Reported Reactions

Drugs › Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor

Brand name · Crisaborole

Eucrisa: adverse event reports filed with FDA

7,751 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2017–2026. Class: Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor.

7,751
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 817 a year
92
reports, 12 months to June 2026
238 in the 12 months before
5.1%
marked serious by the reporter
23% across the class
0.3%
record death among outcomes, as reported
22 reports · not verified by FDA

Between January 2017 and June 2026, 7,751 adverse event reports received by FDA list the brand name Eucrisa (crisaborole) as a suspect or interacting product. Reports that mention it only as a concomitant medication (1,625) are left out of every figure here.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 92 reports listed it, down 61% from 238 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 817 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 5.1% of the reports for the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

The reactions recorded most often are drug ineffective (23.3%), application site pain (18.1%) and burning sensation (12.5%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 333 different terms appear across these reports. Drug ineffective is recorded in 23.3% of these reports, a larger share than in the median phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor drug (10%).

5.1% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (23% across the class); 0.3% record death among the outcomes and 0.7% record hospitalisation, as reported. 56.9% of the reports came from consumers, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (18.2%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

076151Jul 2021: 12Aug 2021: 7Sep 2021: 13Oct 2021: 13Nov 2021: 32Dec 2021: 122022Jan 2022: 23Feb 2022: 9Mar 2022: 66Apr 2022: 151May 2022: 139Jun 2022: 45Jul 2022: 32Aug 2022: 36Sep 2022: 28Oct 2022: 39Nov 2022: 50Dec 2022: 372023Jan 2023: 33Feb 2023: 51Mar 2023: 47Apr 2023: 35May 2023: 47Jun 2023: 24Jul 2023: 34Aug 2023: 37Sep 2023: 37Oct 2023: 34Nov 2023: 18Dec 2023: 252024Jan 2024: 39Feb 2024: 22Mar 2024: 24Apr 2024: 27May 2024: 21Jun 2024: 28Jul 2024: 28Aug 2024: 26Sep 2024: 21Oct 2024: 22Nov 2024: 19Dec 2024: 182025Jan 2025: 19Feb 2025: 22Mar 2025: 18Apr 2025: 20May 2025: 12Jun 2025: 13Jul 2025: 13Aug 2025: 18Sep 2025: 16Oct 2025: 18Nov 2025: 8Dec 2025: 42026Jan 2026: 2Feb 2026: 4Mar 2026: 3Apr 2026: 2May 2026: 2Jun 2026: 2

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

09791,9582017: 1,25320172018: 1,95820182019: 1,81520192020: 89220202021: 26520212022: 65520222023: 42220232024: 29520242025: 18120252026: 152026

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Eucrisa reports recording the termmedian drug in phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor

  1. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected23.3%1,806
  2. Burning sensationa burning feeling12.5%970
  3. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label8.4%648
  4. Condition aggravatedthe condition being treated got worse7.9%612
  5. Painpain, site not specified5.9%461
  6. Pruritusitching4.8%370
  7. Rashskin rash4.4%343
  8. Eczemaeczema4%308
  9. Erythemaskin redness3.6%280
  10. Product use in unapproved indicationused for a purpose not on the label3%235
  11. Drug hypersensitivityan allergic-type reaction to a medicine3%234
  12. Application site erythemaredness where the product was applied3%231
  13. Skin burning sensationburning skin2.7%212
  14. Product use issuea problem in how the product was used1.8%139
  15. Application site pruritusitching where the product was applied1.8%137
  16. Hypersensitivityan allergic-type reaction1.5%118
  17. Urticariahives1.5%117
  18. Dry skindry skin1.4%108
  19. Treatment failurethe treatment did not work1.2%96
  20. Skin exfoliationpeeling skin1.2%95
  21. Skin irritationirritated skin1.1%85
  22. Application site swelling1%77
  23. Intentional product misusedeliberate use not as intended1%77
  24. Skin discolourationa change in skin colour0.9%73

Top 30 of 333 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 5 drugs in the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death0.3%22
Life-threatening0%2
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)0.7%53
Disability0.1%11
Congenital anomaly0%0
Other serious4.4%341
Not serious94.9%7,357

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 152,432 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 23.2%247
2 to 1114.5%1,121
12 to 176.6%512
18 to 4416.1%1,250
45 to 6418.2%1,411
65 to 749.8%758
75 and over5.3%414
Age not given26.3%2,038

Patient sex

Female57.2%4,433
Male30.2%2,337
Not given12.7%981

Who reported

Physician25%1,941
Pharmacist1.4%105
Other health professional16.7%1,294
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional56.9%4,407
Not given0.1%4

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 99.1% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Dermatitis atopic1,94425.1%
Eczema1,03413.3%
Dermatitis3554.6%
Rash1572%
Psoriasis1011.3%
Dermatitis allergic610.8%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 7,751 reports.

Drugs most often listed in the same reports

Drug (any role in the report)ReportsShare of Eucrisa reports
Dupixent921.2%
Triamcinolone630.8%
Clobetasol510.7%
Prednisone330.4%
Tacrolimus330.4%
Protopic240.3%
Zyrtec210.3%
Hydrocortisone190.2%
Triamcinolone acetonide180.2%
Desonide160.2%

Other products listed in reports where Eucrisa is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.

In context

MeasureEucrisaPhosphodiesterase 4 inhibitorAll reports
Reports as suspect product7,751152,43220,646,523
Share of that pool—5.1%0%
Reports, latest 12 months92—1,332,454
Marked serious5.1%23%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports34891
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports781213
Consumer-filed share56.9%24.7%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsDrug ineffective 23.3%median 10%6.3%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Otezlabrand135,7103,34420.6%
Apremilastgeneric5,24788077.5%
Dalirespbrand2,4431458.4%
Roflumilastgeneric1,28111292.7%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Eucrisa reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Eucrisa?

7,751 reports list Eucrisa as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 92 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 1,625 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Eucrisa reports?

drug ineffective (23.3%), application site pain (18.1%), burning sensation (12.5%), off label use (8.4%) and condition aggravated (7.9%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Eucrisa was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

5.1% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 0.3% of reports include death and 0.7% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

consumer or non-health professional (56.9%), physician (25%) and other health professional (16.7%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Eucrisa rising?

92 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 61% from 238 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Eucrisa was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Eucrisa?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Eucrisa as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (1,625) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.