Joint, temporomandibular, implant: medical device reports filed with FDA

3,116 reports carry this product code, 1992–2026; 5 brands with a page.

Read first · FDA's statement on these data

Adverse event reports submitted to FDA do not undergo extensive validation or verification. Therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report. While a suspected relationship may exist, it is not medically validated and should not be the sole source of information for clinical decision making or other assumptions about the safety or efficacy of a product. Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product. openFDA, FDA

FDA adds: "Although MDRs are a valuable source of information, this passive surveillance system has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data. In addition, the incidence or prevalence of an event cannot be determined from this reporting system alone due to potential under-reporting of events and lack of information about frequency of device use." And: "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices."

Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated.

Not medical advice. This site counts what was reported to FDA. Questions about a medicine or device belong with a pharmacist or clinician.

3,116
reports with this product code: 0% of all MAUDE reports; 259
reports, 12 months to August 2026: 169 in the 12 months before; 6.3%
classified as malfunction: 62.3% across all reports; 0.2%
classified as death, as reported: 0.9% across all reports

Product code LZD is FDA's classification for "Joint, temporomandibular, implant" (dental panel), a class 3 device. 3,116 medical device reports carry this product code, 0% of the MAUDE database, from April 1992 to August 2026.

259 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 53% from 169 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (89.3%), malfunction (6.3%) and other (2.2%). 5 brand names with a page on this site carry this code; the brands table is ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Brands with this product code

Brand	Reports	Latest 12 months	Classified as death	Classified as malfunction
TMJ Bilateral Implants	261	67	0%	18.4%
Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement System	209	0	0%	0%
Unknown Screw	5	156	0%	11.3%
Unknown_Fro_Product	4	7	0%	36.5%
Ni	2	1,587	1.8%	29.5%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Manufacturers named

Manufacturer (as written on reports)	Reports	Share
Biomet Microfixation	1,790	57.4%
Dow Corning	24	0.8%
Stryker Leibinger Freiburg	3	0.1%
Biomet	2	0.1%
Mcghan Medical	2	0.1%

Reports by month, five years

FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Event type and report source

Event type

Death0.2%7

Injury89.3%2,783

Malfunction6.3%196

Other2.2%69

Not given2%61

Who filed

Manufacturer report87.1%2,714

Voluntary report11.1%346

User facility report0%0

Distributor report0%0

Not given1.8%56

Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)	Reports	Share
Insufficient device problem information	434	13.9%
Explanted	195	6.3%
Device dislodged or dislocated	177	5.7%
Malposition of device	140	4.5%
Inadequacy of device shape and/or size	104	3.3%
Fracturea broken bone	101	3.2%
Patient-device incompatibilitythe device did not suit the patient	96	3.1%
Nonstandard device	82	2.6%
Migration or expulsion of device	75	2.4%
Patient device interaction problem	71	2.3%
Device appears to trigger rejection	63	2%
Noise, audible	51	1.6%
Replace	48	1.5%
Device remains implanted	47	1.5%
Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed	47	1.5%
Breakthe device broke	46	1.5%
Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly	44	1.4%
Reactiona reaction, type not specified	43	1.4%
Loosening of implant not related to bone-ingrowth	40	1.3%
Loose	37	1.2%

Questions about joint, temporomandibular, implant reports

What is product code LZD?

FDA's classification code for "Joint, temporomandibular, implant", class 3, reviewed by the dental panel. Every device report carries the product code of the device involved.

How many reports carry this code?

3,116 reports through August 2026, 259 of them in the latest 12 months.

Which brands appear most often?

TMJ Bilateral Implants (261), Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement System (209), Unknown Screw (5), Unknown_Fro_Product (4) and Ni (2). Widely used products collect more reports because more people use them.

Can the brands table be used to rank the devices?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." Brands differ in how many are in use, how long they have been sold and how reports are collected.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.