Reported Reactions

Manufacturers

Device manufacturer, as written on reports

Caldera Medical: medical device reports filed with FDA

1,077 reports name it as the manufacturer of the device involved, 2009–2026.

1,077
reports naming it as manufacturer
0% of all MAUDE reports
238
reports, 12 months to August 2026
29 in the 12 months before
7.1%
classified as malfunction
62.3% across all reports
0%
classified as death, as reported
0.9% across all reports

1,077 medical device reports received by FDA give Caldera Medical as the manufacturer of the device involved, 0% of the MAUDE database, from May 2009 to July 2026. Manufacturer names are as written on the report; subsidiaries and spelling variants may appear as separate names.

238 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 721% from 29 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (91%), malfunction (7.1%) and other (1.8%). Manufacturers are required to report events they learn of, so a large manufacturer with many products in use files many reports. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Brands named most often

BrandDevice typeReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
DesaraMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator29200%
Tvt Exact Retropubic SystemMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator55490%
T-SlingMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, female, mini-sling2800%
Tension Free Vaginal Tape - Exact Unknown ProductMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator28280%
Tension Free Vaginal Tape Unknown ProductMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator24240%
Gynecare Tvt ObturatorMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator17150%
Gynecare Tvt Obturator W LasrMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator14140%
Tension Free Vaginal Tape - Obturator Unknown ProdMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator550%
Gynecare Tvt-Abbrevo Mini LcmMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator440%
Gynecare TVTMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator230%

Brands with a page on this site, ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Device types

Product codeDevice typeReportsShare
FTLMesh, surgical, polymeric56052%
OTNMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator43240.1%
PAHMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, female, mini-sling444.1%
OTOMesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for apical vaginal and uterine prolapse, transabdominally placed191.8%
FTMMesh, surgical100.9%
HIHHysteroscope (and accessories)40.4%

Reports by month, five years

04793Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 0Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 1Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 9Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 2Aug 2022: 0Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 1Nov 2022: 8Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 12Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 5Jun 2023: 2Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 3Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 3Dec 2023: 52024Jan 2024: 1Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 1Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 0Jun 2024: 0Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 0Sep 2024: 1Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 1Dec 2024: 82025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 2Mar 2025: 1Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 8Aug 2025: 8Sep 2025: 9Oct 2025: 93Nov 2025: 43Dec 2025: 132026Jan 2026: 21Feb 2026: 18Mar 2026: 11Apr 2026: 17May 2026: 9Jun 2026: 3Jul 2026: 1Aug 2026: 0

FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Event type

Death0%0
Injury91%980
Malfunction7.1%77
Other1.8%19
Not given0.1%1

Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Questions about Caldera Medical reports

How many FDA device reports name Caldera Medical as manufacturer?

1,077 reports through August 2026, 238 of them in the latest 12 months.

Which of its brands appear most often?

Desara (292), Tvt Exact Retropubic System (55), T-Sling (28), Tension Free Vaginal Tape - Exact Unknown Product (28) and Tension Free Vaginal Tape Unknown Product (24).

Which device types does it report on?

mesh, surgical, polymeric (52%), mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, retropubic or transobturator (40.1%), mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for stress urinary incontinence, female, mini-sling (4.1%) and mesh, surgical, synthetic, urogynecologic, for apical vaginal and uterine prolapse, transabdominally placed (1.8%).

Does a high count say something about the manufacturer?

Not by itself. Manufacturers must file a report for every event they become aware of, so report volume follows the number of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. Manufacturer names are pooled after company suffixes (Inc., LLC, GmbH and similar) are dropped; names that read as a person rather than an organisation are never published. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.