	—	73	0.5%
Aleve	Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug	72	0.1%
Clonazepam	Benzodiazepine	72	0.2%

Drugs with a page on this site, ordered by the number of their reports recording this term. The last column is the term's share within that drug's own reports, against 0.1% across the whole database. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

By pharmacologic class

Class	Reports with this term	Share of class reports	Median drug in class
Corticosteroid	780	0.1%	0%
Osmotic laxative	700	0.5%	0%
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug	541	0.1%	0%
Benzodiazepine	309	0.1%	0%
Anticholinergic	244	0.2%	0%
beta2-Adrenergic agonist	235	0.3%	0.1%
Opioid agonist	222	0%	0%
Proton pump inhibitor	199	0%	0%
l-Thyroxine	183	0.4%	0.4%
Central nervous system depressant	178	0.2%	0.2%

Classes ordered by count. Class shares follow the class's overall report volume as much as anything else.

Patients in these reports

Patient age

Under 20.4%49

2 to 113.1%413

12 to 170.8%106

18 to 449.3%1,231

45 to 6416.6%2,200

65 to 7411%1,464

75 and over7.4%980

Age not given51.5%6,829

Patient sex

Female56.5%7,504

Male27.2%3,610

Not given16.3%2,158

Grey bar: all 20,646,523 reports in the database. 93.7% of these reports give the United States as the country.

Questions about "Product taste abnormal"

What does "Product taste abnormal" mean in an adverse event report?

In plain language: the product tasted odd. It is a MedDRA preferred term, the dictionary FDA uses to code what a reporter described. The report's own description is not published by openFDA and is not shown here.

How many reports record product taste abnormal?

13,272 reports through June 2026 (0.1% of all reports), 994 of them in the latest 12 months.

Which drugs appear most often in these reports?

MiraLAX (659), Paxlovid (564), Vascepa (439), Symbicort (269) and Clarispray Nasal Allergy (207). Drugs with many reports overall lead almost every term's list. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Does a drug appearing here mean it was responsible for this reaction?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

I have this symptom. What should I do?

This site cannot assess anyone. A pharmacist or clinician can; for an emergency, call the local emergency number. Nothing on this page is medical advice.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. Terms are pooled across spelling and capitalisation variants of one MedDRA preferred term. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.