Device brand name · Clip implantable
Ligaclip Endo Rotating Mca: medical device reports filed with FDA
2,209 reports name it, 2005–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Product code FZP.
- 2,209
- device reports naming the brand
- 0% of all MAUDE reports · about 103 a year
- 109
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 253 in the 12 months before
- 96.1%
- classified as malfunction
- 90.6% across the product code
- 0%
- classified as death, as reported
- 0 reports · not verified by FDA
2,209 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Ligaclip Endo Rotating Mca" (clip implantable); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Ethicon Endo-Surgery; received from January 2005 to March 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.
109 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 57% from 253 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (96.1%) and injury (3.6%); across all clip, implantable reports (product code FZP) death is recorded in 0.3% and malfunction in 90.6%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.
The device problems coded most often are failure to form staple (56%), replace (12.9%) and failure to fire (12.6%). The patient problems coded most often are failure to anastomose, hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding and blood loss. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
By year received
Event type and report source
Event type, as classified on the report
Who filed the report
Grey bar: all 42,395 reports carrying product code FZP. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share | Share across product code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Failure to form staple | 1,238 | 56% | 27.7% |
| Replace | 285 | 12.9% | 6.3% |
| Failure to fire | 279 | 12.6% | 8% |
| Difficult to open or close | 125 | 5.7% | 8.1% |
| Clips, scissored | 97 | 4.4% | 1% |
| Firing problem | 75 | 3.4% | 0.8% |
| Mechanical problema mechanical problem | 59 | 2.7% | 5.9% |
| Mechanical jam | 49 | 2.2% | 6.4% |
| Component falling | 40 | 1.8% | 3.8% |
| Insufficient device problem information | 35 | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Misfire | 35 | 1.6% | 5.7% |
| Sticking | 32 | 1.4% | 2.7% |
| Mechanics altered | 29 | 1.3% | 9.4% |
| Device issuea problem with the device | 24 | 1.1% | 0.7% |
| Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly | 22 | 1% | 4.6% |
| Close, difficult to | 21 | 1% | 0.3% |
| Delivered as unsterile product | 19 | 0.9% | 0.2% |
| Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off | 19 | 0.9% | 1.7% |
| Failure to advance | 19 | 0.9% | 1.3% |
| Failure to align | 14 | 0.6% | 1.1% |
FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.
Patient problems coded
| Patient problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to anastomose | 217 | 9.8% |
| Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding | 39 | 1.8% |
| Blood loss | 14 | 0.6% |
| Not applicable | 7 | 0.3% |
| Surgical procedure, additional | 6 | 0.3% |
| Bleeding | 4 | 0.2% |
| Foreign body, removal of | 4 | 0.2% |
| Hospitalization required | 4 | 0.2% |
| Peritonitis | 4 | 0.2% |
| Surgical procedure | 4 | 0.2% |
| Inflammationinflammation | 3 | 0.1% |
| Painpain, site not specified | 3 | 0.1% |
| Abdominal painstomach or belly pain | 2 | 0.1% |
| Abscessa collection of pus | 2 | 0.1% |
| Cut(s) | 2 | 0.1% |
Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.
In context
| Measure | Ligaclip Endo Rotating Mca | Product code FZP | All MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | 2,209 | 42,395 | 26,136,888 |
| Share of that pool | — | 5.2% | 0% |
| Classified as death, per 1,000 reports | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Classified as injury | 3.6% | 8% | 36.2% |
| Classified as malfunction | 96.1% | 90.6% | 62.3% |
| Filed by the manufacturer | 99.7% | 96.6% | 94.9% |
Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Other brands with product code FZP
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligamax-5mm Endo Clip Applier | 6,836 | 234 | 0% |
| Auto Endo5 Ml | 2,069 | 22 | 0% |
| Rotating Multiple Clip Applier | 1,798 | 0 | 0.2% |
| Ligaclip Clip Applier | 1,787 | 0 | 0% |
| Endo Clip | 1,308 | 85 | 0.1% |
| Ligaclip Endoscopic Clip Applier | 1,278 | 0 | 0% |
| Ligamax-5mm | 1,222 | 0 | 0.1% |
| Ca500 Epix Universal Clip Applier 3/Bx | 1,154 | 0 | 0.1% |
| Ca090 Direct Drive Lca 3/Bx | 1,143 | 0 | 0.2% |
| Ligaclip | 1,425 | 308 | 0% |
| Ligamax | 1,029 | 308 | 0% |
| Epix Universal Clip Applier | 866 | 232 | 0% |
| Ligaclip Endoscopic Rotating Multiple Clip Applier 20 Large Titanium Ligating Cl | 859 | 0 | 0% |
| Lapra-Ty Absorbable X6 Suture Clip | 828 | 118 | 0% |
| Ligamax Clip Applier | 736 | 0 | 0.1% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."
Questions about Ligaclip Endo Rotating Mca reports
How many FDA reports name Ligaclip Endo Rotating Mca?
2,209 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 109 in the latest 12 months.
What kinds of events are reported?
malfunction (96.1%) and injury (3.6%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.
What device problems are coded?
failure to form staple (56%), replace (12.9%), failure to fire (12.6%), difficult to open or close (5.7%) and clips, scissored (4.4%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.
Who files these reports?
manufacturer reports (99.7%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.
Do these reports show that Ligaclip Endo Rotating Mca was at fault?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."
How do I report a problem with a medical device?
Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.