Reported Reactions

Drugs › Penem antibacterial

Generic name

Ertapenem: adverse event reports filed with FDA

1,686 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2004–2026. Class: Penem antibacterial. Also reported as Ertapenem For Injection.

1,686
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 77 a year
276
reports, 12 months to June 2026
270 in the 12 months before
90.1%
marked serious by the reporter
94.1% across the class
6.8%
record death among outcomes, as reported
115 reports · not verified by FDA

1,686 adverse event reports received by FDA list ertapenem, a generic name as a suspect or interacting product, from July 2004 to June 2026. A further 1,287 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 276 reports listed it, close to the 270 of the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 77 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 7.2% of the reports for the penem antibacterial class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

The reactions recorded most often are drug ineffective (16.5%), off label use (7.9%) and macular degeneration (7.3%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 451 different terms appear across these reports. Drug ineffective is recorded in 16.5% of these reports, about the same share as in the median penem antibacterial drug (15.7%).

90.1% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (94.1% across the class); 6.8% record death among the outcomes and 51.4% record hospitalisation, as reported. 39.6% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is 75 and over (24.7%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

02346Jul 2021: 24Aug 2021: 22Sep 2021: 7Oct 2021: 6Nov 2021: 8Dec 2021: 112022Jan 2022: 11Feb 2022: 14Mar 2022: 6Apr 2022: 7May 2022: 15Jun 2022: 9Jul 2022: 8Aug 2022: 8Sep 2022: 12Oct 2022: 11Nov 2022: 26Dec 2022: 222023Jan 2023: 4Feb 2023: 14Mar 2023: 9Apr 2023: 10May 2023: 17Jun 2023: 30Jul 2023: 14Aug 2023: 14Sep 2023: 27Oct 2023: 15Nov 2023: 14Dec 2023: 72024Jan 2024: 16Feb 2024: 17Mar 2024: 17Apr 2024: 27May 2024: 10Jun 2024: 11Jul 2024: 16Aug 2024: 13Sep 2024: 18Oct 2024: 46Nov 2024: 18Dec 2024: 182025Jan 2025: 12Feb 2025: 28Mar 2025: 26Apr 2025: 34May 2025: 17Jun 2025: 24Jul 2025: 29Aug 2025: 16Sep 2025: 21Oct 2025: 15Nov 2025: 26Dec 2025: 352026Jan 2026: 21Feb 2026: 18Mar 2026: 31Apr 2026: 27May 2026: 23Jun 2026: 14

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

01422832004: 420042005: 32007: 72008: 820082009: 92010: 92011: 1320112012: 402013: 462014: 3320142015: 442016: 302017: 4620172018: 752019: 822020: 11220202021: 1572022: 1492023: 17520232024: 2272025: 2832026: 1342026

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Ertapenem reports recording the termmedian drug in penem antibacterial

  1. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected16.5%278
  2. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label7.9%133
  3. Macular degenerationa disease of the central retina7.3%123
  4. Confusional stateconfusion6.9%117
  5. Seizurea fit or convulsion5.5%93
  6. Nauseafeeling sick5.5%92
  7. Pyrexiafever5%84
  8. Painpain, site not specified4.6%78
  9. Product use in unapproved indicationused for a purpose not on the label4.4%75
  10. Diarrhoealoose or frequent stools4.3%72
  11. Drug interactionan interaction between medicines4%68
  12. Hallucinationseeing or hearing things that are not there3.9%65
  13. Anaemialow red blood cells3.6%60
  14. Clostridium difficile colitisa bowel infection with C. difficile3.5%59
  15. Weight decreasedweight loss3.5%59
  16. Condition aggravatedthe condition being treated got worse3.2%54
  17. Abdominal painstomach or belly pain3.1%53
  18. Constipationconstipation3.1%52
  19. Headachehead pain3.1%52
  20. Malaisegeneral feeling of being unwell3.1%52
  21. Chronic sinusitis3%50
  22. Oral candidiasisoral thrush3%50
  23. Erythemaskin redness2.9%49
  24. Female genital tract fistula2.9%49
  25. Haematocheziablood in the stool2.9%49

Top 30 of 451 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 6 drugs in the penem antibacterial class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death6.8%115
Life-threatening9.8%165
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)51.4%867
Disability1.4%23
Congenital anomaly0.1%1
Other serious59.9%1,010
Not serious9.9%167

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 23,429 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20.4%6
2 to 110.7%11
12 to 170.5%9
18 to 4412.6%213
45 to 6423.1%389
65 to 7420.8%350
75 and over24.7%417
Age not given17.3%291

Patient sex

Female39.7%669
Male50%843
Not given10.3%174

Who reported

Physician29.7%500
Pharmacist21.1%356
Other health professional39.6%667
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional7.9%134
Not given1.7%29

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 38.3% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Urinary tract infection1438.5%
Osteomyelitis724.3%
Infection593.5%
Antibiotic therapy432.6%
Bacteraemia402.4%
Klebsiella infection382.3%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 1,686 reports.

Drugs most often listed in the same reports

Drug (any role in the report)ReportsShare of Ertapenem reports
Metronidazole21512.8%
Meropenem21012.5%
Prednisone18511%
Acetaminophen18010.7%
Amoxicillin1679.9%
Pantoprazole1629.6%
Alprazolam1438.5%
Aspirin1408.3%
Vancomycin1378.1%
Clarithromycin1267.5%

Other products listed in reports where Ertapenem is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.

In context

MeasureErtapenemPenem antibacterialAll reports
Reports as suspect product1,68623,42920,646,523
Share of that pool—7.2%0%
Reports, latest 12 months276—1,332,454
Marked serious90.1%94.1%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports6822491
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports514487213
Consumer-filed share7.9%7.8%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsDrug ineffective 16.5%median 15.7%6.3%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the penem antibacterial class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Meropenemgeneric15,3651,50597.6%
Invanzbrand2,8009474.6%
Imipenem and cilastatin sodiumgeneric1,2761096.2%
Imipenem and cilastatingeneric1,2295997%
Ertapenem sodiumgeneric1,0733696.2%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Ertapenem reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Ertapenem?

1,686 reports list Ertapenem as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 276 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 1,287 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Ertapenem reports?

drug ineffective (16.5%), off label use (7.9%), macular degeneration (7.3%), confusional state (6.9%) and seizure (5.5%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Ertapenem was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

90.1% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 6.8% of reports include death and 51.4% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

other health professional (39.6%), physician (29.7%) and pharmacist (21.1%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Ertapenem rising?

276 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, close to the 270 of the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Ertapenem was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Ertapenem?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Ertapenem as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (1,287) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.