Reported Reactions

Devices › Stent, iliac

Device brand name · Nio stent iliac

Zilver Flex 35 Vascular Self-Expanding Stent: medical device reports filed with FDA

203 reports name it, 2013–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Cook Ireland. Product code NIO.

203
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 15 a year
23
reports, 12 months to August 2026
42 in the 12 months before
52.7%
classified as malfunction
54.5% across the product code
0.5%
classified as death, as reported
1 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 203 reports that name the brand "Zilver Flex 35 Vascular Self-Expanding Stent" (nio stent iliac), received between May 2013 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Cook Ireland. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

23 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 45% from 42 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (52.7%), injury (46.8%) and death (0.5%); across all stent, iliac reports (product code NIO) death is recorded in 2.9% and malfunction in 54.5%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are off-label use (26.1%), improper or incorrect procedure or method (9.4%) and structural problem (5.4%). The patient problems coded most often are obstruction/occlusion, restenosis and thrombosis/thrombus. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

0815Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 3Nov 2021: 1Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 1Feb 2022: 1Mar 2022: 4Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 1Jul 2022: 15Aug 2022: 2Sep 2022: 1Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 3Dec 2022: 22023Jan 2023: 2Feb 2023: 1Mar 2023: 2Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 2Jun 2023: 6Jul 2023: 2Aug 2023: 2Sep 2023: 2Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 32024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 2Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 2May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 10Jul 2024: 3Aug 2024: 3Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 3Nov 2024: 3Dec 2024: 152025Jan 2025: 3Feb 2025: 2Mar 2025: 2Apr 2025: 3May 2025: 1Jun 2025: 1Jul 2025: 4Aug 2025: 5Sep 2025: 5Oct 2025: 8Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 12026Jan 2026: 1Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 1May 2026: 4Jun 2026: 1Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 2

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

021422013: 320132016: 62017: 320172018: 72019: 820192020: 152021: 2120212022: 302023: 2420232024: 422025: 3520252026: 9

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0.5%1
Injury46.8%95
Malfunction52.7%107
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report98.5%200
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report1.5%3
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 7,265 reports carrying product code NIO. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Off-label use5326.1%3.3%
Improper or incorrect procedure or method199.4%5.3%
Structural problem115.4%0.2%
Fracturea broken bone73.4%2.8%
Premature activation73.4%7.5%
Deformation due to compressive stress63%0.7%
Physical resistance/sticking63%1.5%
Device damaged prior to usethe device was damaged before use52.5%0.9%
Activation, positioning or separation problem42%5%
Complete blockage42%0.2%
Activation failure31.5%5.8%
Breakthe device broke31.5%3.6%
Material twisted/bent31.5%0.2%
Failure to align21%0.1%
Partial blockage21%0.2%
Stretched21%1%
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off10.5%3.5%
Difficult to advance10.5%4.2%
Material deformation10.5%5.8%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Obstruction/occlusion4120.2%
Restenosis3115.3%
Thrombosis/thrombus94.4%
Painpain, site not specified42%
Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding31.5%
Ischemia31.5%
Stenosis31.5%
Embolism/embolus21%
Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient21%
No patient involvement21%
Post operative wound infection21%
Chillschills or shivering10.5%
Fistula10.5%
Hematomaa collection of blood under the skin or in tissue10.5%
Occlusion10.5%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureZilver Flex 35 Vascular Self-Expanding StentProduct code NIOAll MAUDE reports
Reports2037,26526,136,888
Share of that pool—2.8%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports5299
Classified as injury46.8%42.3%36.2%
Classified as malfunction52.7%54.5%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer98.5%98.7%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code NIO

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Omnilink Elite Peripheral Stent System84100.6%
Smart Control Nitinol Stent System1,43801.7%
Epic? Vascular454181.8%
E-Luminexx Vascular Stent472325.1%
Express LD Iliac / Biliary420151.4%
Absolute Pro Vascular Self-Expanding Stent System52001%
Epic429321.2%
Complete Se Iliac34105%
Omnilink Elite2631152.3%
Advanta V12 Covered Stent340012.6%
Absolute Pro2521361.6%
Visi-Pro Balloon-Expandable Stent System319244.1%
GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endoprosthesis1,4852954.9%
Assurant Cobalt16901.2%
Absolute Pro .035 Self Expanding Stent System858380.2%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Zilver Flex 35 Vascular Self-Expanding Stent reports

How many FDA reports name Zilver Flex 35 Vascular Self-Expanding Stent?

203 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 23 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (52.7%), injury (46.8%) and death (0.5%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

off-label use (26.1%), improper or incorrect procedure or method (9.4%), structural problem (5.4%), fracture (3.4%) and premature activation (3.4%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (98.5%) and distributor reports (1.5%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Zilver Flex 35 Vascular Self-Expanding Stent was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.