G-Csf adverse event reports that FDA received
- Name type
- Product name as reported
What a report is
A report is not proof that the drug was the cause of the event.
FDA says:
Adverse event reports submitted to FDA do not undergo extensive validation or verification. Therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report. While a suspected relationship may exist, it is not medically validated and should not be the sole source of information for clinical decision making or other assumptions about the safety or efficacy of a product. Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product.
Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview, section "Responsible use of the data". The site read the page on . The data have the reports that FDA received through .
FDA also says:
There is no certainty that the reported event (adverse event or medication error) was actually due to the product. FDA does not require that a causal relationship between a product and event be proven, and reports do not always contain enough detail to properly evaluate an event. The information in these reports has not been scientifically or otherwise verified as to a cause and effect relationship and cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events.
Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .
Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated.
Source: openFDA, Response of the drug event API (meta.disclaimer). The site read the page on .
Not medical advice. This site counts what was reported to FDA. Questions about a medicine or device belong with a pharmacist or clinician.
Reports on file
From January 2004 to December 2020, FDA received 1,454 adverse event reports that name G-Csf. The name is as reporters wrote it. In these reports the drug is a suspect or interacting product.
In the same period, 1,814 further reports name it only as a concomitant medicine. The counts on this page do not include these reports.
FDA received no report that names G-Csf in the five years to June 2026. The latest report was received in December 2020.
The number of people who use the product is not in the data. A count is not a rate. A count of reports is not a count of events or of patients, because one event can have more than one report.
There are many instances of duplicative reports and some reports do not contain all the necessary information.
Source: FDA, FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) Public Dashboard. Content current as of . The site read the page on .
Suspect product
FDA records each drug in a report as suspect, concomitant or interacting. This page counts the reports in which G-Csf is suspect or interacting. FDA says:
Any number of the drugs may be marked as suspect if thought to be responsible for one or more of the reactions, but that information is not validated.
Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .
Data version
openFDA FAERS release of 1 Oct 2026. Reports received through 30 Jun 2026.
Since the last update
FDA says:
Many factors can influence whether or not an event will be reported, such as the time a product has been marketed and publicity about an event.
Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .
The information in these reports cannot be used to estimate the incidence (occurrence rates) of the events reported.
Source: FDA, FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) Public Dashboard. Content current as of . The site read the page on .
No update is on record for this page. The record starts when FDA adds the reports of July to September 2026.
FDA received no report that names G-Csf in April to June 2026, in January to March 2026 or in April to June 2025.
April to June 2026 is the latest closed quarter in the data. A closed quarter is a quarter for which the FDA files have most of the reports.
Reaction lookup
These are the reaction terms that the reports record, with the number of reports for each term. Type a term or a plain word to find its count.
What this list leaves out
The table lists the 195 reaction terms that 5 or more reports record. A term with fewer than 5 reports is not in the table.
The site keeps reaction terms for 1,444 of the 1,454 reports (99.3%).
The reports of the other years are not in the counts.
So a count in the table can be lower than the count of FDA.
The table shows the first 50 of 195 terms.
| Reaction term (MedDRA) and plain meaning | Reports | Share of the 1,454 reports |
|---|---|---|
| Febrile neutropeniafever with low white blood cells | 218 | 15% |
| Pyrexiafever | 147 | 10.1% |
| Neutropenialow neutrophils, a type of white blood cell | 133 | 9.1% |
| Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term | 94 | 6.5% |
| Nauseafeeling sick | 86 | 5.9% |
| Haematotoxicity | 84 | 5.8% |
| Diarrhoealoose or frequent stools | 82 | 5.6% |
| Vomitingbeing sick | 73 | 5% |
| Sepsisa severe body-wide response to infection | 71 | 4.9% |
| Hypotensionlow blood pressure | 69 | 4.7% |
| Thrombocytopenialow platelets | 68 | 4.7% |
| Pneumonialung infection | 61 | 4.2% |
| Disease progressionthe disease advanced | 56 | 3.9% |
| Mucosal inflammation | 51 | 3.5% |
| Platelet count decreasedlow platelet count | 49 | 3.4% |
| Dehydration | 48 | 3.3% |
| Haemoglobin decreasedlow haemoglobin | 46 | 3.2% |
| Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label | 44 | 3% |
| Abdominal painstomach or belly pain | 40 | 2.8% |
| Dyspnoeashortness of breath | 40 | 2.8% |
| Neutrophil count decreased | 40 | 2.8% |
| Anaemialow red blood cells | 39 | 2.7% |
| Pleural effusionfluid around the lung | 39 | 2.7% |
| Pulmonary embolisma blood clot in the lung | 39 | 2.7% |
| Respiratory failurethe lungs could not supply enough oxygen | 39 | 2.7% |
| Renal failurekidney failure | 37 | 2.5% |
| White blood cell count decreasedlow white cell count | 37 | 2.5% |
| Fatiguetiredness | 36 | 2.5% |
| Infectionan infection, type not specified | 35 | 2.4% |
| Drug resistance | 33 | 2.3% |
| Staphylococcal infection | 33 | 2.3% |
| Blood culture positive | 32 | 2.2% |
| Product use in unapproved indicationused for a purpose not on the label | 32 | 2.2% |
| Septic shockshock arising from infection | 32 | 2.2% |
| Acute myeloid leukaemia recurrent | 28 | 1.9% |
| Chillschills or shivering | 28 | 1.9% |
| Pancytopenialow counts of all blood cells | 28 | 1.9% |
| Multi-organ failure | 25 | 1.7% |
| Bone marrow failure | 24 | 1.7% |
| Hypoxialow oxygen | 24 | 1.7% |
| Tachycardiafast heart rate | 24 | 1.7% |
| Acute lymphocytic leukaemia recurrent | 23 | 1.6% |
| Hypertensionhigh blood pressure | 22 | 1.5% |
| Painpain, site not specified | 21 | 1.4% |
| Respiratory distressdifficulty breathing | 21 | 1.4% |
| Hypokalaemialow blood potassium | 20 | 1.4% |
| Astheniaweakness or lack of energy | 19 | 1.3% |
| Constipation | 19 | 1.3% |
| Leukopenialow white blood cells | 19 | 1.3% |
| Pulmonary oedemafluid in the lungs | 19 | 1.3% |
The counts add to more than 1,454 reports, because one report can record more than one term. FDA says:
No individual drug is connected to any individual reaction. When a report lists multiple drugs and multiple reactions, there is no way to conclude from the data therein that a given drug is responsible for a given reaction.
Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .
The CSV file has the same rows and the same limits. Its last row is a note that says so.
MedDRA term
The person who codes a report selects the preferred term that agrees best with the description of the reporter. The words under a term are the plain meaning that this site gives.
Not the label
The FDA-approved label of a product lists its adverse reactions. See the official pages at the end of this page.
Outcomes by year
The table gives the outcomes that the reporters gave, in the terms of FDA.
Outcomes in the reports that name G-Csf, by the year of the openFDA file that holds the report
The table continues to the right.
| Year of the openFDA file | Reports | Serious | Death | Life-threatening | Hospitalization (initial or prolonged) | Disability or Permanent Damage | Congenital Anomaly/Birth Defect | Other Serious (Important Medical Events) | Not serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2005 | 110 | 84 | 14 | 2 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 26 |
| 2006 | 82 | 71 | 12 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 11 |
| 2007 | 97 | 81 | 7 | 1 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 16 |
| 2008 | 60 | 58 | 6 | 0 | 53 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| 2009 | 76 | 74 | 8 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 2010 | 39 | 37 | 4 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 2011 | 42 | 42 | 9 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| 2012 | 90 | 89 | 18 | 4 | 73 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 1 |
| 2013 | 98 | 98 | 31 | 14 | 54 | 2 | 0 | 43 | 0 |
| 2014 | 126 | 126 | 22 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 0 |
| 2015 | 116 | 114 | 83 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 90 | 2 |
| 2016 | 94 | 92 | 28 | 8 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 69 | 2 |
| 2017 | 68 | 65 | 23 | 2 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 39 | 3 |
| 2018 | 124 | 124 | 50 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 0 |
| 2019 | 96 | 93 | 17 | 2 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 3 |
| 2020 | 126 | 120 | 22 | 19 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 6 |
An outcome in a report is not proof that the drug was the cause. The reporter gives the outcome, and FDA does not verify it. FDA says:
The information in these reports has not been scientifically or otherwise verified as to a cause and effect relationship and cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events.
Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .
The six headings with the names of FDA are the outcome terms of FDA. A report can have more than one outcome. The columns Serious and Not serious are the two values of the openFDA field serious. For the value serious, openFDA gives this description:
The adverse event resulted in death, a life threatening condition, hospitalization, disability, congenital anomaly, or other serious condition
Source: openFDA, Drug adverse event fields (YAML reference). The site read the page on .
The year is the year of the openFDA file that holds the latest version of the report. It is not always the year in which FDA first received the report. The chart of the next section uses the year of first receipt. The latest year is not complete.
