Reported Reactions

Adverse event reports that FDA received

  • Search
  • Watch list

Gliadel (carmustine) adverse event reports that FDA received

Name type
Brand name
Generic name
Carmustine
Class
Alkylating drug

What a report is

A report is not proof that the drug was the cause of the event.

FDA says:

Adverse event reports submitted to FDA do not undergo extensive validation or verification. Therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report. While a suspected relationship may exist, it is not medically validated and should not be the sole source of information for clinical decision making or other assumptions about the safety or efficacy of a product. Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product.

Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview, section "Responsible use of the data". The site read the page on . The data have the reports that FDA received through .

FDA also says:

There is no certainty that the reported event (adverse event or medication error) was actually due to the product. FDA does not require that a causal relationship between a product and event be proven, and reports do not always contain enough detail to properly evaluate an event. The information in these reports has not been scientifically or otherwise verified as to a cause and effect relationship and cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events.

Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .

Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated.

Source: openFDA, Response of the drug event API (meta.disclaimer). The site read the page on .

Not medical advice. This site counts what was reported to FDA. Questions about a medicine or device belong with a pharmacist or clinician.

Reports on file

From July 2004 to April 2026, FDA received 523 adverse event reports that name Gliadel. In these reports the drug is a suspect or interacting product.

In the same period, 31 further reports name it only as a concomitant medicine. The counts on this page do not include these reports.

FDA received 2 reports in the 12 months to June 2026 and 1 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data every quarter, so the newest months are not complete. They grow in later releases.

The number of people who use the product is not in the data. A count is not a rate. A count of reports is not a count of events or of patients, because one event can have more than one report.

There are many instances of duplicative reports and some reports do not contain all the necessary information.

Source: FDA, FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) Public Dashboard. Content current as of . The site read the page on .

Suspect product

FDA records each drug in a report as suspect, concomitant or interacting. This page counts the reports in which Gliadel is suspect or interacting. FDA says:

Any number of the drugs may be marked as suspect if thought to be responsible for one or more of the reactions, but that information is not validated.

Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .

Data version

openFDA FAERS release of 1 Oct 2026. Reports received through 30 Jun 2026.

Since the last update

FDA says:

Many factors can influence whether or not an event will be reported, such as the time a product has been marketed and publicity about an event.

Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .

The information in these reports cannot be used to estimate the incidence (occurrence rates) of the events reported.

Source: FDA, FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) Public Dashboard. Content current as of . The site read the page on .

No update is on record for this page. The record starts when FDA adds the reports of July to September 2026.

  • In April to June 2026, FDA received 1 report that names Gliadel.
  • In January to March 2026, FDA received 1.
  • In April to June 2025, FDA received 0.

April to June 2026 is the latest closed quarter in the data. A closed quarter is a quarter for which the FDA files have most of the reports.

All updatesFeed of updates (RSS)

Reaction lookup

These are the reaction terms that the reports record, with the number of reports for each term. Type a term or a plain word to find its count.

What this list leaves out

The table lists the 58 reaction terms that 5 or more reports record. A term with fewer than 5 reports is not in the table.

The site keeps reaction terms for 479 of the 523 reports (91.6%).

The reports of the other years are not in the counts.

So a count in the table can be lower than the count of FDA.

The table shows the first 50 of 58 terms.

Reaction terms in the reports that name Gliadel, most reports first
Reaction term (MedDRA) and plain meaningReportsShare of the 523 reports
Brain oedema11822.6%
Convulsion417.8%
Hemiplegia356.7%
Post procedural complicationa complication after a procedure346.5%
Pneumocephalus336.3%
Deep vein thrombosisa blood clot in a deep vein295.5%
Headachehead pain285.4%
Pyrexiafever275.2%
Condition aggravatedthe condition being treated got worse234.4%
Cerebral infarction214%
Intracranial hypotension214%
Pulmonary embolisma blood clot in the lung214%
Aphasiadifficulty with language203.8%
Disease progressionthe disease advanced193.6%
Brain abscess183.4%
Cerebrospinal fluid leakage152.9%
Hydrocephalus152.9%
Staphylococcal infection142.7%
Thrombocytopenialow platelets142.7%
Hemiparesis132.5%
Mental status changes132.5%
Infectionan infection, type not specified122.3%
Intracranial pressure increased122.3%
Paralysis122.3%
Altered state of consciousness112.1%
Somnolencedrowsiness112.1%
Cerebral haemorrhage101.9%
Fatiguetiredness101.9%
Impaired healingslow healing101.9%
Incision site infection101.9%
Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label91.7%
Falla fall81.5%
Meningitis81.5%
Postoperative wound infection81.5%
Cognitive disorderproblems with thinking or memory71.3%
Drug administration errora mistake in giving the medicine71.3%
Gait disturbancedifficulty walking71.3%
Incision site complication71.3%
Lethargysluggishness71.3%
Astheniaweakness or lack of energy61.1%
Coma61.1%
Confusional stateconfusion61.1%
Hyponatraemialow blood sodium61.1%
Malignant neoplasm progression61.1%
Procedural site reaction61.1%
Vomitingbeing sick61.1%
Wound infectionan infected wound61.1%
Wound infection staphylococcal61.1%
Brain herniation51%
Depressionlow mood51%

Download all 58 terms of Gliadel (CSV)

The counts add to more than 523 reports, because one report can record more than one term. FDA says:

No individual drug is connected to any individual reaction. When a report lists multiple drugs and multiple reactions, there is no way to conclude from the data therein that a given drug is responsible for a given reaction.

Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .

The CSV file has the same rows and the same limits. Its last row is a note that says so.

MedDRA term

The person who codes a report selects the preferred term that agrees best with the description of the reporter. The words under a term are the plain meaning that this site gives.

