Reported Reactions

Drugs › Amide local anesthetic

Brand name · Lidocaine patch 5%

Lidoderm: adverse event reports filed with FDA

967 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2004–2026. Class: Amide local anesthetic. Also reported as Lidoderm Patch, Lidoderm 5.

967
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 43 a year
7
reports, 12 months to June 2026
17 in the 12 months before
45%
marked serious by the reporter
65.1% across the class
12.6%
record death among outcomes, as reported
122 reports · not verified by FDA

Between January 2004 and June 2026, 967 adverse event reports received by FDA list the brand name Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%) as a suspect or interacting product. Reports that mention it only as a concomitant medication (7,104) are left out of every figure here.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 7 reports listed it, down 59% from 17 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 43 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 2.3% of the reports for the amide local anesthetic class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

Reporters most often recorded drug ineffective for unapproved indication (7.8%), drug ineffective (7.7%) and pain (7.4%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 290 different terms appear across these reports. Drug ineffective for unapproved indication is recorded in 7.8% of these reports, a larger share than in the median amide local anesthetic drug (0.2%).

45% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (65.1% across the class); 12.6% record death among the outcomes and 10% record hospitalisation, as reported. 58.7% of the reports came from consumers, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (17.5%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

0611Jul 2021: 5Aug 2021: 3Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 4Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 42022Jan 2022: 4Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 5Apr 2022: 1May 2022: 2Jun 2022: 4Jul 2022: 3Aug 2022: 1Sep 2022: 5Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 1Dec 2022: 12023Jan 2023: 4Feb 2023: 1Mar 2023: 7Apr 2023: 11May 2023: 4Jun 2023: 4Jul 2023: 3Aug 2023: 1Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 10Nov 2023: 11Dec 2023: 42024Jan 2024: 1Feb 2024: 3Mar 2024: 2Apr 2024: 1May 2024: 3Jun 2024: 1Jul 2024: 2Aug 2024: 1Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 6Nov 2024: 3Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 1Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 3Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 1Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 0Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 1Oct 2025: 1Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 22026Jan 2026: 1Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 1Jun 2026: 1

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

0821642004: 320042005: 52006: 182007: 2820072008: 92009: 332010: 4020102011: 442012: 422013: 5120132014: 342015: 592016: 16420162017: 882018: 762019: 7120192020: 472021: 332022: 2720222023: 602024: 232025: 920252026: 3

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Lidoderm reports recording the termmedian drug in amide local anesthetic

  1. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected7.7%74
  2. Painpain, site not specified7.4%72
  3. Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term5.8%56
  4. Expired product administeredthe product was used past its expiry date4.9%47
  5. Drug hypersensitivityan allergic-type reaction to a medicine4%39
  6. Somnolencedrowsiness2.9%28
  7. Falla fall2.8%27
  8. Depressionlow mood2.4%23
  9. Insomniadifficulty sleeping2.4%23
  10. Nauseafeeling sick2.4%23
  11. Arthralgiajoint pain2.2%21
  12. Back painback pain2.1%20
  13. Dyspnoeashortness of breath2.1%20
  14. Malaisegeneral feeling of being unwell2.1%20
  15. Wrong technique in product usage processthe product was used in the wrong way2.1%20
  16. Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness1.9%18
  17. Weight decreasedweight loss1.9%18
  18. Pain in extremitypain in an arm or leg1.8%17
  19. Fatiguetiredness1.7%16
  20. Rashskin rash1.7%16
  21. Gait disturbancedifficulty walking1.6%15
  22. Headachehead pain1.6%15
  23. Confusional stateconfusion1.4%14

Top 30 of 290 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 13 drugs in the amide local anesthetic class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death12.6%122
Life-threatening1.2%12
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)10%97
Disability2.4%23
Congenital anomaly0.2%2
Other serious26.9%260
Not serious55%532

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 41,804 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20%0
2 to 110.2%2
12 to 170.4%4
18 to 445.9%57
45 to 6417.5%169
65 to 746.8%66
75 and over10.4%101
Age not given58.7%568

Patient sex

Female68.9%666
Male23.4%226
Not given7.8%75

Who reported

Physician7.9%76
Pharmacist5.7%55
Other health professional6.9%67
Lawyer0.8%8
Consumer or non-health professional58.7%568
Not given20%193

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 97.1% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Back pain11912.3%
Pain10210.5%
Arthralgia222.3%
Arthritis202.1%
Post herpetic neuralgia202.1%
Neuralgia171.8%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 967 reports.

In context

MeasureLidodermAmide local anestheticAll reports
Reports as suspect product96741,80420,646,523
Share of that pool—2.3%0%
Reports, latest 12 months7—1,332,454
Marked serious45%65.1%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports1267791
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports100250213
Consumer-filed share58.7%27%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsDrug ineffective for unapproved indication 7.8%median 0.2%0.3%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the amide local anesthetic class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Lidocainegeneric13,9931,46980%
Bupivacainegeneric5,44731083.3%
Lidocaine patchgeneric4,4741134.3%
Lidocaine hydrochloridegeneric3,04731480.7%
Exparelbrand2,15721742.4%
Marcainebrand2,0895044.1%
Xylocaine (lidocaine hcl )generic2,01510989.9%
Bupivacaine hclgeneric1,870045.3%
Lidocaine hclgeneric1,854049.5%
Bupivacaine hydrochloridegeneric1,79725162.3%
Ropivacaine hydrochloridegeneric1,38830094.2%
Naropinbrand7061379.7%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Lidoderm reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Lidoderm?

967 reports list Lidoderm as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 7 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 7,104 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Lidoderm reports?

drug ineffective for unapproved indication (7.8%), drug ineffective (7.7%), pain (7.4%), death (5.8%) and expired product administered (4.9%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Lidoderm was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

45% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 12.6% of reports include death and 10% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

consumer or non-health professional (58.7%), not given (20%) and physician (7.9%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Lidoderm rising?

7 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 59% from 17 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Lidoderm was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Lidoderm?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Lidoderm as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (7,104) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.