Reported Reactions

Devices › Detector and alarm, arrhythmia

Device brand name · Mx40 2 4 ghz smart hopping

Mx40 2 4 Ghz Smart Hopping: medical device reports filed with FDA

785 reports name it, 2013–2024. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Philips Medical Systems. Product code DSI.

785
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 60 a year
0
reports, 12 months to August 2026
1 in the 12 months before
97.6%
classified as malfunction
90.5% across the product code
1.5%
classified as death, as reported
12 reports · not verified by FDA

785 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Mx40 2 4 Ghz Smart Hopping" (mx40 2 4 ghz smart hopping); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Philips Medical Systems; received from May 2013 to December 2024. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

0 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, against 1 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (97.6%), death (1.5%) and injury (0.8%); across all detector and alarm, arrhythmia reports (product code DSI) death is recorded in 1.5% and malfunction in 90.5%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are no audible alarm (37.6%), no audible prompt/feedback (13%) and device operates differently than expected (9.8%). The patient problems coded most often are no patient involvement, death and loss of consciousness. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

0918Sep 2021: 4Oct 2021: 3Nov 2021: 2Dec 2021: 32022Jan 2022: 3Feb 2022: 3Mar 2022: 13Apr 2022: 8May 2022: 3Jun 2022: 1Jul 2022: 6Aug 2022: 18Sep 2022: 1Oct 2022: 2Nov 2022: 10Dec 2022: 32023Jan 2023: 2Feb 2023: 3Mar 2023: 1Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 2Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 1Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 0Jun 2024: 0Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 1Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 0Dec 2024: 12025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 0Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

0581162013: 520132014: 1022015: 3420152016: 982017: 11620172018: 992019: 9920192020: 902021: 6020212022: 712023: 820232024: 3

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death1.5%12
Injury0.8%6
Malfunction97.6%766
Other0%0
Not given0.1%1

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%785
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 33,398 reports carrying product code DSI. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
No audible alarm29537.6%11.1%
No audible prompt/feedback10213%4.5%
Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly779.8%2.9%
Device displays incorrect message587.4%1.5%
No device output587.4%1.3%
Device alarm system425.4%2.9%
Inaudible or unclear audible prompt/feedback425.4%0.7%
Mechanical problema mechanical problem222.8%0.3%
Defective devicethe device was defective212.7%0.4%
Defective component111.4%0.2%
Device inoperablethe device could not be used101.3%0.5%
Insufficient device problem information81%0.5%
Defective alarm70.9%0.7%
Display or visual feedback problem70.9%0.3%
Therapeutic or diagnostic output failure70.9%0.1%
Breakthe device broke60.8%0.2%
Component missing60.8%0.2%
Alarm not visible50.6%0.1%
Noise, audible50.6%0.1%
Output problem50.6%0.4%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
No patient involvement27835.4%
Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term60.8%
Loss of consciousnesspassing out30.4%
Arrhythmia10.1%
Bradycardiaslow heart rate10.1%
Cardiac arrestthe heart stopped10.1%
Cardiopulmonary arrest10.1%
Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness10.1%
Falla fall10.1%
Tachycardiafast heart rate10.1%
Thrombosis10.1%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureMx40 2 4 Ghz Smart HoppingProduct code DSIAll MAUDE reports
Reports78533,39826,136,888
Share of that pool—2.4%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports15159
Classified as injury0.8%7.8%36.2%
Classified as malfunction97.6%90.5%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%99.3%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code DSI

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Reveal LINQ19,1842640%
MX40 1.4 GHz Smart Hopping5,13561.3%
Reveal Xt2,03700.1%
Reveal Dx73000.4%
Acuity Central Monitoring71000%
Mp70 Intellivue Patient Monitor682015.4%
IntelliVue Multi Measurement Server X21,9241351.7%
Intellivue Mx40 802 11a/B/G32903%
Spacelabs Ultraview Sl Command Module20048.5%
IntelliVue MX800 patient monitor5025410.6%
Patient Connector207830%
IntelliVue MX40 2.4GHz192566.8%
Passport 2 Monitor46900.2%
IntelliVue MP52617310.7%
Zio AT711903.5%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Mx40 2 4 Ghz Smart Hopping reports

How many FDA reports name Mx40 2 4 Ghz Smart Hopping?

785 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 0 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (97.6%), death (1.5%) and injury (0.8%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

no audible alarm (37.6%), no audible prompt/feedback (13%), device operates differently than expected (9.8%), device displays incorrect message (7.4%) and no device output (7.4%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Mx40 2 4 Ghz Smart Hopping was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.