Reported Reactions

Drugs › Vitamin C

Generic name

Ascorbic acid: adverse event reports filed with FDA

2,233 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2004–2026. Class: Vitamin C. Also reported as Ascorbic Acid Injection Usp, Ascorbic Acid 500mg.

2,233
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 99 a year
156
reports, 12 months to June 2026
336 in the 12 months before
95.1%
marked serious by the reporter
94.4% across the class
31.7%
record death among outcomes, as reported
707 reports · not verified by FDA

Between January 2004 and June 2026, 2,233 adverse event reports received by FDA list ascorbic acid, a generic name as a suspect or interacting product. Reports that mention it only as a concomitant medication (20,988) are left out of every figure here.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 156 reports listed it, down 54% from 336 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 99 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 25.4% of the reports for the vitamin C class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

The MedDRA terms listed most often are off label use (30.3%), drug ineffective (24.9%) and fatigue (22.7%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 729 different terms appear across these reports. Off label use is recorded in 30.3% of these reports, about the same share as in the median vitamin C drug (30.3%).

95.1% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (94.4% across the class); 31.7% record death among the outcomes and 63.4% record hospitalisation, as reported. 61% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (25.8%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

03569Jul 2021: 18Aug 2021: 9Sep 2021: 14Oct 2021: 33Nov 2021: 21Dec 2021: 212022Jan 2022: 33Feb 2022: 16Mar 2022: 13Apr 2022: 32May 2022: 7Jun 2022: 12Jul 2022: 8Aug 2022: 20Sep 2022: 22Oct 2022: 18Nov 2022: 12Dec 2022: 252023Jan 2023: 18Feb 2023: 13Mar 2023: 14Apr 2023: 38May 2023: 24Jun 2023: 17Jul 2023: 21Aug 2023: 38Sep 2023: 28Oct 2023: 30Nov 2023: 19Dec 2023: 262024Jan 2024: 26Feb 2024: 33Mar 2024: 25Apr 2024: 44May 2024: 69Jun 2024: 43Jul 2024: 61Aug 2024: 36Sep 2024: 42Oct 2024: 44Nov 2024: 24Dec 2024: 322025Jan 2025: 18Feb 2025: 16Mar 2025: 17Apr 2025: 17May 2025: 2Jun 2025: 27Jul 2025: 8Aug 2025: 8Sep 2025: 16Oct 2025: 14Nov 2025: 11Dec 2025: 162026Jan 2026: 12Feb 2026: 12Mar 2026: 10Apr 2026: 17May 2026: 13Jun 2026: 19

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

02404792004: 2920042005: 212006: 172007: 2120072008: 232009: 502010: 1120102011: 272012: 302013: 2420132014: 332015: 172016: 4820162017: 392018: 912019: 14020192020: 1662021: 2102022: 21820222023: 2862024: 4792025: 17020252026: 83

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Ascorbic acid reports recording the termmedian drug in vitamin c

  1. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label30.3%677
  2. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected24.9%556
  3. Fatiguetiredness22.7%506
  4. Painpain, site not specified21.5%479
  5. Rheumatoid arthritisrheumatoid arthritis, an inflammatory joint disease21%468
  6. Hypertensionhigh blood pressure19.1%426
  7. Rashskin rash19.1%426
  8. Nauseafeeling sick18.9%422
  9. Headachehead pain18.8%420
  10. Joint swellinga swollen joint18.6%416
  11. Vomitingbeing sick18.5%412
  12. Drug hypersensitivityan allergic-type reaction to a medicine18.4%411
  13. Condition aggravatedthe condition being treated got worse18.3%409
  14. Infusion related reactiona reaction during or soon after an infusion17.6%394
  15. Hypersensitivityan allergic-type reaction16.9%377
  16. Dyspnoeashortness of breath16.7%372
  17. General physical health deteriorationgeneral decline in health16.4%367
  18. Arthropathy16.4%366
  19. Pyrexiafever16.1%360
  20. Swellingswelling16%358
  21. Abdominal discomfortstomach discomfort15.7%350
  22. Systemic lupus erythematosuslupus, an autoimmune disease15.7%350
  23. Hepatic enzyme increasedraised liver enzymes15.6%349
  24. Fibromyalgia15.5%347
  25. Arthralgiajoint pain15.4%343
  26. Drug intolerancethe medicine was not tolerated14.8%330

Top 30 of 729 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 3 drugs in the vitamin c class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death31.7%707
Life-threatening30.2%674
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)63.4%1,415
Disability30.4%679
Congenital anomaly10.6%237
Other serious77.8%1,737
Not serious4.9%109

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 8,783 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20.3%6
2 to 112%44
12 to 170.9%21
18 to 4424.2%541
45 to 6425.8%576
65 to 746.6%147
75 and over11.3%253
Age not given28.9%645

Patient sex

Female59%1,317
Male26.1%583
Not given14.9%333

Who reported

Physician18.8%419
Pharmacist3.5%79
Other health professional61%1,363
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional14.7%328
Not given2%44

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 20% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Constipation652.9%
Covid-19472.1%
Rheumatoid arthritis442%
Multiple myeloma321.4%
Vitamin supplementation241.1%
Acute myeloid leukaemia200.9%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 2,233 reports.

Drugs most often listed in the same reports

Drug (any role in the report)ReportsShare of Ascorbic acid reports
Prednisone91941.2%
Folic acid89840.2%
Ergocalciferol74133.2%
Acetaminophen71632.1%
Humira63128.3%
Diclofenac sodium61527.5%
Hydroxychloroquine60827.2%
Orencia60026.9%
Enbrel59926.8%
Methotrexate59826.8%

Other products listed in reports where Ascorbic acid is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.

In context

MeasureAscorbic acidVitamin CAll reports
Reports as suspect product2,2338,78320,646,523
Share of that pool—25.4%0%
Reports, latest 12 months156—1,332,454
Marked serious95.1%94.4%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports31740791
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports634600213
Consumer-filed share14.7%13.7%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsOff label use 30.3%median 30.3%4.1%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the vitamin c class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Vitamin cgeneric5,7141,03195.1%
Vitamin egeneric8366987.6%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Ascorbic acid reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Ascorbic acid?

2,233 reports list Ascorbic acid as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 156 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 20,988 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Ascorbic acid reports?

off label use (30.3%), drug ineffective (24.9%), fatigue (22.7%), pain (21.5%) and rheumatoid arthritis (21%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Ascorbic acid was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

95.1% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 31.7% of reports include death and 63.4% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

other health professional (61%), physician (18.8%) and consumer or non-health professional (14.7%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Ascorbic acid rising?

156 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 54% from 336 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Ascorbic acid was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Ascorbic acid?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Ascorbic acid as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (20,988) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.