Reported Reactions

Devices › Suture, absorbable, synthetic, polyglycolic acid

Device brand name · Suture absorbable synthetic

Coated VICRYL: medical device reports filed with FDA

978 reports name it, 2009–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Ethicon. Product code GAM.

978
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 56 a year
851
reports, 12 months to August 2026
8 in the 12 months before
92.4%
classified as malfunction
76.5% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 978 reports that name the brand "Coated VICRYL" (suture absorbable synthetic), received between January 2009 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Ethicon. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

851 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 10538% from 8 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (92.4%) and injury (7.1%); across all suture, absorbable, synthetic, polyglycolic acid reports (product code GAM) death is recorded in 0.2% and malfunction in 76.5%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are material separation (42.2%), break (36.3%) and material frayed (2.7%). The patient problems coded most often are pocket erosion, impaired healing and wound dehiscence. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

093186Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 1Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 1Feb 2022: 1Mar 2022: 1Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 1Jul 2022: 0Aug 2022: 3Sep 2022: 1Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 2Dec 2022: 12023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 1Mar 2023: 3Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 1Jul 2023: 1Aug 2023: 2Sep 2023: 3Oct 2023: 1Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 12024Jan 2024: 2Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 2Jul 2024: 2Aug 2024: 1Sep 2024: 1Oct 2024: 1Nov 2024: 1Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 2Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 1May 2025: 1Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 1Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 1Oct 2025: 1Nov 2025: 1Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 4Feb 2026: 14Mar 2026: 65Apr 2026: 186May 2026: 126Jun 2026: 124Jul 2026: 154Aug 2026: 175

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

04248482009: 320092010: 32011: 1220112012: 32017: 2520172018: 132019: 920192020: 82021: 920212022: 112023: 1520232024: 112025: 820252026: 848

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury7.1%69
Malfunction92.4%904
Other0%0
Not given0.5%5

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report87.6%857
Voluntary report0.3%3
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given12.1%118

Grey bar: all 56,946 reports carrying product code GAM. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Material separation41342.2%18.8%
Breakthe device broke35536.3%36.3%
Material frayed262.7%1.2%
Device contaminated during manufacture or shipping171.7%0.4%
Failure to degrade171.7%0.2%
Component misassembled80.8%0.3%
Component missing70.7%0.6%
Delivered as unsterile product70.7%0.2%
Material integrity problema problem with the device material70.7%1.6%
Device markings/labelling problema problem with the device markings or label60.6%0.6%
Dull, blunt60.6%0.3%
Detachment of device component50.5%1%
Product quality problem40.4%0.5%
Bent20.2%0.2%
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off20.2%16%
Device packaging compromised20.2%0%
Manufacturing, packaging or shipping problem20.2%0.6%
Material fragmentation20.2%0.1%
Component falling10.1%0.1%
Defective component10.1%0.4%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Pocket erosion282.9%
Impaired healingslow healing252.6%
Wound dehiscencea wound reopened202%
Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient191.9%
Painpain, site not specified191.9%
Abscessa collection of pus171.7%
Inflammationinflammation101%
Not applicable90.9%
Fluid discharge60.6%
Erythemaskin redness50.5%
Fistula40.4%
Granuloma40.4%
Purulent discharge40.4%
Device embedded in tissue or plaque30.3%
Swelling/ edema30.3%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureCoated VICRYLProduct code GAMAll MAUDE reports
Reports97856,94626,136,888
Share of that pool—1.7%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports029
Classified as injury7.1%23%36.2%
Classified as malfunction92.4%76.5%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer87.6%98%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code GAM

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Polysorb5,4101,8360%
V-Loc 1803,4476780%
Vicryl Polyglactin 910 Suture Unknown Product2,3732101.2%
Coated VICRYL (polyglactin 910) Suture1,930200.5%
Maxon1,8093090%
Biosyn1,6812610%
V-Loc 901,3782260%
VICRYL Polyglactin 910 Suture1,262740.1%
Vcl+ Ud 27in 5-0 S/A Tf1,1251580.1%
Vicryl Plus Antibacterial Polyglactin 910 Suture85200.1%
Coated Vicryl Plus Antibacterial Polyglactin 91072400%
Vcl+ Ud 18in 5-0 S/A P-3 Prm Mp5181260%
Unknown VLoc Product413393.6%
Caprosyn399940%
Vcl+ Vio 36in 2-0 S/A Ct-1399420.3%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Coated VICRYL reports

How many FDA reports name Coated VICRYL?

978 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 851 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (92.4%) and injury (7.1%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

material separation (42.2%), break (36.3%), material frayed (2.7%), device contaminated during manufacture or shipping (1.7%) and failure to degrade (1.7%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (87.6%) and voluntary reports (0.3%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Coated VICRYL was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.