Reported Reactions

Drugs

Brand name · Teplizumab-mzwv

Tzield: adverse event reports filed with FDA

516 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2023–2026.

516
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 155 a year
192
reports, 12 months to June 2026
161 in the 12 months before
10.9%
marked serious by the reporter
57.4% across all reports
0%
record death among outcomes, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

Between March 2023 and June 2026, 516 adverse event reports received by FDA list the brand name Tzield (teplizumab-mzwv) as a suspect or interacting product. Reports that mention it only as a concomitant medication (1) are left out of every figure here.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 192 reports listed it, up 19% from 161 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 155 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

Reporters most often recorded rash (23.8%), nausea (21.5%) and fatigue (17.2%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 115 different terms appear across these reports. Rash is recorded in 23.8% of these reports, against 2.1% of all reports in the database.

10.9% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter; 0% record death among the outcomes and 3.1% record hospitalisation, as reported. 43.4% of the reports came from physicians, and the largest patient age group is 18 to 44 (38.6%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

01530Jul 2021: 0Aug 2021: 0Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 0Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 0Aug 2022: 0Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 5Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 25Jul 2023: 1Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 21Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 262024Jan 2024: 3Feb 2024: 10Mar 2024: 21Apr 2024: 25May 2024: 17Jun 2024: 9Jul 2024: 10Aug 2024: 9Sep 2024: 11Oct 2024: 13Nov 2024: 28Dec 2024: 82025Jan 2025: 10Feb 2025: 5Mar 2025: 15Apr 2025: 11May 2025: 16Jun 2025: 25Jul 2025: 15Aug 2025: 16Sep 2025: 30Oct 2025: 14Nov 2025: 21Dec 2025: 122026Jan 2026: 14Feb 2026: 14Mar 2026: 4Apr 2026: 16May 2026: 19Jun 2026: 17

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

0951902023: 7820232024: 16420242025: 19020252026: 842026

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Tzield reports recording the termall reports in the database

  1. Rashskin rash23.8%123
  2. Nauseafeeling sick21.5%111
  3. Fatiguetiredness17.2%89
  4. Pyrexiafever14.7%76
  5. Headachehead pain14.3%74
  6. Vomitingbeing sick12%62
  7. Rash pruritican itchy rash7.2%37
  8. Chillschills or shivering7%36
  9. Painpain, site not specified6.4%33
  10. Pruritusitching5.6%29
  11. White blood cell count decreasedlow white cell count4.8%25
  12. Diarrhoealoose or frequent stools4.7%24
  13. Alanine aminotransferase increasedraised liver enzyme (ALT)3.9%20
  14. Aspartate aminotransferase increasedraised liver enzyme (AST)3.5%18
  15. Rash erythematousa red rash3.1%16
  16. Blood glucose increasedraised blood sugar reading2.9%15
  17. Influenza like illnessflu-like symptoms2.9%15
  18. Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness2.7%14
  19. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label2.7%14
  20. Decreased appetitereduced appetite2.5%13
  21. Hypotensionlow blood pressure2.5%13
  22. Myalgiamuscle pain2.5%13
  23. Condition aggravatedthe condition being treated got worse2.3%12
  24. Urticariahives2.3%12
  25. Arthralgiajoint pain2.1%11
  26. Body temperature increasedraised temperature2.1%11

Top 30 of 115 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the share of all reports in the database; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death0%0
Life-threatening0.6%3
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)3.1%16
Disability0.2%1
Congenital anomaly0%0
Other serious8.7%45
Not serious89.1%460

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 20,646,523 reports. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20%0
2 to 118.9%46
12 to 1712.2%63
18 to 4438.6%199
45 to 6411.6%60
65 to 741.4%7
75 and over0.2%1
Age not given27.1%140

Patient sex

Female49.4%255
Male34.3%177
Not given16.3%84

Who reported

Physician43.4%224
Pharmacist4.3%22
Other health professional16.3%84
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional35.7%184
Not given0.4%2

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 99.8% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Diabetes prophylaxis23044.6%
Type 1 diabetes mellitus5510.7%
Presymptomatic type 1 diabetes mellitus112.1%
Diabetes mellitus91.7%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 516 reports.

In context

MeasureTzieldAll reports
Reports as suspect product51620,646,523
Share of that pool—0%
Reports, latest 12 months1921,332,454
Marked serious10.9%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports091
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports31213
Consumer-filed share35.7%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsRash 23.8%2.1%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Questions about Tzield reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Tzield?

516 reports list Tzield as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 192 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 1 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Tzield reports?

rash (23.8%), nausea (21.5%), fatigue (17.2%), pyrexia (14.7%) and headache (14.3%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Tzield was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

10.9% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 0% of reports include death and 3.1% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

physician (43.4%), consumer or non-health professional (35.7%) and other health professional (16.3%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Tzield rising?

192 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, up 19% from 161 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Tzield was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Tzield?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Tzield as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (1) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.