Reported Reactions

Devices › Tissue expander and accessories

Device brand name · Expander skin inflatable

ARTOURA Breast Tissue Expander: medical device reports filed with FDA

314 reports name it, 2018–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Mentor Texas. Product code LCJ.

314
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 37 a year
8
reports, 12 months to August 2026
1 in the 12 months before
9.9%
classified as malfunction
15.5% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 314 reports that name the brand "ARTOURA Breast Tissue Expander" (expander skin inflatable), received between January 2018 and July 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Mentor Texas. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

8 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 700% from 1 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (90.1%) and malfunction (9.9%); across all tissue expander and accessories reports (product code LCJ) death is recorded in 0.1% and malfunction in 15.5%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are material rupture (77.7%), off-label use (4.5%) and device damaged prior to receipt by user (1.9%). The patient problems coded most often are deformity/ disfigurement, post operative wound infection and capsular contracture. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

023Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 2Nov 2021: 3Dec 2021: 12022Jan 2022: 2Feb 2022: 2Mar 2022: 2Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 2Jun 2022: 2Jul 2022: 2Aug 2022: 1Sep 2022: 1Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 1Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 2Mar 2023: 3Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 1Jun 2023: 1Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 2Sep 2023: 1Oct 2023: 1Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 12024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 1Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 0Jun 2024: 1Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 1Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 1Nov 2024: 0Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 0Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 1Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 1Jun 2026: 3Jul 2026: 3Aug 2026: 0

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

048962018: 6320182019: 7420192020: 9620202021: 4020212022: 1520222023: 1420232024: 420242026: 82026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury90.1%283
Malfunction9.9%31
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report99.4%312
Voluntary report0.3%1
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0.3%1

Grey bar: all 5,173 reports carrying product code LCJ. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Material rupture24477.7%35.3%
Off-label use144.5%2%
Device damaged prior to receipt by user61.9%0.1%
Material separation61.9%0.3%
Defective devicethe device was defective51.6%1%
Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed51.6%1%
Delivered as unsterile product41.3%0.1%
Connection problema connection problem31%0.6%
Inflation problem31%1.2%
Unsealed device packaging31%0.1%
Defective component20.6%0.3%
Deflation problem20.6%1.6%
Filling problem20.6%0.4%
Infusion or flow problema problem with flow or infusion20.6%0.4%
Insufficient device problem information20.6%1.2%
Packaging problem20.6%0.1%
Device contaminated during manufacture or shipping10.3%0.5%
Device contamination with chemical or other material10.3%0.9%
Expulsion10.3%0%
Fracturea broken bone10.3%0%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Deformity/ disfigurement5116.2%
Post operative wound infection103.2%
Capsular contracturescar tissue tightening around an implant61.9%
No patient involvement61.9%
Appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available41.3%
Painpain, site not specified41.3%
Seromaa collection of fluid under the skin41.3%
Local reaction31%
Necrosisdeath of tissue31%
Breast cancerbreast cancer20.6%
Cancer20.6%
Hematomaa collection of blood under the skin or in tissue20.6%
Wound dehiscencea wound reopened20.6%
Abscessa collection of pus10.3%
Breast discomfort/pain10.3%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureARTOURA Breast Tissue ExpanderProduct code LCJAll MAUDE reports
Reports3145,17326,136,888
Share of that pool—6.1%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports019
Classified as injury90.1%82.4%36.2%
Classified as malfunction9.9%15.5%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer99.4%89.1%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code LCJ

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Unk Tissue Expander481630%
MENTOR CPX 4 Breast Tissue Expander with Suture Tabs319370%
Unknown Tissue Expanders320240%
MENTOR Tissue Expander215150%
Mentor Cpx 4 Breast Tissue Expander18240%
Mcghan46800%
Mentor78800.1%
Motiva Implants2,5151,7290%
Breast Implant1,136971.3%
Non Mentor Product418220%
MENTOR MemoryGel Breast Implant57,7717,7080%
Unknown Gel Implants5,3377030%
Saline Breast Implant18601.1%
Unknown Mentor Implant424160%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about ARTOURA Breast Tissue Expander reports

How many FDA reports name ARTOURA Breast Tissue Expander?

314 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 8 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (90.1%) and malfunction (9.9%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

material rupture (77.7%), off-label use (4.5%), device damaged prior to receipt by user (1.9%), material separation (1.9%) and defective device (1.6%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (99.4%) and voluntary reports (0.3%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that ARTOURA Breast Tissue Expander was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.