Reported Reactions

Drugs

Brand name · Varicella virus vaccine live

Varivax: adverse event reports filed with FDA

1,060 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2007–2026.

1,060
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 57 a year
216
reports, 12 months to June 2026
88 in the 12 months before
13.9%
marked serious by the reporter
57.4% across all reports
3%
record death among outcomes, as reported
32 reports · not verified by FDA

1,060 adverse event reports received by FDA list the brand name Varivax (varicella virus vaccine live) as a suspect or interacting product, from October 2007 to June 2026. A further 99 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 216 reports listed it, up 145% from 88 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 57 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

The reactions recorded most often are no adverse event (68.6%), product storage error (34.1%) and expired product administered (7.5%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 151 different terms appear across these reports. No adverse event is recorded in 68.6% of these reports, against 0.8% of all reports in the database.

13.9% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter; 3% record death among the outcomes and 7.9% record hospitalisation, as reported. 57.6% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is under 2 (17.4%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

01529Jul 2021: 2Aug 2021: 1Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 2Nov 2021: 2Dec 2021: 22022Jan 2022: 2Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 1Apr 2022: 2May 2022: 4Jun 2022: 11Jul 2022: 8Aug 2022: 7Sep 2022: 7Oct 2022: 4Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 22023Jan 2023: 6Feb 2023: 10Mar 2023: 4Apr 2023: 2May 2023: 3Jun 2023: 2Jul 2023: 3Aug 2023: 2Sep 2023: 1Oct 2023: 3Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 32024Jan 2024: 3Feb 2024: 4Mar 2024: 4Apr 2024: 1May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 2Jul 2024: 2Aug 2024: 1Sep 2024: 3Oct 2024: 1Nov 2024: 2Dec 2024: 42025Jan 2025: 3Feb 2025: 7Mar 2025: 19Apr 2025: 11May 2025: 24Jun 2025: 11Jul 2025: 20Aug 2025: 19Sep 2025: 28Oct 2025: 13Nov 2025: 12Dec 2025: 102026Jan 2026: 18Feb 2026: 26Mar 2026: 29Apr 2026: 27May 2026: 5Jun 2026: 9

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

01042072007: 220072012: 22013: 220132014: 42015: 1320152016: 42017: 20720172018: 1322019: 18420192020: 792021: 2420212022: 482023: 4020232024: 282025: 17720252026: 114

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Varivax reports recording the termall reports in the database

  1. No adverse eventno adverse event was reported68.6%727
  2. Product storage errorthe product was stored wrongly34.1%361
  3. Expired product administeredthe product was used past its expiry date7.5%80
  4. Inappropriate schedule of product administrationthe product was taken at the wrong times4%42
  5. Pyrexiafever3.5%37
  6. Exposure during pregnancythe medicine was taken during pregnancy3.4%36
  7. Overdosea dose above the recommended amount3.1%33
  8. Incorrect route of product administrationthe product was given by the wrong route2.9%31
  9. Incorrect product storagethe product was stored wrongly2.7%29
  10. Accidental overdosean accidental overdose2.6%28
  11. Wrong drug administeredthe wrong medicine was given2.5%26
  12. Inappropriate schedule of drug administrationthe medicine was taken at the wrong times2.1%22
  13. Product storage issue2.1%22
  14. Rashskin rash1.9%20
  15. Painpain, site not specified1.7%18
  16. Antibody test negative1.6%17
  17. Product preparation issuea problem preparing the product1.6%17
  18. Rash vesicular1.5%16
  19. Incorrect route of drug administrationthe medicine was given by the wrong route1.4%15
  20. Dry skindry skin1.3%14
  21. Varicella1.3%14
  22. Pneumonialung infection1.2%13
  23. Flatulencewind1.1%12
  24. Immobile1.1%12
  25. Respiratory failurethe lungs could not supply enough oxygen1.1%12
  26. Pain in extremitypain in an arm or leg1%11

Top 30 of 151 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the share of all reports in the database; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death3%32
Life-threatening0.8%8
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)7.9%84
Disability0.4%4
Congenital anomaly0.1%1
Other serious9.5%101
Not serious86.1%913

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 20,646,523 reports. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 217.4%184
2 to 1112.5%132
12 to 173%32
18 to 449.1%96
45 to 642.4%25
65 to 740.8%8
75 and over0.4%4
Age not given54.6%579

Patient sex

Female26.7%283
Male16.9%179
Not given56.4%598

Who reported

Physician18.3%194
Pharmacist7.7%82
Other health professional57.6%611
Lawyer0.8%8
Consumer or non-health professional15.6%165
Not given0%0

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 90.8% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Prophylaxis90285.1%
Immunisation373.5%
Varicella immunisation100.9%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 1,060 reports.

In context

MeasureVarivaxAll reports
Reports as suspect product1,06020,646,523
Share of that pool—0%
Reports, latest 12 months2161,332,454
Marked serious13.9%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports3091
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports79213
Consumer-filed share15.6%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsNo adverse event 68.6%0.8%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Questions about Varivax reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Varivax?

1,060 reports list Varivax as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 216 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 99 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Varivax reports?

no adverse event (68.6%), product storage error (34.1%), expired product administered (7.5%), inappropriate schedule of product administration (4%) and pyrexia (3.5%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Varivax was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

13.9% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 3% of reports include death and 7.9% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

other health professional (57.6%), physician (18.3%) and consumer or non-health professional (15.6%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Varivax rising?

216 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, up 145% from 88 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Varivax was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Varivax?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Varivax as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (99) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.