Reported Reactions

Devices › Staple, implantable

Device brand name · Staple implantable

Echelon Flex: medical device reports filed with FDA

1,084 reports name it, 2011–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Product code GDW.

1,084
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 70 a year
541
reports, 12 months to August 2026
28 in the 12 months before
93.2%
classified as malfunction
80.3% across the product code
0.9%
classified as death, as reported
10 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 1,084 reports that name the brand "Echelon Flex" (staple implantable), received between February 2011 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

541 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 1832% from 28 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (93.2%), injury (5.3%) and death (0.9%); across all staple, implantable reports (product code GDW) death is recorded in 0.6% and malfunction in 80.3%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are failure to fire (32.2%), difficult to open or close (19.9%) and failure to form staple (12.7%). The patient problems coded most often are hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding, failure to anastomose and tissue damage. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

064127Sep 2021: 3Oct 2021: 1Nov 2021: 1Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 3Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 3Apr 2022: 4May 2022: 3Jun 2022: 5Jul 2022: 1Aug 2022: 4Sep 2022: 2Oct 2022: 1Nov 2022: 3Dec 2022: 32023Jan 2023: 3Feb 2023: 1Mar 2023: 3Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 4Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 3Sep 2023: 2Oct 2023: 2Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 12024Jan 2024: 4Feb 2024: 2Mar 2024: 2Apr 2024: 4May 2024: 2Jun 2024: 1Jul 2024: 2Aug 2024: 2Sep 2024: 2Oct 2024: 2Nov 2024: 9Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 2Feb 2025: 1Mar 2025: 6Apr 2025: 2May 2025: 1Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 0Aug 2025: 3Sep 2025: 4Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 3Dec 2025: 22026Jan 2026: 7Feb 2026: 6Mar 2026: 38Apr 2026: 106May 2026: 58Jun 2026: 127Jul 2026: 66Aug 2026: 124

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

02665322011: 720112013: 112014: 2620142015: 262016: 3620162017: 1282018: 4620182019: 642020: 5620202021: 452022: 3220222023: 192024: 3220242025: 242026: 5322026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0.9%10
Injury5.3%57
Malfunction93.2%1,010
Other0.1%1
Not given0.6%6

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report56.7%615
Voluntary report0.3%3
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given43%466

Grey bar: all 170,752 reports carrying product code GDW. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Failure to fire34932.2%30%
Difficult to open or close21619.9%9.7%
Failure to form staple13812.7%20.5%
Mechanical jam989%2.3%
Failure to cut484.4%2.4%
Misfire423.9%9.1%
Material integrity problema problem with the device material302.8%0.7%
Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly272.5%2.3%
Activation failure262.4%0.4%
Insufficient device problem information242.2%2.9%
Firing problem222%1.6%
Device inoperablethe device could not be used171.6%0.5%
Mechanical problema mechanical problem151.4%1.1%
Noise, audible151.4%2.3%
Activation problem121.1%0.3%
Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove111%1.7%
Retraction problem100.9%1.2%
Patient device interaction problem90.8%0.7%
Physical resistance/sticking90.8%0.3%
Ejection problem80.7%0.8%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding888.1%
Failure to anastomose131.2%
Tissue damage131.2%
Blood loss90.8%
Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term70.6%
Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient40.4%
Not applicable40.4%
Laceration(s)30.3%
Cardiac arrestthe heart stopped20.2%
Hematomaa collection of blood under the skin or in tissue20.2%
Painpain, site not specified20.2%
Pneumothoraxa collapsed lung20.2%
Adhesion(s)10.1%
Adult respiratory distress syndrome10.1%
Bowel perforation10.1%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureEchelon FlexProduct code GDWAll MAUDE reports
Reports1,084170,75226,136,888
Share of that pool—0.6%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports969
Classified as injury5.3%18.7%36.2%
Classified as malfunction93.2%80.3%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer56.7%97%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code GDW

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Endo GIA30,6192,0860.3%
Endo GIA Ultra17,2811,1160.1%
Signia9,4341,1300.1%
Tri-Staple 2.05,2676610.3%
Gia4,8994040.9%
Eea4,9225420.8%
Powered 60 Echelon + 340mm Shaft3,2372240.4%
Ets Flex Articng Lnr Cutr 45mm2,512790.3%
Unknown Endo GIA SULU2,4082051.9%
SureForm2,9276541.2%
Contour Curved Cutter Stapler1,961110.3%
Ils 29mm Curved1,945480.9%
Powered 60 Echelon + 440mm Shaft1,775490.4%
Echelon Flex Powered Vascular Stapler With Advanced Placement Tip1,7701801.6%
75mm Selectable New Tlc1,603571.1%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Echelon Flex reports

How many FDA reports name Echelon Flex?

1,084 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 541 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (93.2%), injury (5.3%) and death (0.9%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

failure to fire (32.2%), difficult to open or close (19.9%), failure to form staple (12.7%), mechanical jam (9%) and failure to cut (4.4%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (56.7%) and voluntary reports (0.3%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Echelon Flex was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.