Reported Reactions

Devices › Device types

FDA product code HSH · class 2 · Orthopedic

Prosthesis, knee, hemi-, tibial, resurfacing (uncemented): medical device reports filed with FDA

8,111 reports carry this product code, 1992–2022; 30 brands with a page.

8,111
reports with this product code
0% of all MAUDE reports
0
reports, 12 months to August 2026
0 in the 12 months before
13.3%
classified as malfunction
62.3% across all reports
0.1%
classified as death, as reported
0.9% across all reports

Product code HSH is FDA's classification for "Prosthesis, knee, hemi-, tibial, resurfacing (uncemented)" (orthopedic panel), a class 2 device. 8,111 medical device reports carry this product code, 0% of the MAUDE database, from March 1992 to August 2022.

0 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (80.6%), malfunction (13.3%) and other (5.4%). 30 brand names with a page on this site carry this code; the brands table is ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Brands with this product code

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as deathClassified as malfunction
Unknown Depuy Insert29300%0%
Unknown Depuy Tibial Tray26600%0.2%
Unknown Depuy Tibial Insert20500%0.1%
Foundation Knee System14300%3.8%
Zimmer14202.8%17.2%
Unk Depuy Insert10300%0%
Genesis4500.1%1.9%
Series 7000 Standard Tibia4500%7.8%
Journey4300%13.3%
Optetrak38150%3.5%
Biomet3400.3%20.5%
Triathlon Cr X3 Tibial Insert29130%8.4%
Mbt Cem Keel Tib Tray Sz32690%0.6%
Pca Knee1800%3%
Triathlon Ps X3 Tibial Insert18210%12.9%
Profix1500%0.1%
Unknown Tibial Tray15250.2%3%
Mbt Cem Keel Tib Tray Sz41440%0.2%
3dknee1200%0.7%
Triathlon Prim Tib Baseplate - Cemented1230.5%13.3%
Nexgen Stemmed Tibial Component1100%12.7%
Unknown Depuy Patella900%0%
Mbt Cem Keel Tib Tray Sz5830%1.3%
Pfc Keel Tib Tray Cem Sz3800%0.6%
Pfc Sigmarp Stb Tb In 3 10 0820%0%
Mbt Cem Keel Tib Tray Sz2 5760%0.3%
Nexgen Mis Stemmed Tibial Component700%10.5%
Pfc Sigma Mod Tib Tray Cem Sz4700%1.1%
Unknown Tibial Component72000%0.5%
Foundation Knee600%2.7%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Manufacturers named

Manufacturer (as written on reports)ReportsShare
Depuy Orthopaedics1,86723%
Howmedica1,27515.7%
Sulzer Orthopedics8069.9%
Zimmer7839.7%
Encore Medical L P3304.1%
Howmedica Osteonics2773.4%
Biomet2322.9%
Stryker Orthopaedics Mahwah2302.8%
Wright Medical Technology1742.1%
Smith & Nephew Orthopaedic Div1491.8%
Stryker Orthopaedics Cork1451.8%
Stryker Orthopaedics Limerick1411.7%
Exactech1321.6%
Conformis760.9%
Depuy-Cork A Division Of Depuy Orthopaedics550.7%

Reports by month, five years

011Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 0Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 0Aug 2022: 1Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 0Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 0Jun 2024: 0Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 0Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 0Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 0Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0

FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Event type and report source

Event type

Death0.1%7
Injury80.6%6,536
Malfunction13.3%1,076
Other5.4%439
Not given0.7%53

Who filed

Manufacturer report89.7%7,279
Voluntary report1.3%109
User facility report0%0
Distributor report4.3%351
Not given4.6%372

Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Explanted3,75346.3%
Replace2,11326.1%
Implant, removal of1,48718.3%
Loose1,41917.5%
Component(s), worn1,35116.7%
Fitting problem3404.2%
Breakthe device broke2893.6%
Insufficient device problem information2753.4%
Other (for use when an appropriate device code cannot be identified)2182.7%
Fracturea broken bone2142.6%
Naturally worn2042.5%
Device slipped1401.7%
Dislocated1241.5%
Component(s), broken1231.5%
Device issuea problem with the device1201.5%
Device remains implanted1051.3%
Material separation770.9%
Unstable700.9%
Loss of or failure to bond510.6%
Difficult to insertthe device was hard to insert500.6%

Questions about prosthesis, knee, hemi-, tibial, resurfacing (uncemented) reports

What is product code HSH?

FDA's classification code for "Prosthesis, knee, hemi-, tibial, resurfacing (uncemented)", class 2, reviewed by the orthopedic panel. Every device report carries the product code of the device involved.

How many reports carry this code?

8,111 reports through August 2026, 0 of them in the latest 12 months.

Which brands appear most often?

Unknown Depuy Insert (293), Unknown Depuy Tibial Tray (266), Unknown Depuy Tibial Insert (205), Foundation Knee System (143) and Zimmer (142). Widely used products collect more reports because more people use them.

Can the brands table be used to rank the devices?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." Brands differ in how many are in use, how long they have been sold and how reports are collected.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.