Reported Reactions

Drugs

Product name as reported

Duragesic-100: adverse event reports filed with FDA

9,772 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2004–2012.

9,772
reports as suspect product
0.1% of all reports · about 453 a year
0
reports, 12 months to June 2026
0 in the 12 months before
63.5%
marked serious by the reporter
57.4% across all reports
11.5%
record death among outcomes, as reported
1,123 reports · not verified by FDA

9,772 adverse event reports received by FDA list the product name "Duragesic-100" as reporters wrote it as a suspect or interacting product, from December 2004 to August 2012. A further 3,271 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 0 reports listed it, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 453 reports a year and 0.1% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

The MedDRA terms listed most often are wrong technique in drug usage process (30.2%), product quality issue (14.3%) and inappropriate schedule of drug administration (11.7%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 1,026 different terms appear across these reports. Wrong technique in drug usage process is recorded in 30.2% of these reports, against 0.2% of all reports in the database.

63.5% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter; 11.5% record death among the outcomes and 29.2% record hospitalisation, as reported. 62.9% of the reports came from consumers, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (7.6%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

No report listing Duragesic-100 was received in the five years to June 2026; the latest was received in August 2012.

By year received

01,1342,2672004: 120042005: 81620052006: 81620062007: 80220072008: 1,25920082009: 2,26720092010: 1,83720102011: 1,07320112012: 9012012

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Duragesic-100 reports recording the termall reports in the database

  1. Wrong technique in drug usage processthe medicine was used in the wrong way30.2%2,955
  2. Product quality issuea problem with the product itself14.3%1,394
  3. Inappropriate schedule of drug administrationthe medicine was taken at the wrong times11.7%1,145
  4. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected10.2%1,001
  5. Painpain, site not specified8%777
  6. Nauseafeeling sick6.4%625
  7. Hyperhidrosisexcessive sweating5.5%539
  8. Vomitingbeing sick5.1%495
  9. Somnolencedrowsiness4%395
  10. Drug dose omissiona dose was missed3.9%381
  11. Overdosea dose above the recommended amount3.6%349
  12. Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness3.5%343
  13. Falla fall3.4%332
  14. Drug prescribing errora prescribing mistake3.4%329
  15. Depressionlow mood3.3%324
  16. Weight decreasedweight loss3.3%320
  17. Insomniadifficulty sleeping3.1%301
  18. Malaisegeneral feeling of being unwell3.1%299
  19. Dyspnoeashortness of breath2.9%288
  20. Drug effect decreasedthe medicine had less effect2.9%283
  21. Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term2.8%276
  22. Therapeutic response decreasedthe medicine worked less well2.8%271
  23. Hypertensionhigh blood pressure2.5%243
  24. Headachehead pain2.5%242

Top 30 of 1,026 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the share of all reports in the database; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death11.5%1,123
Life-threatening2.6%252
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)29.2%2,851
Disability1.2%121
Congenital anomaly0%4
Other serious30.4%2,972
Not serious36.5%3,571

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 20,646,523 reports. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20.1%8
2 to 110.2%20
12 to 170.2%23
18 to 444.4%428
45 to 647.6%739
65 to 743.2%314
75 and over5%491
Age not given79.3%7,749

Patient sex

Female60.2%5,887
Male35.8%3,501
Not given3.9%384

Who reported

Physician14.2%1,387
Pharmacist10.8%1,059
Other health professional10.1%987
Lawyer0.4%42
Consumer or non-health professional62.9%6,146
Not given1.5%151

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 65.8% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Pain2,26923.2%
Back pain1,03010.5%
Cancer pain2742.8%
Pain management2562.6%
Fibromyalgia1491.5%
Arthralgia1221.2%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 9,772 reports.

In context

MeasureDuragesic-100All reports
Reports as suspect product9,77220,646,523
Share of that pool—0.1%
Reports, latest 12 months01,332,454
Marked serious63.5%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports11591
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports292213
Consumer-filed share62.9%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsWrong technique in drug usage process 30.2%0.2%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Questions about Duragesic-100 reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Duragesic-100?

9,772 reports list Duragesic-100 as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 0 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 3,271 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Duragesic-100 reports?

wrong technique in drug usage process (30.2%), product quality issue (14.3%), inappropriate schedule of drug administration (11.7%), drug ineffective (10.2%) and pain (8%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Duragesic-100 was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

63.5% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 11.5% of reports include death and 29.2% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

consumer or non-health professional (62.9%), physician (14.2%) and pharmacist (10.8%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Duragesic-100 rising?

0 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Duragesic-100 was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Duragesic-100?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Duragesic-100 as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (3,271) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.