Reported Reactions

Drugs › Rifamycin antibacterial

Generic name

Rifaximin: adverse event reports filed with FDA

942 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2004–2026. Class: Rifamycin antibacterial.

942
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 43 a year
168
reports, 12 months to June 2026
113 in the 12 months before
95.2%
marked serious by the reporter
80.7% across the class
20.3%
record death among outcomes, as reported
191 reports · not verified by FDA

942 adverse event reports received by FDA list rifaximin, a generic name as a suspect or interacting product, from September 2004 to June 2026. A further 2,779 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 168 reports listed it, up 49% from 113 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 43 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 3.9% of the reports for the rifamycin antibacterial class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

The MedDRA terms listed most often are drug ineffective (19.2%), off label use (7%) and diarrhoea (6.5%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 251 different terms appear across these reports. Drug ineffective is recorded in 19.2% of these reports, a larger share than in the median rifamycin antibacterial drug (12.1%).

95.2% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (80.7% across the class); 20.3% record death among the outcomes and 47.9% record hospitalisation, as reported. 39.5% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (31.1%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

01836Jul 2021: 2Aug 2021: 0Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 5Nov 2021: 36Dec 2021: 142022Jan 2022: 9Feb 2022: 7Mar 2022: 10Apr 2022: 6May 2022: 13Jun 2022: 12Jul 2022: 19Aug 2022: 9Sep 2022: 6Oct 2022: 5Nov 2022: 8Dec 2022: 62023Jan 2023: 11Feb 2023: 14Mar 2023: 21Apr 2023: 8May 2023: 13Jun 2023: 18Jul 2023: 12Aug 2023: 10Sep 2023: 15Oct 2023: 2Nov 2023: 11Dec 2023: 32024Jan 2024: 10Feb 2024: 4Mar 2024: 8Apr 2024: 21May 2024: 5Jun 2024: 2Jul 2024: 15Aug 2024: 19Sep 2024: 9Oct 2024: 12Nov 2024: 4Dec 2024: 42025Jan 2025: 15Feb 2025: 7Mar 2025: 2Apr 2025: 8May 2025: 13Jun 2025: 5Jul 2025: 13Aug 2025: 11Sep 2025: 9Oct 2025: 10Nov 2025: 8Dec 2025: 142026Jan 2026: 30Feb 2026: 21Mar 2026: 19Apr 2026: 17May 2026: 7Jun 2026: 9

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

0691382004: 420042005: 12007: 12008: 520082009: 12010: 22011: 920112012: 42013: 62014: 3020142015: 172016: 192017: 3420172018: 672019: 382020: 4620202021: 792022: 1102023: 13820232024: 1132025: 1152026: 1032026

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Rifaximin reports recording the termmedian drug in rifamycin antibacterial

  1. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected19.2%181
  2. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label7%66
  3. Diarrhoealoose or frequent stools6.5%61
  4. Pneumonialung infection6.2%58
  5. Condition aggravatedthe condition being treated got worse4.8%45
  6. Drug interactionan interaction between medicines4.6%43
  7. Rhabdomyolysismuscle breakdown4.5%42
  8. Pancreatitisinflammation of the pancreas3.9%37
  9. Quality of life decreasedreduced quality of life3.7%35
  10. Intentional product use issuedeliberate use not as intended3.4%32
  11. Multiple organ dysfunction syndromeseveral organs failing3.4%32
  12. Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term3.3%31
  13. Headachehead pain3.1%29
  14. Vomitingbeing sick2.8%26
  15. Hospitalisationadmission to hospital2.7%25
  16. Renal failurekidney failure2.7%25
  17. Gastrointestinal bacterial overgrowth2.5%24
  18. Anaemialow red blood cells2.3%22
  19. Drug specific antibody2.3%22
  20. Leukopenialow white blood cells2.3%22
  21. Confusional stateconfusion2.2%21
  22. Product use in unapproved indicationused for a purpose not on the label2.2%21

Top 30 of 251 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 3 drugs in the rifamycin antibacterial class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death20.3%191
Life-threatening10.3%97
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)47.9%451
Disability3.1%29
Congenital anomaly0.1%1
Other serious55.7%525
Not serious4.8%45

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 24,161 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20.4%4
2 to 112%19
12 to 170.8%8
18 to 4422.1%208
45 to 6431.1%293
65 to 7422%207
75 and over8.9%84
Age not given12.6%119

Patient sex

Female47.7%449
Male44.4%418
Not given8%75

Who reported

Physician28.8%271
Pharmacist10.9%103
Other health professional39.5%372
Lawyer0.1%1
Consumer or non-health professional19.1%180
Not given1.6%15

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 34.2% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Hepatic encephalopathy17818.9%
Hyperammonaemia343.6%
Diarrhoea171.8%
Encephalopathy171.8%
Hepatic encephalopathy prophylaxis161.7%
Hepatic cirrhosis141.5%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 942 reports.

Drugs most often listed in the same reports

Drug (any role in the report)ReportsShare of Rifaximin reports
Lactulose24726.2%
Metronidazole909.6%
Furosemide818.6%
Spironolactone768.1%
Vancomycin717.5%
Methotrexate596.3%
Methylprednisolone596.3%
Infliximab535.6%
Ciprofloxacin515.4%
Adalimumab444.7%

Other products listed in reports where Rifaximin is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.

In context

MeasureRifaximinRifamycin antibacterialAll reports
Reports as suspect product94224,16120,646,523
Share of that pool—3.9%0%
Reports, latest 12 months168—1,332,454
Marked serious95.2%80.7%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports20325491
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports479375213
Consumer-filed share19.1%48.5%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsDrug ineffective 19.2%median 12.1%6.3%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the rifamycin antibacterial class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Xifaxanbrand13,99595077%
Rifampingeneric9,2241,36784.8%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Rifaximin reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Rifaximin?

942 reports list Rifaximin as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 168 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 2,779 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Rifaximin reports?

drug ineffective (19.2%), off label use (7%), diarrhoea (6.5%), pneumonia (6.2%) and condition aggravated (4.8%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Rifaximin was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

95.2% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 20.3% of reports include death and 47.9% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

other health professional (39.5%), physician (28.8%) and consumer or non-health professional (19.1%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Rifaximin rising?

168 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, up 49% from 113 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Rifaximin was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Rifaximin?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Rifaximin as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (2,779) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.