Product name as reported
Periogard: adverse event reports filed with FDA
4,007 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2010–2026.
- 4,007
- reports as suspect product
- 0% of all reports · about 248 a year
- 618
- reports, 12 months to June 2026
- 838 in the 12 months before
- 98.9%
- marked serious by the reporter
- 57.4% across all reports
- 46.9%
- record death among outcomes, as reported
- 1,879 reports · not verified by FDA
4,007 adverse event reports received by FDA list the product name "Periogard" as reporters wrote it as a suspect or interacting product, from May 2010 to June 2026. A further 537 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.
In the 12 months to June 2026, 618 reports listed it, down 26% from 838 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 248 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.
The reactions recorded most often are rash (61.6%), joint swelling (60.8%) and lower respiratory tract infection (58.8%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 390 different terms appear across these reports. Rash is recorded in 61.6% of these reports, against 2.1% of all reports in the database.
98.9% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter; 46.9% record death among the outcomes and 60.8% record hospitalisation, as reported. 74.6% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is 18 to 44 (55.8%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.
By year received
2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.
Reactions recorded in the reports
share of Periogard reports recording the termall reports in the database
- Rashskin rash61.6%2,470
- Joint swellinga swollen joint60.8%2,438
- Lower respiratory tract infectiona chest infection58.8%2,357
- Folliculitis56.7%2,270
- Fatiguetiredness56.6%2,266
- Painpain, site not specified56.4%2,258
- Swellingswelling56.1%2,248
- Pruritusitching55.6%2,226
- Confusional stateconfusion55.3%2,217
- Impaired healingslow healing55.3%2,215
- Peripheral swellingswelling of the arms or legs54.9%2,198
- Stomatitissore mouth54.8%2,194
- Hypersensitivityan allergic-type reaction54.2%2,172
- Weight increasedweight gain54%2,163
- Dyspnoeashortness of breath53.1%2,129
- Sinusitissinus infection53.1%2,127
- Irritable bowel syndrome53%2,122
- Blistera blister52.3%2,097
- Nasopharyngitisa cold52%2,085
- Muscle injury52%2,083
- Arthralgiajoint pain51.9%2,081
- Gastrointestinal disorder51.5%2,065
- Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected51.1%2,049
- Pyrexiafever50.1%2,008
- Infectionan infection, type not specified49.1%1,967
- Synovitis48.3%1,936
- Ill-defined disordera condition that was not clearly described47.9%1,919
- Systemic lupus erythematosuslupus, an autoimmune disease47.4%1,900
- Glossodynia46.9%1,879
- Infusion related reactiona reaction during or soon after an infusion46.5%1,863
Top 30 of 390 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the share of all reports in the database; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."
Outcomes recorded
Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 20,646,523 reports. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."
Patients and reporters
Patient age
Patient sex
Who reported
Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 1.3% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.
Reason for use recorded
| Indication as recorded (MedDRA) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Foetal exposure during pregnancy | 85 | 2.1% |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 67 | 1.7% |
| Exposure during pregnancy | 35 | 0.9% |
| Gingival hypertrophy | 14 | 0.3% |
The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 4,007 reports.
Drugs most often listed in the same reports
| Drug (any role in the report) | Reports | Share of Periogard reports |
|---|---|---|
| Prednisone | 3,704 | 92.4% |
| Simponi | 3,699 | 92.3% |
| Actemra | 3,621 | 90.4% |
| Orencia | 3,595 | 89.7% |
| Methotrexate | 3,562 | 88.9% |
| Cimzia | 3,526 | 88% |
| Enbrel | 3,522 | 87.9% |
| Leflunomide | 3,499 | 87.3% |
| Acetaminophen | 3,483 | 86.9% |
| Arava | 3,196 | 79.8% |
Other products listed in reports where Periogard is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.
In context
| Measure | Periogard | All reports |
|---|---|---|
| Reports as suspect product | 4,007 | 20,646,523 |
| Share of that pool | — | 0% |
| Reports, latest 12 months | 618 | 1,332,454 |
| Marked serious | 98.9% | 57.4% |
| Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports | 469 | 91 |
| Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports | 608 | 213 |
| Consumer-filed share | 7.2% | 45.8% |
| Top term, share of reports | Rash 61.6% | 2.1% |
Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."
Questions about Periogard reports
How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Periogard?
4,007 reports list Periogard as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 618 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 537 list it only as a concomitant medication.
What reactions are recorded in Periogard reports?
rash (61.6%), joint swelling (60.8%), lower respiratory tract infection (58.8%), folliculitis (56.7%) and fatigue (56.6%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Periogard was responsible.
How serious are the reports?
98.9% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 46.9% of reports include death and 60.8% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.
Who files these reports?
other health professional (74.6%), physician (17.6%) and consumer or non-health professional (7.2%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.
Are reports for Periogard rising?
618 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 26% from 838 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.
Do these reports show that Periogard was responsible for these reactions?
No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.
Is this a list of the side effects of Periogard?
No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.
How do I report an adverse event?
Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Periogard as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (537) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.