Reported Reactions

Devices › Hemostatic metal clip for the gi tract

Device brand name · Hemostatic metal clip for the gi tract

Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip: medical device reports filed with FDA

608 reports name it, 2020–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Boston Scientific. Product code PKL.

608
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 107 a year
116
reports, 12 months to August 2026
119 in the 12 months before
96.2%
classified as malfunction
90.9% across the product code
1%
classified as death, as reported
6 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 608 reports that name the brand "Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip" (hemostatic metal clip for the gi tract), received between November 2020 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Boston Scientific. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

116 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, close to the 119 of the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (96.2%), injury (2.6%) and death (1%); across all hemostatic metal clip for the gi tract reports (product code PKL) death is recorded in 0.3% and malfunction in 90.9%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are activation, positioning or separation problem (69.1%), premature activation (13.7%) and break (6.4%). The patient problems coded most often are hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding, foreign body in patient and perforation. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

01223Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 6Nov 2021: 6Dec 2021: 22022Jan 2022: 4Feb 2022: 3Mar 2022: 2Apr 2022: 3May 2022: 4Jun 2022: 5Jul 2022: 5Aug 2022: 3Sep 2022: 3Oct 2022: 4Nov 2022: 3Dec 2022: 72023Jan 2023: 8Feb 2023: 8Mar 2023: 15Apr 2023: 11May 2023: 11Jun 2023: 8Jul 2023: 16Aug 2023: 21Sep 2023: 23Oct 2023: 20Nov 2023: 11Dec 2023: 202024Jan 2024: 8Feb 2024: 19Mar 2024: 11Apr 2024: 16May 2024: 15Jun 2024: 15Jul 2024: 13Aug 2024: 18Sep 2024: 13Oct 2024: 9Nov 2024: 4Dec 2024: 72025Jan 2025: 15Feb 2025: 8Mar 2025: 9Apr 2025: 7May 2025: 6Jun 2025: 11Jul 2025: 9Aug 2025: 21Sep 2025: 13Oct 2025: 7Nov 2025: 9Dec 2025: 92026Jan 2026: 10Feb 2026: 9Mar 2026: 5Apr 2026: 15May 2026: 5Jun 2026: 14Jul 2026: 13Aug 2026: 7

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

0861722020: 320202021: 3720212022: 4620222023: 17220232024: 14820242025: 12420252026: 782026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death1%6
Injury2.6%16
Malfunction96.2%585
Other0.2%1
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report90.5%550
Voluntary report2.1%13
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given7.4%45

Grey bar: all 7,243 reports carrying product code PKL. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Activation, positioning or separation problem42069.1%52.8%
Premature activation8313.7%7.1%
Breakthe device broke396.4%5.8%
Difficult to open or close386.3%13.6%
Positioning failure274.4%1.7%
Human-device interface problem223.6%1.7%
Entrapment of device183%1.5%
Material twisted/bent132.1%1.4%
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off81.3%2.8%
Defective devicethe device was defective50.8%0.4%
Material deformation40.7%1.6%
Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove30.5%0.6%
Material integrity problema problem with the device material30.5%0.2%
Mechanical problema mechanical problem30.5%0.5%
Device dislodged or dislocated20.3%0.3%
Material separation20.3%9.3%
Physical resistance/sticking20.3%0.3%
Device-device incompatibility10.2%0.1%
Difficult or delayed activation10.2%0%
Firing problem10.2%0.2%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding274.4%
Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient91.5%
Perforation50.8%
Low blood pressure/ hypotension30.5%
Abdominal painstomach or belly pain10.2%
Adhesion(s)10.2%
Aspiration/inhalation10.2%
Fluid discharge10.2%
Hematomaa collection of blood under the skin or in tissue10.2%
Inflammationinflammation10.2%
Sepsisa severe body-wide response to infection10.2%
Stenosis10.2%
Stroke/cva10.2%
Ulcer10.2%
Vomitingbeing sick10.2%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureResolution 360 ULTRA ClipProduct code PKLAll MAUDE reports
Reports6087,24326,136,888
Share of that pool—8.4%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports1039
Classified as injury2.6%8.7%36.2%
Classified as malfunction96.2%90.9%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer90.5%93.9%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code PKL

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Resolution 360 Clip2,9573850.2%
Instinct Plus Endoscopic Clipping Device1,2252290%
Resolution Clip884360.1%
Instinct Endoscopic Hemoclip78400.1%
Single Use Repositionable Clip27500%
Mantis173330.6%
Resolution Clip Clipping Device2,382280.1%
Instinct1,2151,1710%
6 Shooter Saeed Multi-Band Ligator1,440920.1%
Boston Scientific58053.3%
Hemospray Endoscopic Hemostat1,0521160.9%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip reports

How many FDA reports name Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip?

608 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 116 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (96.2%), injury (2.6%) and death (1%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

activation, positioning or separation problem (69.1%), premature activation (13.7%), break (6.4%), difficult to open or close (6.3%) and positioning failure (4.4%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (90.5%) and voluntary reports (2.1%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.