Drugs › Non-Standardized food allergenic extract
Brand name · Capsicum annuum, cetraria islandica, fucus vesiculosus, glandula suprarenalis suis, thyroidinum (suis), cadmium iodatum, hydrangea arborescens, phosphoricum acidum, phosphorus, pulsatilla (pratensis), strontium carbonicum, uranium nitricum, x-ray
Radiation: adverse event reports filed with FDA
610 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2004–2021. Class: Non-Standardized food allergenic extract.
- 610
- reports as suspect product
- 0% of all reports · about 27 a year
- 0
- reports, 12 months to June 2026
- 0 in the 12 months before
- 90%
- marked serious by the reporter
- 70.4% across the class
- 15.4%
- record death among outcomes, as reported
- 94 reports · not verified by FDA
610 adverse event reports received by FDA list the brand name Radiation (capsicum annuum, cetraria islandica, fucus vesiculosus, glandula suprarenalis suis, thyroidinum (suis), cadmium iodatum, hydrangea arborescens, phosphoricum acidum, phosphorus, pulsatilla (pratensis), strontium carbonicum, uranium nitricum, x-ray) as a suspect or interacting product, from January 2004 to April 2021. A further 454 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.
In the 12 months to June 2026, 0 reports listed it, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 27 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 26.2% of the reports for the non-Standardized food allergenic extract class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.
The MedDRA terms listed most often are nausea (14.1%), vomiting (12.6%) and dehydration (11.1%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 292 different terms appear across these reports. Nausea is recorded in 14.1% of these reports, about the same share as in the median non-Standardized food allergenic extract drug (12.5%).
90% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (70.4% across the class); 15.4% record death among the outcomes and 60.8% record hospitalisation, as reported. 35.6% of the reports came from physicians, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (19.8%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."
Reports by month, five years
No report listing Radiation was received in the five years to June 2026; the latest was received in April 2021.
By year received
Reactions recorded in the reports
share of Radiation reports recording the termmedian drug in non-standardized food allergenic extract
- Nauseafeeling sick14.1%86
- Vomitingbeing sick12.6%77
- Dehydrationdehydration11.1%68
- Diarrhoealoose or frequent stools7.7%47
- Dyspnoeashortness of breath7.5%46
- Pyrexiafever7.4%45
- Dysphagiadifficulty swallowing6.9%42
- Fatiguetiredness6.1%37
- Astheniaweakness or lack of energy5.6%34
- Febrile neutropeniafever with low white blood cells4.6%28
- Neutropenialow neutrophils, a type of white blood cell4.6%28
- Pneumonialung infection4.6%28
- Haemoglobin decreasedlow haemoglobin4.1%25
- Hypotensionlow blood pressure4.1%25
- Oesophagitis3.9%24
- Weight decreasedweight loss3.9%24
- White blood cell count decreasedlow white cell count3.9%24
- Painpain, site not specified3.8%23
- Abdominal painstomach or belly pain3.6%22
- Anaemialow red blood cells3.6%22
- Confusional stateconfusion3.4%21
- Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness3.3%20
- Malaisegeneral feeling of being unwell3.3%20
- Pulmonary embolisma blood clot in the lung3.3%20
- Headachehead pain2.8%17
- Oral intake reduced2.8%17
- Platelet count decreasedlow platelet count2.8%17
- Pleural effusionfluid around the lung2.8%17
- Mucosal inflammation2.6%16
- Sepsisa severe body-wide response to infection2.6%16
Top 30 of 292 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 3 drugs in the non-standardized food allergenic extract class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."
Outcomes recorded
Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 2,328 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."
Patients and reporters
Patient age
Patient sex
Who reported
Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 60% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.
Reason for use recorded
| Indication as recorded (MedDRA) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Non-small cell lung cancer | 46 | 7.5% |
| Non-small cell lung cancer stage iii | 35 | 5.7% |
| Pancreatic carcinoma | 15 | 2.5% |
| Neoplasm malignant | 14 | 2.3% |
| T-cell type acute leukaemia | 8 | 1.3% |
| Head and neck cancer | 6 | 1% |
The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 610 reports.
In context
| Measure | Radiation | Non-Standardized food allergenic extract | All reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports as suspect product | 610 | 2,328 | 20,646,523 |
| Share of that pool | — | 26.2% | 0% |
| Reports, latest 12 months | 0 | — | 1,332,454 |
| Marked serious | 90% | 70.4% | 57.4% |
| Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports | 154 | 263 | 91 |
| Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports | 608 | 249 | 213 |
| Consumer-filed share | 9.8% | 32.9% | 45.8% |
| Top term, share of reports | Nausea 14.1% | median 12.5% | 3.8% |
Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."
Other drugs in the non-standardized food allergenic extract class
| Drug | Name type | Reports | Latest 12 months | Marked serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salicylic acid | generic | 874 | 150 | 89.7% |
| Zicam | brand | 844 | 6 | 36.3% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.
Questions about Radiation reports
How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Radiation?
610 reports list Radiation as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 0 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 454 list it only as a concomitant medication.
What reactions are recorded in Radiation reports?
nausea (14.1%), vomiting (12.6%), dehydration (11.1%), diarrhoea (7.7%) and dyspnoea (7.5%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Radiation was responsible.
How serious are the reports?
90% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 15.4% of reports include death and 60.8% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.
Who files these reports?
physician (35.6%), not given (34.4%) and other health professional (19.5%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.
Are reports for Radiation rising?
0 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.
Do these reports show that Radiation was responsible for these reactions?
No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.
Is this a list of the side effects of Radiation?
No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.
How do I report an adverse event?
Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Radiation as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (454) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.