Devices › Device types
FDA product code HSH · class 2 · Orthopedic
Prosthesis, knee, hemi-, tibial, resurfacing (uncemented): medical device reports filed with FDA
8,111 reports carry this product code, 1992–2022; 30 brands with a page.
- 8,111
- reports with this product code
- 0% of all MAUDE reports
- 0
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 0 in the 12 months before
- 13.3%
- classified as malfunction
- 62.3% across all reports
- 0.1%
- classified as death, as reported
- 0.9% across all reports
Product code HSH is FDA's classification for "Prosthesis, knee, hemi-, tibial, resurfacing (uncemented)" (orthopedic panel), a class 2 device. 8,111 medical device reports carry this product code, 0% of the MAUDE database, from March 1992 to August 2022.
0 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (80.6%), malfunction (13.3%) and other (5.4%). 30 brand names with a page on this site carry this code; the brands table is ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Brands with this product code
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death | Classified as malfunction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Depuy Insert | 293 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Unknown Depuy Tibial Tray | 266 | 0 | 0% | 0.2% |
| Unknown Depuy Tibial Insert | 205 | 0 | 0% | 0.1% |
| Foundation Knee System | 143 | 0 | 0% | 3.8% |
| Zimmer | 142 | 0 | 2.8% | 17.2% |
| Unk Depuy Insert | 103 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Genesis | 45 | 0 | 0.1% | 1.9% |
| Series 7000 Standard Tibia | 45 | 0 | 0% | 7.8% |
| Journey | 43 | 0 | 0% | 13.3% |
| Optetrak | 38 | 15 | 0% | 3.5% |
| Biomet | 34 | 0 | 0.3% | 20.5% |
| Triathlon Cr X3 Tibial Insert | 29 | 13 | 0% | 8.4% |
| Mbt Cem Keel Tib Tray Sz3 | 26 | 9 | 0% | 0.6% |
| Pca Knee | 18 | 0 | 0% | 3% |
| Triathlon Ps X3 Tibial Insert | 18 | 21 | 0% | 12.9% |
| Profix | 15 | 0 | 0% | 0.1% |
| Unknown Tibial Tray | 15 | 25 | 0.2% | 3% |
| Mbt Cem Keel Tib Tray Sz4 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 0.2% |
| 3dknee | 12 | 0 | 0% | 0.7% |
| Triathlon Prim Tib Baseplate - Cemented | 12 | 3 | 0.5% | 13.3% |
| Nexgen Stemmed Tibial Component | 11 | 0 | 0% | 12.7% |
| Unknown Depuy Patella | 9 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Mbt Cem Keel Tib Tray Sz5 | 8 | 3 | 0% | 1.3% |
| Pfc Keel Tib Tray Cem Sz3 | 8 | 0 | 0% | 0.6% |
| Pfc Sigmarp Stb Tb In 3 10 0 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 0% |
| Mbt Cem Keel Tib Tray Sz2 5 | 7 | 6 | 0% | 0.3% |
| Nexgen Mis Stemmed Tibial Component | 7 | 0 | 0% | 10.5% |
| Pfc Sigma Mod Tib Tray Cem Sz4 | 7 | 0 | 0% | 1.1% |
| Unknown Tibial Component | 7 | 200 | 0% | 0.5% |
| Foundation Knee | 6 | 0 | 0% | 2.7% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Manufacturers named
| Manufacturer (as written on reports) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Depuy Orthopaedics | 1,867 | 23% |
| Howmedica | 1,275 | 15.7% |
| Sulzer Orthopedics | 806 | 9.9% |
| Zimmer | 783 | 9.7% |
| Encore Medical L P | 330 | 4.1% |
| Howmedica Osteonics | 277 | 3.4% |
| Biomet | 232 | 2.9% |
| Stryker Orthopaedics Mahwah | 230 | 2.8% |
| Wright Medical Technology | 174 | 2.1% |
| Smith & Nephew Orthopaedic Div | 149 | 1.8% |
| Stryker Orthopaedics Cork | 145 | 1.8% |
| Stryker Orthopaedics Limerick | 141 | 1.7% |
| Exactech | 132 | 1.6% |
| Conformis | 76 | 0.9% |
| Depuy-Cork A Division Of Depuy Orthopaedics | 55 | 0.7% |
Reports by month, five years
FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
Event type and report source
Event type
Who filed
Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Explanted | 3,753 | 46.3% |
| Replace | 2,113 | 26.1% |
| Implant, removal of | 1,487 | 18.3% |
| Loose | 1,419 | 17.5% |
| Component(s), worn | 1,351 | 16.7% |
| Fitting problem | 340 | 4.2% |
| Breakthe device broke | 289 | 3.6% |
| Insufficient device problem information | 275 | 3.4% |
| Other (for use when an appropriate device code cannot be identified) | 218 | 2.7% |
| Fracturea broken bone | 214 | 2.6% |
| Naturally worn | 204 | 2.5% |
| Device slipped | 140 | 1.7% |
| Dislocated | 124 | 1.5% |
| Component(s), broken | 123 | 1.5% |
| Device issuea problem with the device | 120 | 1.5% |
| Device remains implanted | 105 | 1.3% |
| Material separation | 77 | 0.9% |
| Unstable | 70 | 0.9% |
| Loss of or failure to bond | 51 | 0.6% |
| Difficult to insertthe device was hard to insert | 50 | 0.6% |
Questions about prosthesis, knee, hemi-, tibial, resurfacing (uncemented) reports
What is product code HSH?
FDA's classification code for "Prosthesis, knee, hemi-, tibial, resurfacing (uncemented)", class 2, reviewed by the orthopedic panel. Every device report carries the product code of the device involved.
How many reports carry this code?
8,111 reports through August 2026, 0 of them in the latest 12 months.
Which brands appear most often?
Unknown Depuy Insert (293), Unknown Depuy Tibial Tray (266), Unknown Depuy Tibial Insert (205), Foundation Knee System (143) and Zimmer (142). Widely used products collect more reports because more people use them.
Can the brands table be used to rank the devices?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." Brands differ in how many are in use, how long they have been sold and how reports are collected.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.