Reported Reactions

Drugs › Penem antibacterial

Generic name

Ertapenem sodium: adverse event reports filed with FDA

1,073 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2007–2026. Class: Penem antibacterial.

1,073
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 56 a year
36
reports, 12 months to June 2026
48 in the 12 months before
96.2%
marked serious by the reporter
94.1% across the class
3.6%
record death among outcomes, as reported
39 reports · not verified by FDA

1,073 adverse event reports received by FDA list ertapenem sodium, a generic name as a suspect or interacting product, from May 2007 to June 2026. A further 103 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 36 reports listed it, down 25% from 48 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 56 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 4.6% of the reports for the penem antibacterial class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

Reporters most often recorded drug ineffective (64%), macular degeneration (61.6%) and pyrexia (17.6%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 179 different terms appear across these reports. Drug ineffective is recorded in 64% of these reports, a larger share than in the median penem antibacterial drug (15.7%).

96.2% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (94.1% across the class); 3.6% record death among the outcomes and 35.9% record hospitalisation, as reported. 49.3% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is 65 to 74 (21.5%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

03774Jul 2021: 18Aug 2021: 47Sep 2021: 32Oct 2021: 34Nov 2021: 20Dec 2021: 742022Jan 2022: 28Feb 2022: 29Mar 2022: 31Apr 2022: 37May 2022: 16Jun 2022: 15Jul 2022: 13Aug 2022: 25Sep 2022: 12Oct 2022: 10Nov 2022: 8Dec 2022: 72023Jan 2023: 13Feb 2023: 13Mar 2023: 12Apr 2023: 13May 2023: 10Jun 2023: 6Jul 2023: 12Aug 2023: 13Sep 2023: 8Oct 2023: 6Nov 2023: 8Dec 2023: 52024Jan 2024: 6Feb 2024: 5Mar 2024: 8Apr 2024: 13May 2024: 6Jun 2024: 4Jul 2024: 7Aug 2024: 11Sep 2024: 5Oct 2024: 6Nov 2024: 4Dec 2024: 12025Jan 2025: 4Feb 2025: 3Mar 2025: 3Apr 2025: 1May 2025: 2Jun 2025: 1Jul 2025: 5Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 3Oct 2025: 3Nov 2025: 3Dec 2025: 22026Jan 2026: 2Feb 2026: 1Mar 2026: 4Apr 2026: 7May 2026: 5Jun 2026: 1

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

01593172007: 220072011: 22012: 220122013: 82014: 1720142015: 302016: 2420162017: 162018: 2720182019: 722020: 8020202021: 3172022: 23120222023: 1192024: 7620242025: 302026: 202026

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Ertapenem sodium reports recording the termmedian drug in penem antibacterial

  1. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected64%687
  2. Macular degenerationa disease of the central retina61.6%661
  3. Pyrexiafever17.6%189
  4. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label16%172
  5. Painpain, site not specified15.8%169
  6. Chronic sinusitis15.6%167
  7. Malaisegeneral feeling of being unwell15.6%167
  8. Nauseafeeling sick15.6%167
  9. Weight decreasedweight loss15.6%167
  10. Infusion related reactiona reaction during or soon after an infusion15.2%163
  11. Dyspepsiaindigestion14.5%156
  12. Procedural painpain from a procedure14.4%155
  13. Anaemialow red blood cells12.4%133
  14. Erythemaskin redness11.4%122
  15. Constipationconstipation11.3%121
  16. Female genital tract fistula11.3%121
  17. Abdominal painstomach or belly pain11.2%120
  18. Colitisinflamed bowel11.2%120
  19. Haematocheziablood in the stool11.2%120
  20. Headachehead pain11.2%120
  21. Oral candidiasisoral thrush11.1%119
  22. Radiculopathy11.1%119
  23. Vaginal flatulence11.1%119
  24. Proctitis11%118

Top 30 of 179 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 6 drugs in the penem antibacterial class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death3.6%39
Life-threatening3%32
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)35.9%385
Disability0.9%10
Congenital anomaly0.1%1
Other serious84.6%908
Not serious3.8%41

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 23,429 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20.3%3
2 to 110.3%3
12 to 170.2%2
18 to 444%43
45 to 648.6%92
65 to 7421.5%231
75 and over11.8%127
Age not given53.3%572

Patient sex

Female65.3%701
Male19.8%212
Not given14.9%160

Who reported

Physician16.7%179
Pharmacist6.7%72
Other health professional49.3%529
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional26.4%283
Not given0.9%10

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 6.4% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Urinary tract infection413.8%
Antibiotic therapy191.8%
Infection131.2%
Klebsiella infection131.2%
Osteomyelitis111%
Bacteraemia60.6%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 1,073 reports.

Drugs most often listed in the same reports

Drug (any role in the report)ReportsShare of Ertapenem sodium reports
Alprazolam65761.2%
Nadolol65661.1%
Metronidazole65260.8%
Clarithromycin65160.7%
Prednisone64760.3%
Clotrimazole64660.2%
Acetaminophen64560.1%
Pregabalin63559.2%
Desonide63258.9%
Nicoderm Cq62258%

Other products listed in reports where Ertapenem sodium is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.

In context

MeasureErtapenem sodiumPenem antibacterialAll reports
Reports as suspect product1,07323,42920,646,523
Share of that pool—4.6%0%
Reports, latest 12 months36—1,332,454
Marked serious96.2%94.1%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports3622491
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports359487213
Consumer-filed share26.4%7.8%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsDrug ineffective 64%median 15.7%6.3%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the penem antibacterial class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Meropenemgeneric15,3651,50597.6%
Invanzbrand2,8009474.6%
Ertapenemgeneric1,68627690.1%
Imipenem and cilastatin sodiumgeneric1,2761096.2%
Imipenem and cilastatingeneric1,2295997%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Ertapenem sodium reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Ertapenem sodium?

1,073 reports list Ertapenem sodium as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 36 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 103 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Ertapenem sodium reports?

drug ineffective (64%), macular degeneration (61.6%), pyrexia (17.6%), off label use (16%) and pain (15.8%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Ertapenem sodium was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

96.2% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 3.6% of reports include death and 35.9% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

other health professional (49.3%), consumer or non-health professional (26.4%) and physician (16.7%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Ertapenem sodium rising?

36 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 25% from 48 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Ertapenem sodium was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Ertapenem sodium?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Ertapenem sodium as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (103) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.