Reported Reactions

Devices › Prosthesis, tracheal, expandable

Device brand name · Prosthesis tracheal expandable

Ultraflex Tracheobronchial: medical device reports filed with FDA

713 reports name it, 2011–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Boston Scientific - Galway. Product code JCT.

713
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 47 a year
51
reports, 12 months to August 2026
34 in the 12 months before
59.5%
classified as malfunction
52.9% across the product code
0.3%
classified as death, as reported
2 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 713 reports that name the brand "Ultraflex Tracheobronchial" (prosthesis tracheal expandable), received between June 2011 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Boston Scientific - Galway. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

51 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 50% from 34 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (59.5%), injury (40.1%) and death (0.3%); across all prosthesis, tracheal, expandable reports (product code JCT) death is recorded in 3.6% and malfunction in 52.9%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are activation, positioning or separation problem (47.3%), positioning problem (16.7%) and activation failure (14.4%). The patient problems coded most often are hemoptysis, dyspnea and hypoxia. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

01325Sep 2021: 2Oct 2021: 2Nov 2021: 1Dec 2021: 32022Jan 2022: 4Feb 2022: 2Mar 2022: 1Apr 2022: 1May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 2Jul 2022: 4Aug 2022: 4Sep 2022: 1Oct 2022: 1Nov 2022: 2Dec 2022: 42023Jan 2023: 5Feb 2023: 5Mar 2023: 8Apr 2023: 5May 2023: 5Jun 2023: 5Jul 2023: 4Aug 2023: 5Sep 2023: 4Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 92024Jan 2024: 3Feb 2024: 8Mar 2024: 7Apr 2024: 6May 2024: 5Jun 2024: 3Jul 2024: 8Aug 2024: 4Sep 2024: 4Oct 2024: 4Nov 2024: 2Dec 2024: 12025Jan 2025: 6Feb 2025: 2Mar 2025: 1Apr 2025: 4May 2025: 2Jun 2025: 3Jul 2025: 5Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 1Oct 2025: 2Nov 2025: 2Dec 2025: 32026Jan 2026: 3Feb 2026: 1Mar 2026: 2Apr 2026: 2May 2026: 5Jun 2026: 3Jul 2026: 25Aug 2026: 2

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

049982011: 1820112012: 412013: 3720132014: 302015: 7320152016: 982017: 4720172018: 372019: 3420192020: 552021: 3220212022: 262023: 5620232024: 552025: 3120252026: 43

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0.3%2
Injury40.1%286
Malfunction59.5%424
Other0%0
Not given0.1%1

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report99.7%711
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0.3%2

Grey bar: all 3,011 reports carrying product code JCT. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Activation, positioning or separation problem33747.3%13.9%
Positioning problem11916.7%5.5%
Activation failure10314.4%4%
Breakthe device broke9613.5%7.8%
Material deformation8812.3%4.1%
Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove354.9%4.6%
Positioning failure344.8%13.4%
Material twisted/bent273.8%0.9%
Unraveled material223.1%0.8%
Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed162.2%1.3%
Failure to advance121.7%2.1%
Material integrity problema problem with the device material121.7%0.5%
Premature activation111.5%1.6%
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off91.3%1.4%
Migration or expulsion of device91.3%3.8%
Component missing60.8%0.2%
Defective devicethe device was defective50.7%0.5%
Kinkedthe tube or line kinked50.7%0.9%
Difficult or delayed positioning40.6%3.7%
Difficult to advance40.6%0.6%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Hemoptysis121.7%
Dyspneashortness of breath81.1%
Hypoxialow oxygen60.8%
Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding50.7%
Pneumonialung infection50.7%
Discomfortdiscomfort40.6%
Inflammationinflammation40.6%
Pneumothoraxa collapsed lung40.6%
Fistula30.4%
Abscessa collection of pus20.3%
Bradycardiaslow heart rate20.3%
Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term20.3%
Heart failure20.3%
Injurya physical injury20.3%
Respiratory distressdifficulty breathing20.3%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureUltraflex TracheobronchialProduct code JCTAll MAUDE reports
Reports7133,01126,136,888
Share of that pool—23.7%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports3369
Classified as injury40.1%42.3%36.2%
Classified as malfunction59.5%52.9%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer99.7%95.7%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code JCT

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Fluency Plus Tracheobronchial Stent Graft32300%
Icast Covered Stent24509.8%
Atrium Icast Covered Stent20800.5%
WALLSTENT Endoprosthesis364141.4%
GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis985185.8%
Ultraflex19804.5%
Wallstent Enteral Endoprosthesis162010.5%
Wallstent Biliary16150.6%
Advanta V12 Covered Stent340012.6%
Wallstent Endoprosthesis With Unistep Plus Delivery System20602.9%
Wallstent Rx Biliary Endoprosthesis18700.5%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Ultraflex Tracheobronchial reports

How many FDA reports name Ultraflex Tracheobronchial?

713 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 51 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (59.5%), injury (40.1%) and death (0.3%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

activation, positioning or separation problem (47.3%), positioning problem (16.7%), activation failure (14.4%), break (13.5%) and material deformation (12.3%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (99.7%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Ultraflex Tracheobronchial was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.