Device manufacturer, as written on reports

Apollo Endosurgery: medical device reports filed with FDA

2,678 reports name it as the manufacturer of the device involved, 2015–2026.

Read first · FDA's statement on these data

Adverse event reports submitted to FDA do not undergo extensive validation or verification. Therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report. While a suspected relationship may exist, it is not medically validated and should not be the sole source of information for clinical decision making or other assumptions about the safety or efficacy of a product. Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product. openFDA, FDA

FDA adds: "Although MDRs are a valuable source of information, this passive surveillance system has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data. In addition, the incidence or prevalence of an event cannot be determined from this reporting system alone due to potential under-reporting of events and lack of information about frequency of device use." And: "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices."

Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated.

Not medical advice. This site counts what was reported to FDA. Questions about a medicine or device belong with a pharmacist or clinician.

2,678
reports naming it as manufacturer: 0% of all MAUDE reports; 172
reports, 12 months to August 2026: 189 in the 12 months before; 60.4%
classified as malfunction: 62.3% across all reports; 1.5%
classified as death, as reported: 0.9% across all reports

2,678 medical device reports received by FDA give Apollo Endosurgery as the manufacturer of the device involved, 0% of the MAUDE database, from March 2015 to August 2026. Manufacturer names are as written on the report; subsidiaries and spelling variants may appear as separate names.

172 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, close to the 189 of the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (60.4%), injury (38.1%) and death (1.5%). Manufacturers are required to report events they learn of, so a large manufacturer with many products in use files many reports. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Brands named most often

Brand	Device type	Reports	Latest 12 months	Classified as death
Orbera Intragastric Balloon System	Implant, intragastric for morbid obesity	823	10	2.5%
Lap-Band System	Implant, intragastric for morbid obesity	346	0	2%
ORBERA365 Intragastric Balloon System	Implant, intragastric for morbid obesity	346	29	0.3%
OverStitch Suture Cinch	Endoscopic tissue approximation device	46	142	0%
Orbera Intragastric Balloon	Implant, intragastric for morbid obesity	29	0	1.3%
Lap-Band Adjustable Gastric Banding System	Implant, intragastric for morbid obesity	3	0	2%
Lap-Band Adjustable Gastric Banding System 10 0cm	Implant, intragastric for morbid obesity	1	0	0.4%
Lap-Band Ap Adjustable Gastric Banding System Standard	Implant, intragastric for morbid obesity	1	0	0.4%

Brands with a page on this site, ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Device types

Product code	Device type	Reports	Share
LTI	Implant, intragastric for morbid obesity	2,226	83.1%
OCW	Endoscopic tissue approximation device	399	14.9%
PKL	Hemostatic metal clip for the gi tract	31	1.2%
FED	Endoscopic access overtube, gastroenterology-urology	10	0.4%
HCF	Instrument, ligature passing and knot tying	10	0.4%
OCZ	Endoscopic grasping/cutting instrument, non-powered	1	0%

Reports by month, five years

FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Event type

Death1.5%39

Injury38.1%1,021

Malfunction60.4%1,617

Other0%0

Not given0%1

Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Questions about Apollo Endosurgery reports

How many FDA device reports name Apollo Endosurgery as manufacturer?

2,678 reports through August 2026, 172 of them in the latest 12 months.

Which of its brands appear most often?

Orbera Intragastric Balloon System (823), Lap-Band System (346), ORBERA365 Intragastric Balloon System (346), OverStitch Suture Cinch (46) and Orbera Intragastric Balloon (29).

Which device types does it report on?

implant, intragastric for morbid obesity (83.1%), endoscopic tissue approximation device (14.9%), hemostatic metal clip for the gi tract (1.2%) and endoscopic access overtube, gastroenterology-urology (0.4%).

Does a high count say something about the manufacturer?

Not by itself. Manufacturers must file a report for every event they become aware of, so report volume follows the number of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. Manufacturer names are pooled after company suffixes (Inc., LLC, GmbH and similar) are dropped; names that read as a person rather than an organisation are never published. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.