Device brand name · Clip implantable
Ligaclip Endoscopic Clip Applier: medical device reports filed with FDA
1,278 reports name it, 1996–2015. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Product code FZP.
- 1,278
- device reports naming the brand
- 0% of all MAUDE reports · about 43 a year
- 0
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 0 in the 12 months before
- 99.1%
- classified as malfunction
- 90.6% across the product code
- 0%
- classified as death, as reported
- 0 reports · not verified by FDA
FDA's MAUDE database holds 1,278 reports that name the brand "Ligaclip Endoscopic Clip Applier" (clip implantable), received between October 1996 and December 2015; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.
0 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (99.1%) and injury (0.9%); across all clip, implantable reports (product code FZP) death is recorded in 0.3% and malfunction in 90.6%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.
The device problems coded most often are failure to form staple (54.4%), component falling (11.9%) and device operates differently than expected (10.5%). The patient problems coded most often are bleeding, hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding and other (for use when an appropriate patient code cannot be identified). FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Reports by month, five years
No report naming Ligaclip Endoscopic Clip Applier was received in the five years to August 2026; the latest was received in December 2015.
By year received
Event type and report source
Event type, as classified on the report
Who filed the report
Grey bar: all 42,395 reports carrying product code FZP. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share | Share across product code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Failure to form staple | 695 | 54.4% | 27.7% |
| Component falling | 152 | 11.9% | 3.8% |
| Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly | 134 | 10.5% | 4.6% |
| Unintended ejection | 82 | 6.4% | 1.9% |
| Difficult to open or close | 65 | 5.1% | 8.1% |
| Detachment of device component | 55 | 4.3% | 1.6% |
| Misfire | 39 | 3.1% | 5.7% |
| Material deformation | 37 | 2.9% | 2.1% |
| Failure to fire | 29 | 2.3% | 8% |
| Device slipped | 25 | 2% | 1.8% |
| Failure to align | 25 | 2% | 1.1% |
| Mechanical jam | 25 | 2% | 6.4% |
| Mechanics altered | 25 | 2% | 9.4% |
| Activation, positioning or separation problem | 18 | 1.4% | 2.3% |
| Positioning failure | 17 | 1.3% | 3.5% |
| Failure to advance | 14 | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Insufficient device problem information | 13 | 1% | 1.4% |
| Device inoperablethe device could not be used | 11 | 0.9% | 0.6% |
| Sticking | 10 | 0.8% | 2.7% |
| Bent | 8 | 0.6% | 0.3% |
FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.
Patient problems coded
| Patient problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Bleeding | 21 | 1.6% |
| Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding | 11 | 0.9% |
| Other (for use when an appropriate patient code cannot be identified) | 10 | 0.8% |
| Failure to anastomose | 7 | 0.5% |
| No patient involvement | 7 | 0.5% |
| Foreign body, removal of | 6 | 0.5% |
| Tissue damage | 6 | 0.5% |
| Surgical procedure, additional | 4 | 0.3% |
| Device embedded in tissue or plaque | 2 | 0.2% |
| Dural tear | 2 | 0.2% |
| Abdominal distention | 1 | 0.1% |
| Blood loss | 1 | 0.1% |
| Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient | 1 | 0.1% |
| Injurya physical injury | 1 | 0.1% |
| Laceration(s) | 1 | 0.1% |
Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.
In context
| Measure | Ligaclip Endoscopic Clip Applier | Product code FZP | All MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | 1,278 | 42,395 | 26,136,888 |
| Share of that pool | — | 3% | 0% |
| Classified as death, per 1,000 reports | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Classified as injury | 0.9% | 8% | 36.2% |
| Classified as malfunction | 99.1% | 90.6% | 62.3% |
| Filed by the manufacturer | 100% | 96.6% | 94.9% |
Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Other brands with product code FZP
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligamax-5mm Endo Clip Applier | 6,836 | 234 | 0% |
| Auto Endo5 Ml | 2,069 | 22 | 0% |
| Rotating Multiple Clip Applier | 1,798 | 0 | 0.2% |
| Ligaclip Endo Rotating Mca | 2,209 | 109 | 0% |
| Ligaclip Clip Applier | 1,787 | 0 | 0% |
| Endo Clip | 1,308 | 85 | 0.1% |
| Ligamax-5mm | 1,222 | 0 | 0.1% |
| Ca500 Epix Universal Clip Applier 3/Bx | 1,154 | 0 | 0.1% |
| Ca090 Direct Drive Lca 3/Bx | 1,143 | 0 | 0.2% |
| Ligaclip | 1,425 | 308 | 0% |
| Ligamax | 1,029 | 308 | 0% |
| Epix Universal Clip Applier | 866 | 232 | 0% |
| Ligaclip Endoscopic Rotating Multiple Clip Applier 20 Large Titanium Ligating Cl | 859 | 0 | 0% |
| Lapra-Ty Absorbable X6 Suture Clip | 828 | 118 | 0% |
| Ligamax Clip Applier | 736 | 0 | 0.1% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."
Questions about Ligaclip Endoscopic Clip Applier reports
How many FDA reports name Ligaclip Endoscopic Clip Applier?
1,278 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 0 in the latest 12 months.
What kinds of events are reported?
malfunction (99.1%) and injury (0.9%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.
What device problems are coded?
failure to form staple (54.4%), component falling (11.9%), device operates differently than expected (10.5%), unintended ejection (6.4%) and difficult to open or close (5.1%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.
Who files these reports?
manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.
Do these reports show that Ligaclip Endoscopic Clip Applier was at fault?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."
How do I report a problem with a medical device?
Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.