Reports by year and month
Show the figures of the chart as a table
| Year | Reports |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 9 |
| 2005 | 111 |
| 2006 | 82 |
| 2007 | 97 |
| 2008 | 61 |
| 2009 | 76 |
| 2010 | 39 |
| 2011 | 45 |
| 2012 | 104 |
| 2013 | 91 |
| 2014 | 137 |
| 2015 | 107 |
| 2016 | 90 |
| 2017 | 102 |
| 2018 | 95 |
| 2019 | 86 |
| 2020 | 122 |
FDA received no report that names G-Csf in the five years to June 2026. FDA received the latest report in December 2020.
Why a count moves
A count moves for many reasons. The guide gives FDA's words about them.
Patients and reporters
| Age | Reports | Share | Share as a bar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 | 20 | 1.4% | |
| 2 to 11 | 74 | 5.1% | |
| 12 to 17 | 27 | 1.9% | |
| 18 to 44 | 196 | 13.5% | |
| 45 to 64 | 195 | 13.4% | |
| 65 to 74 | 97 | 6.7% | |
| 75 and over | 46 | 3.2% | |
| Age not given | 799 | 55% |
| Sex | Reports | Share | Share as a bar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 538 | 37% | |
| Male | 628 | 43.2% | |
| Unknown or not given | 288 | 19.8% |
| Reporter | Reports | Share | Share as a bar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physician | 517 | 35.6% | |
| Pharmacist | 7 | 0.5% | |
| Other health professional | 392 | 27% | |
| Lawyer | 0 | 0% | |
| Consumer or non-health professional | 55 | 3.8% | |
| Not given | 483 | 33.2% |
Age and sex are as the report gives them. The reporter is the primary source in the report. 43.5% of the reports give the United States as the country.
Reason for use
| Indication as recorded (MedDRA) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Acute myeloid leukaemia | 115 | 7.9% |
| Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma | 84 | 5.8% |
| Prophylaxis | 70 | 4.8% |
| Peripheral blood stem cell apheresis | 60 | 4.1% |
| Acute lymphocytic leukaemia | 45 | 3.1% |
| Ovarian cancer | 33 | 2.3% |
The reporter fills in the indication, and the field is often empty. Each share is of all 1,454 reports.
Pages near this one
- G Lasta next in the A to Z list
- G-Lasta next in the A to Z list
- Fycompa next in the A to Z list
- Gabapen next in the A to Z list
- Fuzeon next in the A to Z list
- Gabapentin next in the A to Z list
- Fusidic acid next in the A to Z list
- Gabapentin enacarbil next in the A to Z list
- Furosemide next in the A to Z list
- Gabapentine next in the A to Z list
- Furosemid next in the A to Z list
- Gabitril next in the A to Z list
These links are for navigation. No count selected them.
Official pages
- DailyMed labels for G-CsfThe labels (prescribing information) that have this name, at the National Library of Medicine.
- MedWatch Online Voluntary Reporting FormThe online form of FDA for a voluntary report.
- MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting ProgramThe page of the FDA program that receives reports about drugs and devices.
- FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) Public DashboardThe public dashboard of FDA for adverse event reports on drugs and biologics.
The site checked these addresses on . The links open in a new tab.
Cite this page
Reported Reactions. G-Csf: adverse event reports that FDA received. https://reportedreactions.com/drug/g-csf/ Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) files, release of . Reports received through .
Where the data come from
The counts come from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk files, release of 1 Oct 2026. The files have the reports that FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. A drug name is the name on the report. The site matches it to a brand name or a generic name of the National Drug Code Directory of 2 Oct 2026. A class is the pharmacologic class (EPC) of the FDA label.
A report is in the count when it names G-Csf as a suspect or interacting product. The 1,814 reports that name it only as a concomitant medicine are not in the count. The site does not publish a report narrative, a lot number, a detail of a patient or the identity of a reporter. The record of FDA is the authority. See how the site counts reports, the data sources and the corrections page.
Questions
Do these reports show that G-Csf was responsible for the reactions?
No. FDA says:
For any given report, there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event.
Source: FDA, FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) Public Dashboard. Content current as of . The site read the page on .
A reaction can relate to the condition that the drug treats, to other medicines, or to something else.
Is this the list of reactions on the label of G-Csf?
No. It is a count of what people reported to FDA: 1,454 reports from January 2004 to December 2020. The FDA-approved label of a product lists its adverse reactions. The official pages at the end of this page link to the labels.
Who sent these reports?
Physician (35.6%), other health professional (27%) and consumer or non-health professional (3.8%). These are the types of reporter for the reports that name this drug.
If a manufacturer receives an adverse event report, it is normally required to send the report to FDA.
Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .
How does a person report an adverse event?
FDA runs MedWatch, a program that takes voluntary reports from health professionals, patients and consumers. The guide on how to report has the links.