Devices › Interventional fluoroscopic x-ray system
Device brand name · Interventional fluoroscopic x-ray system
Allura Xper FD20: medical device reports filed with FDA
2,179 reports name it, 2007–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Philips Medical Systems Nederland. Product code OWB.
- 2,179
- device reports naming the brand
- 0% of all MAUDE reports · about 115 a year
- 676
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 369 in the 12 months before
- 95.7%
- classified as malfunction
- 98.5% across the product code
- 0.6%
- classified as death, as reported
- 14 reports · not verified by FDA
FDA's MAUDE database holds 2,179 reports that name the brand "Allura Xper FD20" (interventional fluoroscopic x-ray system), received between August 2007 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Philips Medical Systems Nederland. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.
676 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 83% from 369 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (95.7%), injury (3.2%) and death (0.6%); across all interventional fluoroscopic x-ray system reports (product code OWB) death is recorded in 0.2% and malfunction in 98.5%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.
The device problems coded most often are activation failure (33.5%), radiation output failure (23.3%) and positioning failure (16.9%). The patient problems coded most often are death, radiation burn and hair loss. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
By year received
Event type and report source
Event type, as classified on the report
Who filed the report
Grey bar: all 50,356 reports carrying product code OWB. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share | Share across product code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activation failure | 731 | 33.5% | 25.5% |
| Radiation output failure | 507 | 23.3% | 21% |
| Positioning failure | 369 | 16.9% | 7.7% |
| No display/image | 152 | 7% | 4.3% |
| Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly | 56 | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| No device output | 34 | 1.6% | 0.2% |
| Loss of powerthe device lost power | 25 | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Failure to power up | 23 | 1.1% | 1.9% |
| Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off | 22 | 1% | 0.7% |
| Bent | 19 | 0.9% | 0% |
| Device displays incorrect message | 17 | 0.8% | 3.4% |
| Device inoperablethe device could not be used | 16 | 0.7% | 7.4% |
| Unintended system motionthe device moved when it should not have | 15 | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| Application interface becomes non-functional or program exits abnormally | 13 | 0.6% | 0.8% |
| Display or visual feedback problem | 11 | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Insufficient device problem information | 11 | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Smoking | 11 | 0.5% | 0.2% |
| Mechanical problema mechanical problem | 10 | 0.5% | 1% |
| Radiation overexposure | 10 | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| Breakthe device broke | 8 | 0.4% | 0.1% |
FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.
Patient problems coded
| Patient problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term | 11 | 0.5% |
| Radiation burn | 11 | 0.5% |
| Hair loss | 10 | 0.5% |
| No patient involvement | 9 | 0.4% |
| Injurya physical injury | 8 | 0.4% |
| Falla fall | 6 | 0.3% |
| Radiation overdose | 6 | 0.3% |
| Burn(s)a burn | 5 | 0.2% |
| Cardiac arrestthe heart stopped | 4 | 0.2% |
| Bone fracture(s) | 3 | 0.1% |
| Bruise/contusion | 3 | 0.1% |
| Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding | 3 | 0.1% |
| Appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available | 2 | 0.1% |
| Laceration(s) | 2 | 0.1% |
| Perforation | 2 | 0.1% |
Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.
In context
| Measure | Allura Xper FD20 | Product code OWB | All MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | 2,179 | 50,356 | 26,136,888 |
| Share of that pool | — | 4.3% | 0% |
| Classified as death, per 1,000 reports | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| Classified as injury | 3.2% | 1.2% | 36.2% |
| Classified as malfunction | 95.7% | 98.5% | 62.3% |
| Filed by the manufacturer | 99.4% | 99.6% | 94.9% |
Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Other brands with product code OWB
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allura Xper FD | 20,061 | 5,580 | 0.1% |
| Azurion | 10,988 | 3,673 | 0.1% |
| O-Arm O2 Imaging System | 10,979 | 681 | 0.1% |
| Allura Xper FD20/10 & Allura Xper FD20/20 | 400 | 130 | 0.3% |
| O2 | 352 | 0 | 0.3% |
| Base Sys Bi70002000 O-Arm Sys O2 | 336 | 0 | 0% |
| Artis zee floor | 232 | 6 | 3.4% |
| Artis Zee Ceiling | 209 | 4 | 0.5% |
| O2 O-Arm Imaging System | 154 | 0 | 0% |
| O-Arm | 386 | 0 | 0% |
| Artis zee biplane | 182 | 7 | 1.1% |
| Allura Xper FD10/10 | 327 | 111 | 0.3% |
| O-Arm Imaging System | 396 | 44 | 1.5% |
| Allura Xper FD10 | 1,328 | 404 | 1.3% |
| Innova | 868 | 32 | 0.7% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."
Questions about Allura Xper FD20 reports
How many FDA reports name Allura Xper FD20?
2,179 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 676 in the latest 12 months.
What kinds of events are reported?
malfunction (95.7%), injury (3.2%) and death (0.6%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.
What device problems are coded?
activation failure (33.5%), radiation output failure (23.3%), positioning failure (16.9%), no display/image (7%) and device operates differently than expected (2.6%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.
Who files these reports?
manufacturer reports (99.4%) and distributor reports (0.3%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.
Do these reports show that Allura Xper FD20 was at fault?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."
How do I report a problem with a medical device?
Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.