Brand name · Tesamorelin
Egrifta Sv: adverse event reports filed with FDA
1,482 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2019–2026.
- 1,482
- reports as suspect product
- 0% of all reports · about 225 a year
- 159
- reports, 12 months to June 2026
- 324 in the 12 months before
- 20.2%
- marked serious by the reporter
- 57.4% across all reports
- 2%
- record death among outcomes, as reported
- 29 reports · not verified by FDA
Between December 2019 and June 2026, 1,482 adverse event reports received by FDA list the brand name Egrifta Sv (tesamorelin) as a suspect or interacting product. Reports that mention it only as a concomitant medication (10) are left out of every figure here.
In the 12 months to June 2026, 159 reports listed it, down 51% from 324 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 225 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.
The reactions recorded most often are product dose omission issue (18.5%), incorrect dose administered (11%) and drug ineffective (8.4%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 239 different terms appear across these reports. Product dose omission issue is recorded in 18.5% of these reports, against 1.4% of all reports in the database.
20.2% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter; 2% record death among the outcomes and 7.6% record hospitalisation, as reported. 76% of the reports came from consumers, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (6.5%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.
By year received
2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.
Reactions recorded in the reports
share of Egrifta Sv reports recording the termall reports in the database
- Product dose omission issuea dose was missed18.5%274
- Incorrect dose administeredthe wrong dose was given11%163
- Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected8.4%124
- Injection site painpain where the injection was given8.4%124
- Product preparation issuea problem preparing the product8.1%120
- Weight increasedweight gain6.5%96
- Arthralgiajoint pain6.1%90
- Injection site bruisingbruising where the injection was given5.7%85
- Wrong technique in product usage processthe product was used in the wrong way5%74
- Injection site pruritusitching where the injection was given4.9%73
- Pain in extremitypain in an arm or leg4.7%69
- Fatiguetiredness3.7%55
- Peripheral swellingswelling of the arms or legs3.6%53
- Myalgiamuscle pain3.1%46
- Pruritusitching3.1%46
- Painpain, site not specified3%45
- Injection site mass2.7%40
- Back painback pain2.4%35
- Hypoaesthesianumbness2.2%33
- Diarrhoealoose or frequent stools2.2%32
- Treatment noncompliancethe treatment was not taken as directed2.2%32
- Abdominal distensiona bloated abdomen2.1%31
- Blood glucose increasedraised blood sugar reading2.1%31
- Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness2%30
- Product administration errora mistake in giving the product2%30
- Weight decreasedweight loss2%30
- Headachehead pain2%29
Top 30 of 239 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the share of all reports in the database; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."
Outcomes recorded
Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 20,646,523 reports. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."
Patients and reporters
Patient age
Patient sex
Who reported
Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 100% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.
Reason for use recorded
| Indication as recorded (MedDRA) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Lipodystrophy acquired | 1,064 | 71.8% |
| Hiv infection | 78 | 5.3% |
| Hiv lipodystrophy | 17 | 1.1% |
| Lipohypertrophy | 2 | 0.1% |
The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 1,482 reports.
Drugs most often listed in the same reports
| Drug (any role in the report) | Reports | Share of Egrifta Sv reports |
|---|---|---|
| Biktarvy | 60 | 4% |
| Atorvastatin | 54 | 3.6% |
| Gabapentin | 46 | 3.1% |
| Aspirin | 38 | 2.6% |
| Tivicay | 37 | 2.5% |
| Lisinopril | 34 | 2.3% |
| Dovato | 33 | 2.2% |
| Testosterone | 33 | 2.2% |
| Omeprazole | 32 | 2.2% |
| Metformin | 29 | 2% |
Other products listed in reports where Egrifta Sv is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.
In context
| Measure | Egrifta Sv | All reports |
|---|---|---|
| Reports as suspect product | 1,482 | 20,646,523 |
| Share of that pool | — | 0% |
| Reports, latest 12 months | 159 | 1,332,454 |
| Marked serious | 20.2% | 57.4% |
| Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports | 20 | 91 |
| Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports | 76 | 213 |
| Consumer-filed share | 76% | 45.8% |
| Top term, share of reports | Product dose omission issue 18.5% | 1.4% |
Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."
Questions about Egrifta Sv reports
How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Egrifta Sv?
1,482 reports list Egrifta Sv as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 159 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 10 list it only as a concomitant medication.
What reactions are recorded in Egrifta Sv reports?
product dose omission issue (18.5%), incorrect dose administered (11%), drug ineffective (8.4%), injection site pain (8.4%) and product preparation issue (8.1%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Egrifta Sv was responsible.
How serious are the reports?
20.2% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 2% of reports include death and 7.6% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.
Who files these reports?
consumer or non-health professional (76%), other health professional (13.8%) and physician (7.4%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.
Are reports for Egrifta Sv rising?
159 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 51% from 324 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.
Do these reports show that Egrifta Sv was responsible for these reactions?
No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.
Is this a list of the side effects of Egrifta Sv?
No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.
How do I report an adverse event?
Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Egrifta Sv as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (10) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.