Device brand name · Ligator esophageal
Speedband Superview Super 7: medical device reports filed with FDA
6,088 reports name it, 2006–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Boston Scientific. Product code MND.
- 6,088
- device reports naming the brand
- 0% of all MAUDE reports · about 299 a year
- 640
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 826 in the 12 months before
- 97.5%
- classified as malfunction
- 90.4% across the product code
- 0.2%
- classified as death, as reported
- 11 reports · not verified by FDA
6,088 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Speedband Superview Super 7" (ligator esophageal); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Boston Scientific; received from March 2006 to August 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.
640 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 23% from 826 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (97.5%), injury (2.3%) and death (0.2%); across all ligator, esophageal reports (product code MND) death is recorded in 0.7% and malfunction in 90.4%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.
The device problems coded most often are failure to fire (58.8%), positioning failure (14.6%) and premature activation (13.2%). The patient problems coded most often are hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding, no patient involvement and tissue damage. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
By year received
Event type and report source
Event type, as classified on the report
Who filed the report
Grey bar: all 10,742 reports carrying product code MND. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share | Share across product code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Failure to fire | 3,577 | 58.8% | 33.1% |
| Positioning failure | 891 | 14.6% | 9.4% |
| Premature activation | 801 | 13.2% | 10.7% |
| Breakthe device broke | 639 | 10.5% | 7.3% |
| Material integrity problema problem with the device material | 285 | 4.7% | 2.7% |
| Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off | 172 | 2.8% | 2% |
| Human-device interface problem | 161 | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Difficult or delayed positioning | 128 | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Misfire | 109 | 1.8% | 2% |
| Defective devicethe device was defective | 94 | 1.5% | 0.7% |
| Device difficult to setup or prepare | 88 | 1.4% | 0.8% |
| Failure to adhere or bond | 58 | 1% | 0.1% |
| Material deformation | 49 | 0.8% | 0.5% |
| Activation, positioning or separation problem | 38 | 0.6% | 1.8% |
| Entrapment of device | 26 | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| Detachment of device component | 18 | 0.3% | 4.2% |
| Device contamination with chemical or other material | 17 | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove | 17 | 0.3% | 1.3% |
| Material separation | 17 | 0.3% | 3.1% |
| Suction problem | 16 | 0.3% | 0.3% |
FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.
Patient problems coded
| Patient problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding | 125 | 2.1% |
| No patient involvement | 10 | 0.2% |
| Tissue damage | 7 | 0.1% |
| Blood loss | 6 | 0.1% |
| Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term | 6 | 0.1% |
| Therapy/non-surgical treatment, additional | 5 | 0.1% |
| Bleeding | 4 | 0.1% |
| Cardiac arrestthe heart stopped | 4 | 0.1% |
| Foreign body, removal of | 4 | 0.1% |
| Hospitalization required | 4 | 0.1% |
| Laceration(s) | 4 | 0.1% |
| Dysphagia/ odynophagia | 3 | 0% |
| Abrasion | 2 | 0% |
| Bradycardiaslow heart rate | 2 | 0% |
| Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient | 2 | 0% |
Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.
In context
| Measure | Speedband Superview Super 7 | Product code MND | All MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | 6,088 | 10,742 | 26,136,888 |
| Share of that pool | — | 56.7% | 0% |
| Classified as death, per 1,000 reports | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Classified as injury | 2.3% | 8.7% | 36.2% |
| Classified as malfunction | 97.5% | 90.4% | 62.3% |
| Filed by the manufacturer | 99.4% | 98.2% | 94.9% |
Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Other brands with product code MND
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Shooter Saeed Multi-Band Ligator | 1,440 | 92 | 0.1% |
| Resolution Clip Device | 1,596 | 0 | 0.3% |
| Resolution Clip Clipping Device | 2,382 | 28 | 0.1% |
| Resolution Hemostasis Clipping Device | 674 | 0 | 1.5% |
| Single Use Ligating Device | 594 | 170 | 0% |
| Instinct Endoscopic Hemoclip | 784 | 0 | 0.1% |
| Resolution Clip | 884 | 36 | 0.1% |
| Olympus | 2,240 | 9 | 2.5% |
| Instinct | 1,215 | 1,171 | 0% |
| Cook | 271 | 6 | 2.2% |
| Gold Probe | 236 | 15 | 0% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."
Questions about Speedband Superview Super 7 reports
How many FDA reports name Speedband Superview Super 7?
6,088 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 640 in the latest 12 months.
What kinds of events are reported?
malfunction (97.5%), injury (2.3%) and death (0.2%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.
What device problems are coded?
failure to fire (58.8%), positioning failure (14.6%), premature activation (13.2%), break (10.5%) and material integrity problem (4.7%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.
Who files these reports?
manufacturer reports (99.4%) and voluntary reports (0.2%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.
Do these reports show that Speedband Superview Super 7 was at fault?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."
How do I report a problem with a medical device?
Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.