Reported Reactions

Drugs

Brand name · Donanemab-azbt

Kisunla: adverse event reports filed with FDA

2,525 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2024–2026.

2,525
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 1,321 a year
1,878
reports, 12 months to June 2026
647 in the 12 months before
45.5%
marked serious by the reporter
57.4% across all reports
2.1%
record death among outcomes, as reported
54 reports · not verified by FDA

2,525 adverse event reports received by FDA list the brand name Kisunla (donanemab-azbt) as a suspect or interacting product, from August 2024 to June 2026. A further 4 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 1,878 reports listed it, up 190% from 647 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 1,321 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

Reporters most often recorded amyloid related imaging abnormality-oedema/effusion (16.6%), amyloid related imaging abnormality-microhaemorrhages and haemosiderin deposits (13.5%) and infusion related reaction (12.5%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 269 different terms appear across these reports. Amyloid related imaging abnormality-oedema/effusion is recorded in 16.6% of these reports, against 0% of all reports in the database.

45.5% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter; 2.1% record death among the outcomes and 11.8% record hospitalisation, as reported. 67.6% of the reports came from consumers, and the largest patient age group is 75 and over (27.9%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

0106211Jul 2021: 0Aug 2021: 0Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 0Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 0Aug 2022: 0Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 0Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 0Jun 2024: 0Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 3Sep 2024: 3Oct 2024: 14Nov 2024: 24Dec 2024: 302025Jan 2025: 44Feb 2025: 77Mar 2025: 98Apr 2025: 118May 2025: 124Jun 2025: 112Jul 2025: 111Aug 2025: 108Sep 2025: 159Oct 2025: 175Nov 2025: 108Dec 2025: 2112026Jan 2026: 137Feb 2026: 174Mar 2026: 180Apr 2026: 128May 2026: 181Jun 2026: 206

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

07231,4452024: 7420242025: 1,44520252026: 1,0062026

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Kisunla reports recording the termall reports in the database

  1. Amyloid related imaging abnormality-oedema/effusion16.6%418
  2. Amyloid related imaging abnormality-microhaemorrhages and haemosiderin deposits13.5%340
  3. Infusion related reactiona reaction during or soon after an infusion12.5%315
  4. Headachehead pain9.1%231
  5. Flushingsudden reddening or warmth of the skin6.7%169
  6. Amyloid related imaging abnormalities5.9%148
  7. Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness4.2%106
  8. Nauseafeeling sick4.2%106
  9. Dyspnoeashortness of breath3.6%91
  10. Cerebral microhaemorrhage3.2%82
  11. Chillschills or shivering3.2%82
  12. Confusional stateconfusion3.2%81
  13. Blood pressure increaseda raised blood pressure reading2.7%68
  14. Back painback pain2.6%66
  15. Falla fall2.5%62
  16. Erythemaskin redness2.3%58
  17. Chest discomfortchest discomfort2.2%56
  18. Fatiguetiredness2.2%55
  19. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label2.1%54
  20. Anaphylactic reactiona severe, sudden allergic reaction1.7%44
  21. Tremorshaking1.7%44
  22. Seizurea fit or convulsion1.7%43
  23. Hypotensionlow blood pressure1.5%39
  24. Feeling hotfeeling hot1.5%38
  25. Vomitingbeing sick1.5%38
  26. Chest painchest pain1.4%36
  27. Blood pressure decreaseda low blood pressure reading1.4%35

Top 30 of 269 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the share of all reports in the database; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death2.1%54
Life-threatening1.7%43
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)11.8%299
Disability0.2%6
Congenital anomaly0%0
Other serious33.9%857
Not serious54.5%1,375

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 20,646,523 reports. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20%0
2 to 110%0
12 to 170%0
18 to 440%0
45 to 644.1%103
65 to 7417.1%432
75 and over27.9%705
Age not given50.9%1,285

Patient sex

Female47.6%1,203
Male29.6%748
Not given22.7%574

Who reported

Physician8.4%212
Pharmacist1%26
Other health professional22.6%571
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional67.6%1,707
Not given0.4%9

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 90.9% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Dementia alzheimer's type93136.9%
Cognitive disorder2439.6%
Dementia331.3%
Amyloid related imaging abnormalities30.1%
Infusion related reaction30.1%
Amnesia20.1%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 2,525 reports.

In context

MeasureKisunlaAll reports
Reports as suspect product2,52520,646,523
Share of that pool—0%
Reports, latest 12 months1,8781,332,454
Marked serious45.5%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports2191
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports118213
Consumer-filed share67.6%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsAmyloid related imaging abnormality-oedema/effusion 16.6%0%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Questions about Kisunla reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Kisunla?

2,525 reports list Kisunla as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 1,878 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 4 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Kisunla reports?

amyloid related imaging abnormality-oedema/effusion (16.6%), amyloid related imaging abnormality-microhaemorrhages and haemosiderin deposits (13.5%), infusion related reaction (12.5%), headache (9.1%) and flushing (6.7%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Kisunla was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

45.5% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 2.1% of reports include death and 11.8% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

consumer or non-health professional (67.6%), other health professional (22.6%) and physician (8.4%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Kisunla rising?

1,878 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, up 190% from 647 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Kisunla was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Kisunla?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Kisunla as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (4) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.