Product name as reported
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor: adverse event reports filed with FDA
1,043 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2010–2026. Also reported as Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Nos.
- 1,043
- reports as suspect product
- 0% of all reports · about 65 a year
- 151
- reports, 12 months to June 2026
- 186 in the 12 months before
- 99.2%
- marked serious by the reporter
- 57.4% across all reports
- 26.8%
- record death among outcomes, as reported
- 280 reports · not verified by FDA
Between May 2010 and June 2026, 1,043 adverse event reports received by FDA list the product name "Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor" as reporters wrote it as a suspect or interacting product. Reports that mention it only as a concomitant medication (2,684) are left out of every figure here.
In the 12 months to June 2026, 151 reports listed it, down 19% from 186 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 65 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.
The reactions recorded most often are febrile neutropenia (15.1%), haematotoxicity (10.4%) and off label use (9%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 348 different terms appear across these reports. Febrile neutropenia is recorded in 15.1% of these reports, against 0.3% of all reports in the database.
99.2% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter; 26.8% record death among the outcomes and 24.2% record hospitalisation, as reported. 53.6% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is 18 to 44 (18.2%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.
By year received
2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.
Reactions recorded in the reports
share of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor reports recording the termall reports in the database
- Febrile neutropeniafever with low white blood cells15.1%157
- Haematotoxicity10.4%108
- Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label9%94
- Disease progressionthe disease advanced6.6%69
- Neutropenialow neutrophils, a type of white blood cell6.5%68
- Thrombocytopenialow platelets6%63
- Sepsisa severe body-wide response to infection5.7%59
- Myelosuppression5.4%56
- Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term5.2%54
- Infectionan infection, type not specified5.2%54
- Product use in unapproved indicationused for a purpose not on the label5%52
- Pyrexiafever4.6%48
- Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected4.4%46
- Nauseafeeling sick4.4%46
- Pneumonialung infection4.1%43
- Anaemialow red blood cells3.8%40
- Diarrhoealoose or frequent stools3.8%40
- Mucosal inflammation3.8%40
- Cytomegalovirus infection reactivation2.9%30
- Acute kidney injurysudden loss of kidney function2.7%28
- Dyspnoeashortness of breath2.5%26
- Adenovirus infection2.4%25
- Ewing's sarcoma2.3%24
- Respiratory failurethe lungs could not supply enough oxygen2.3%24
- Intentional product use issuedeliberate use not as intended2.2%23
- Acute myeloid leukaemia2.1%22
- Vomitingbeing sick2.1%22
- Venoocclusive liver disease2%21
- Acute graft versus host disease in skin1.9%20
Top 30 of 348 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the share of all reports in the database; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."
Outcomes recorded
Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 20,646,523 reports. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."
Patients and reporters
Patient age
Patient sex
Who reported
Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 12.4% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.
Reason for use recorded
| Indication as recorded (MedDRA) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Acute myeloid leukaemia | 121 | 11.6% |
| Prophylaxis | 104 | 10% |
| Peripheral blood stem cell apheresis | 43 | 4.1% |
| Neutropenia | 38 | 3.6% |
| Stem cell therapy | 36 | 3.5% |
| Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma | 26 | 2.5% |
The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 1,043 reports.
In context
| Measure | Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor | All reports |
|---|---|---|
| Reports as suspect product | 1,043 | 20,646,523 |
| Share of that pool | — | 0% |
| Reports, latest 12 months | 151 | 1,332,454 |
| Marked serious | 99.2% | 57.4% |
| Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports | 268 | 91 |
| Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports | 242 | 213 |
| Consumer-filed share | 2.2% | 45.8% |
| Top term, share of reports | Febrile neutropenia 15.1% | 0.3% |
Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."
Questions about Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor reports
How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor?
1,043 reports list Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 151 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 2,684 list it only as a concomitant medication.
What reactions are recorded in Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor reports?
febrile neutropenia (15.1%), haematotoxicity (10.4%), off label use (9%), disease progression (6.6%) and neutropenia (6.5%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor was responsible.
How serious are the reports?
99.2% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 26.8% of reports include death and 24.2% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.
Who files these reports?
other health professional (53.6%), physician (42.7%) and consumer or non-health professional (2.2%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.
Are reports for Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor rising?
151 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 19% from 186 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.
Do these reports show that Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor was responsible for these reactions?
No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.
Is this a list of the side effects of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor?
No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.
How do I report an adverse event?
Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (2,684) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.