Device manufacturer, as written on reports

Applied Medical: medical device reports filed with FDA

3,131 reports name it as the manufacturer of the device involved, 2001–2018.

Read first · FDA's statement on these data

Adverse event reports submitted to FDA do not undergo extensive validation or verification. Therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report. While a suspected relationship may exist, it is not medically validated and should not be the sole source of information for clinical decision making or other assumptions about the safety or efficacy of a product. Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product. openFDA, FDA

FDA adds: "Although MDRs are a valuable source of information, this passive surveillance system has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data. In addition, the incidence or prevalence of an event cannot be determined from this reporting system alone due to potential under-reporting of events and lack of information about frequency of device use." And: "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices."

Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated.

Not medical advice. This site counts what was reported to FDA. Questions about a medicine or device belong with a pharmacist or clinician.

3,131
reports naming it as manufacturer: 0% of all MAUDE reports; 0
reports, 12 months to August 2026: 0 in the 12 months before; 69.1%
classified as malfunction: 62.3% across all reports; 0.4%
classified as death, as reported: 0.9% across all reports

3,131 medical device reports received by FDA give Applied Medical as the manufacturer of the device involved, 0% of the MAUDE database, from March 2001 to October 2018. Manufacturer names are as written on the report; subsidiaries and spelling variants may appear as separate names.

0 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (69.1%), injury (10.8%) and other (2.8%). Manufacturers are required to report events they learn of, so a large manufacturer with many products in use files many reports. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Brands named most often

Brand	Device type	Reports	Latest 12 months	Classified as death
Ca090 Direct Drive Lca 3/Bx	Clip, implantable	566	0	0.2%
Epix Universal Clip Applier	Clip, implantable	335	232	0%
Direct Drive Disposable Clip Applier 10mm 3/Box	Clip, implantable	318	0	0%
Ca500 Epix Universal Clip Applier 3/Bx	Clip, implantable	190	0	0.1%
Eb010 Voyant 5mm Fusion 37cm 6/Bx	Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories	74	0	0%
Cd001 10mm Retrieval Sys 10bx	Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery	59	0	0%
Ctf73 12x100 Kii Fios Zthr 6/Bx	Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery	40	0	0.5%
C0r47 12x100 Kii Balloon Blunt Tip 6/Bx	Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery	17	0	0%
Cd003 5mm Retrieval System 10/Bx	Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery	17	0	0%
Cd004 12/15mm Retrieval System 5/Bx	Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery	12	0	0%
Cd001 10mm Retrieval System 10/Bx	Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery	8	0	0%
Inzii Retrieval System	Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery	8	102	0%
Cb030 5mmx35cm Epix Lapa Scissor 10/Bx	Laparoscope, gynecologic (and accessories)	4	0	0%
Kii Fios First Entry	Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery	4	70	0%

Brands with a page on this site, ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Device types

Product code	Device type	Reports	Share
FZP	Clip, implantable	1,396	44.6%
GCJ	Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery	1,184	37.8%
GEI	Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories	148	4.7%
GDO	Applier, surgical, clip	123	3.9%
DXE	Catheter, embolectomy	55	1.8%
NWV	Laparoscopic accessories, gynecologic	33	1.1%
HET	Laparoscope, gynecologic (and accessories)	32	1%
GAD	Retractor	16	0.5%
DXC	Clamp, vascular	15	0.5%
FAD	Stent, ureteral	15	0.5%

Reports by month, five years

FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Event type

Death0.4%11

Injury10.8%339

Malfunction69.1%2,163

Other2.8%89

Not given16.9%529

Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Questions about Applied Medical reports

How many FDA device reports name Applied Medical as manufacturer?

3,131 reports through August 2026, 0 of them in the latest 12 months.

Which of its brands appear most often?

Ca090 Direct Drive Lca 3/Bx (566), Epix Universal Clip Applier (335), Direct Drive Disposable Clip Applier 10mm 3/Box (318), Ca500 Epix Universal Clip Applier 3/Bx (190) and Eb010 Voyant 5mm Fusion 37cm 6/Bx (74).

Which device types does it report on?

clip, implantable (44.6%), laparoscope, general & plastic surgery (37.8%), electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation & accessories (4.7%) and applier, surgical, clip (3.9%).

Does a high count say something about the manufacturer?

Not by itself. Manufacturers must file a report for every event they become aware of, so report volume follows the number of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. Manufacturer names are pooled after company suffixes (Inc., LLC, GmbH and similar) are dropped; names that read as a person rather than an organisation are never published. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.