Not the label

The FDA-approved label of a product lists its adverse reactions. See the official pages at the end of this page.

Same ingredient, other names

Reporters write a brand name or a generic name. Each name has its own page and its own count.

Names of Carmustine with a page, in the order generic names, brand names, names as reported
NameName typeReports
CarmustineGeneric name3,378
Gliadel (this page)Brand name523

Sum of the separately reported names: 3,901. A report that names two of these names is in the sum two times. The sum is not the number of reports for the ingredient.

FDA says:

Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product.

Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .

Importantly, the AEMS data by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic.

Source: FDA, FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) Public Dashboard. Content current as of . The site read the page on .

Outcomes by year

The table gives the outcomes that the reporters gave, in the terms of FDA.

Outcomes in the reports that name Gliadel, by the year of the openFDA file that holds the report

The table continues to the right.

Year of the openFDA fileReportsSeriousDeathLife-threateningHospitalization (initial or prolonged)Disability or Permanent DamageCongenital Anomaly/Birth DefectOther Serious (Important Medical Events)Not serious
20041393060004
2005554957360076
200677761735810161
20073635932220161
200826241031300102
200911113071000
2010212082101071
201114143392030
2012161651130030
20132929351320150
20145454852730310
20156060682140400
2016171704111060
20172927511030122
2018191602110053
201913130181050
2020871150041
2022760030031
202311105080031
2024542030021
2026220010010

An outcome in a report is not proof that the drug was the cause. The reporter gives the outcome, and FDA does not verify it. FDA says:

The information in these reports has not been scientifically or otherwise verified as to a cause and effect relationship and cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events.

Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .

The six headings with the names of FDA are the outcome terms of FDA. A report can have more than one outcome. The columns Serious and Not serious are the two values of the openFDA field serious. For the value serious, openFDA gives this description:

The adverse event resulted in death, a life threatening condition, hospitalization, disability, congenital anomaly, or other serious condition

Source: openFDA, Drug adverse event fields (YAML reference). The site read the page on .

The year is the year of the openFDA file that holds the latest version of the report. It is not always the year in which FDA first received the report. The chart of the next section uses the year of first receipt. The latest year is not complete.

Reports by year and month

Reports that name Gliadel, by the year in which FDA received them
0501002004200720102013201620192023

The column of 2026 has an outline, because the year is not complete. It has the reports that FDA received through June 2026 only.

Show the figures of the chart as a table
Reports that name Gliadel, by the year in which FDA received them
YearReports
20046
200554
200665
200745
200837
200911
201021
201114
201216
201352
201437
201560
201619
201722
201819
201914
20206
202210
202310
20243
20262
Reports that name Gliadel, by month, five years to June 2026
03520222023202420252026

FDA releases FAERS data every quarter, so the newest months are not complete. They grow in later releases.

Why a count moves

A count moves for many reasons. The guide gives FDA's words about them.

Patients and reporters

Age of the patient in the reports that name Gliadel
AgeReportsShareShare as a bar
Under 210.2%
2 to 1110.2%
12 to 1781.5%
18 to 447514.3%
45 to 6415429.4%
65 to 746813%
75 and over254.8%
Age not given19136.5%
Sex of the patient in the reports that name Gliadel
SexReportsShareShare as a bar
Female17633.7%
Male24647%
Unknown or not given10119.3%
Type of reporter in the reports that name Gliadel
ReporterReportsShareShare as a bar
Physician23745.3%
Pharmacist112.1%
Other health professional17132.7%
Lawyer00%
Consumer or non-health professional407.6%
Not given6412.2%

Age and sex are as the report gives them. The reporter is the primary source in the report. 40.2% of the reports give the United States as the country.

Reason for use

Reason for use (indication) that the reports of Gliadel record
Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Glioblastoma multiforme16130.8%
Malignant glioma13024.9%
Glioblastoma6612.6%
Glioma193.6%
Astrocytoma malignant71.3%
Anaplastic astrocytoma40.8%

The reporter fills in the indication, and the field is often empty. Each share is of all 523 reports.

Pages near this one

These links are for navigation. No count selected them. The class page lists each drug of the class.

Official pages

The site checked these addresses on . The links open in a new tab.

Cite this page

Reported Reactions. Gliadel: adverse event reports that FDA received. https://reportedreactions.com/drug/gliadel/ Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) files, release of . Reports received through .

Where the data come from

The counts come from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk files, release of 1 Oct 2026. The files have the reports that FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. A drug name is the name on the report. The site matches it to a brand name or a generic name of the National Drug Code Directory of 2 Oct 2026. A class is the pharmacologic class (EPC) of the FDA label.

A report is in the count when it names Gliadel as a suspect or interacting product. The 31 reports that name it only as a concomitant medicine are not in the count. The site does not publish a report narrative, a lot number, a detail of a patient or the identity of a reporter. The record of FDA is the authority. See how the site counts reports, the data sources and the corrections page.

Questions

Do these reports show that Gliadel was responsible for the reactions?

No. FDA says:

For any given report, there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event.

Source: FDA, FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) Public Dashboard. Content current as of . The site read the page on .

A reaction can relate to the condition that the drug treats, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this the list of reactions on the label of Gliadel?

No. It is a count of what people reported to FDA: 523 reports from July 2004 to April 2026. The FDA-approved label of a product lists its adverse reactions. The official pages at the end of this page link to the labels.

Who sent these reports?

Physician (45.3%), other health professional (32.7%) and consumer or non-health professional (7.6%). These are the types of reporter for the reports that name this drug.

If a manufacturer receives an adverse event report, it is normally required to send the report to FDA.

Source: openFDA, Drug Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .

How does a person report an adverse event?

FDA runs MedWatch, a program that takes voluntary reports from health professionals, patients and consumers. The guide on how to report has the links.