Reported Reactions

Devices › Hearing aid, bone conduction

Device brand name · Cochlear baha connect system

BI300 Implant 4 mm: medical device reports filed with FDA

314 reports name it, 2017–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions. Product code LXB.

314
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 33 a year
28
reports, 12 months to August 2026
22 in the 12 months before
0.6%
classified as malfunction
0.6% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 314 reports that name the brand "BI300 Implant 4 mm" (cochlear baha connect system), received between January 2017 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

28 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 27% from 22 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (99.4%) and malfunction (0.6%); across all hearing aid, bone conduction reports (product code LXB) death is recorded in 0% and malfunction in 0.6%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are loss of osseointegration (16.2%), patient device interaction problem (15.3%) and insufficient device problem information (3.2%). The patient problems coded most often are skin infection, pain and inadequate osseointegration. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

048Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 2Nov 2021: 2Dec 2021: 12022Jan 2022: 2Feb 2022: 2Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 2May 2022: 3Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 2Aug 2022: 2Sep 2022: 7Oct 2022: 2Nov 2022: 2Dec 2022: 22023Jan 2023: 6Feb 2023: 1Mar 2023: 8Apr 2023: 4May 2023: 1Jun 2023: 2Jul 2023: 3Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 3Oct 2023: 2Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 82024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 1Jul 2024: 5Aug 2024: 0Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 6Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 2Mar 2025: 2Apr 2025: 2May 2025: 1Jun 2025: 7Jul 2025: 2Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 2Oct 2025: 6Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 1Mar 2026: 4Apr 2026: 3May 2026: 2Jun 2026: 7Jul 2026: 2Aug 2026: 1

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

026522017: 3120172018: 3620182019: 5220192020: 3820202021: 3620212022: 2620222023: 3820232024: 1320242025: 2420252026: 202026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury99.4%312
Malfunction0.6%2
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report70.1%220
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report29.9%94
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 7,135 reports carrying product code LXB. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Loss of osseointegration5116.2%17%
Patient device interaction problem4815.3%8.7%
Insufficient device problem information103.2%3.7%
Expulsion41.3%1%
Failure to osseointegrate31%3.6%
Biocompatibility20.6%0.3%
Device dislodged or dislocated20.6%0.6%
Inadequacy of device shape and/or size20.6%0.4%
Loosening of implant not related to bone-ingrowth20.6%0.2%
Therapeutic or diagnostic output failure20.6%0.4%
Unexpected therapeutic results20.6%0.2%
Device issuea problem with the device10.3%0%
Migration or expulsion of device10.3%0.1%
Osseointegration problem10.3%0.1%
Patient-device incompatibilitythe device did not suit the patient10.3%0.4%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Skin infection319.9%
Painpain, site not specified299.2%
Inadequate osseointegration227%
Appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available206.4%
Bacterial infectiona bacterial infection134.1%
Hearing impairment92.9%
Discomfortdiscomfort82.5%
Impaired healingslow healing82.5%
Tissue breakdown82.5%
Skin inflammation/ irritation72.2%
Head injurya head injury61.9%
Headachehead pain51.6%
Host-tissue reaction51.6%
Purulent discharge51.6%
Foreign body reaction41.3%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureBI300 Implant 4 mmProduct code LXBAll MAUDE reports
Reports3147,13526,136,888
Share of that pool—4.4%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports009
Classified as injury99.4%98.3%36.2%
Classified as malfunction0.6%0.6%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer70.1%83.7%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code LXB

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Flange Fixture And Abutment2,92000%
BIM400 Implant Magnet1,1551530%
Asku4,7522101.1%
Baha Flange And Abutment18800%
Flange Fixture St 4mm W Baha Abutment19790%
Bi300 Implant 3mm181190%
BIA400 Implant 4mm w Abutment 12mm673350%
BIA400 Implant 4mm w Abutment 10mm833680%
BIA400 Implant 4mm w Abutment 8mm502330%
Ba400 Abutment 8mm31270%
BA400 Abutment 12mm321210%
BA400 Abutment 10mm419180%
BIA400 Implant 4mm w Abutment 14mm205250%
Nucleus 24 Channel Cochlear Implant System12,13700.1%
Cochlear Osia OSI200 Implant1,8242470.1%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about BI300 Implant 4 mm reports

How many FDA reports name BI300 Implant 4 mm?

314 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 28 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (99.4%) and malfunction (0.6%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

loss of osseointegration (16.2%), patient device interaction problem (15.3%), insufficient device problem information (3.2%), expulsion (1.3%) and failure to osseointegrate (1%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (70.1%) and distributor reports (29.9%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that BI300 Implant 4 mm was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.