Reported Reactions

Devices › Staple, implantable

Device brand name · Staple implantable

Proximate Pph Procedure Set: medical device reports filed with FDA

1,252 reports name it, 2004–2025. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Product code GDW.

1,252
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 56 a year
4
reports, 12 months to August 2026
41 in the 12 months before
74.7%
classified as malfunction
80.3% across the product code
0.2%
classified as death, as reported
2 reports · not verified by FDA

1,252 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Proximate Pph Procedure Set" (staple implantable); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Ethicon Endo-Surgery; received from April 2004 to December 2025. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

4 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 90% from 41 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (74.7%), injury (25%) and death (0.2%); across all staple, implantable reports (product code GDW) death is recorded in 0.6% and malfunction in 80.3%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are failure to form staple (51.4%), replace (16.1%) and failure to fire (13.2%). The patient problems coded most often are failure to anastomose, bleeding and hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

059Sep 2021: 3Oct 2021: 3Nov 2021: 5Dec 2021: 32022Jan 2022: 2Feb 2022: 1Mar 2022: 1Apr 2022: 4May 2022: 5Jun 2022: 6Jul 2022: 2Aug 2022: 4Sep 2022: 5Oct 2022: 5Nov 2022: 2Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 1Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 4Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 9Jul 2023: 4Aug 2023: 1Sep 2023: 3Oct 2023: 5Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 42024Jan 2024: 7Feb 2024: 3Mar 2024: 1Apr 2024: 3May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 3Jul 2024: 2Aug 2024: 1Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 1Nov 2024: 1Dec 2024: 62025Jan 2025: 4Feb 2025: 9Mar 2025: 4Apr 2025: 4May 2025: 2Jun 2025: 4Jul 2025: 4Aug 2025: 2Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 1Nov 2025: 2Dec 2025: 12026Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

0981962004: 320042005: 1182006: 4320062007: 1582008: 6020082009: 742010: 7720102011: 832012: 19620122013: 472015: 620152017: 62018: 5420182019: 1102020: 4020202021: 412022: 3720222023: 332024: 2920242025: 37

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0.2%2
Injury25%313
Malfunction74.7%935
Other0%0
Not given0.2%2

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report99.9%1,251
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0.1%1

Grey bar: all 170,752 reports carrying product code GDW. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Failure to form staple64451.4%20.5%
Replace20116.1%2.2%
Failure to fire16513.2%30%
Failure to cut13510.8%2.4%
Misfire604.8%9.1%
Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly544.3%2.3%
Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove493.9%1.7%
Firing problem393.1%1.6%
Positioning failure393.1%1.1%
Insufficient device problem information362.9%2.9%
Sticking272.2%1.2%
Device issuea problem with the device231.8%0.2%
Difficult to open or close201.6%9.7%
Patient device interaction problem171.4%0.7%
Mechanical problema mechanical problem161.3%1.1%
Mechanics altered131%1.4%
Breakthe device broke121%4.9%
Cut in material121%0%
Mechanical jam90.7%2.3%
Physical resistance90.7%0.2%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Failure to anastomose19415.5%
Bleeding17313.8%
Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding816.5%
Therapy/non-surgical treatment, additional806.4%
Blood loss745.9%
Surgical procedure, additional725.8%
Hospitalization required675.4%
Painpain, site not specified655.2%
Surgery, prolonged483.8%
Surgical procedure231.8%
Other (for use when an appropriate patient code cannot be identified)211.7%
Incontinence171.4%
Hematomaa collection of blood under the skin or in tissue151.2%
Surgical procedure, repeated151.2%
Transfusion of blood products151.2%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureProximate Pph Procedure SetProduct code GDWAll MAUDE reports
Reports1,252170,75226,136,888
Share of that pool—0.7%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports269
Classified as injury25%18.7%36.2%
Classified as malfunction74.7%80.3%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer99.9%97%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code GDW

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Endo GIA30,6192,0860.3%
Endo GIA Ultra17,2811,1160.1%
Signia9,4341,1300.1%
Tri-Staple 2.05,2676610.3%
Gia4,8994040.9%
Eea4,9225420.8%
Powered 60 Echelon + 340mm Shaft3,2372240.4%
Ets Flex Articng Lnr Cutr 45mm2,512790.3%
Unknown Endo GIA SULU2,4082051.9%
SureForm2,9276541.2%
Contour Curved Cutter Stapler1,961110.3%
Ils 29mm Curved1,945480.9%
Powered 60 Echelon + 440mm Shaft1,775490.4%
Echelon Flex Powered Vascular Stapler With Advanced Placement Tip1,7701801.6%
75mm Selectable New Tlc1,603571.1%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Proximate Pph Procedure Set reports

How many FDA reports name Proximate Pph Procedure Set?

1,252 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 4 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (74.7%), injury (25%) and death (0.2%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

failure to form staple (51.4%), replace (16.1%), failure to fire (13.2%), failure to cut (10.8%) and misfire (4.8%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (99.9%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Proximate Pph Procedure Set was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.