Reported Reactions

Drugs

Product name as reported

Alfacalcidol: adverse event reports filed with FDA

754 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2004–2026.

754
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 34 a year
86
reports, 12 months to June 2026
119 in the 12 months before
98.8%
marked serious by the reporter
57.4% across all reports
32.5%
record death among outcomes, as reported
245 reports · not verified by FDA

754 adverse event reports received by FDA list the product name "Alfacalcidol" as reporters wrote it as a suspect or interacting product, from February 2004 to June 2026. A further 6,892 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 86 reports listed it, down 28% from 119 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 34 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

The MedDRA terms listed most often are off label use (21.9%), maternal exposure during pregnancy (18.7%) and condition aggravated (17.2%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 448 different terms appear across these reports. Off label use is recorded in 21.9% of these reports, against 4.1% of all reports in the database.

98.8% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter; 32.5% record death among the outcomes and 59.8% record hospitalisation, as reported. 50.9% of the reports came from other health professionals, and the largest patient age group is 18 to 44 (31.8%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

01530Jul 2021: 2Aug 2021: 0Sep 2021: 6Oct 2021: 5Nov 2021: 4Dec 2021: 92022Jan 2022: 14Feb 2022: 8Mar 2022: 9Apr 2022: 7May 2022: 2Jun 2022: 5Jul 2022: 1Aug 2022: 4Sep 2022: 2Oct 2022: 2Nov 2022: 4Dec 2022: 22023Jan 2023: 8Feb 2023: 10Mar 2023: 2Apr 2023: 3May 2023: 6Jun 2023: 10Jul 2023: 7Aug 2023: 5Sep 2023: 2Oct 2023: 3Nov 2023: 6Dec 2023: 42024Jan 2024: 1Feb 2024: 7Mar 2024: 8Apr 2024: 11May 2024: 12Jun 2024: 7Jul 2024: 4Aug 2024: 3Sep 2024: 11Oct 2024: 9Nov 2024: 7Dec 2024: 222025Jan 2025: 10Feb 2025: 4Mar 2025: 9Apr 2025: 3May 2025: 7Jun 2025: 30Jul 2025: 17Aug 2025: 8Sep 2025: 5Oct 2025: 7Nov 2025: 14Dec 2025: 92026Jan 2026: 2Feb 2026: 4Mar 2026: 5Apr 2026: 5May 2026: 7Jun 2026: 3

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

0621232004: 720042005: 22006: 42007: 520072008: 42009: 72010: 2220102011: 122012: 102013: 1720132014: 82015: 252016: 1720162017: 482018: 472019: 5520192020: 482021: 392022: 6020222023: 662024: 1022025: 12320252026: 26

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Alfacalcidol reports recording the termall reports in the database

  1. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label21.9%165
  2. Maternal exposure during pregnancythe mother took the medicine during pregnancy18.7%141
  3. Condition aggravatedthe condition being treated got worse17.2%130
  4. Lower respiratory tract infectiona chest infection15%113
  5. Headachehead pain14.3%108
  6. Folliculitis13.9%105
  7. Dyspnoeashortness of breath13.8%104
  8. Fatiguetiredness13.4%101
  9. Hypersensitivityan allergic-type reaction13.3%100
  10. Pyrexiafever12.3%93
  11. Confusional stateconfusion11.5%87
  12. Impaired healingslow healing11.5%87
  13. Joint swellinga swollen joint11.4%86
  14. Rashskin rash11.4%86
  15. Astheniaweakness or lack of energy11.3%85
  16. Nasopharyngitisa cold11.3%85
  17. Hypercalcaemiahigh blood calcium10.6%80
  18. Overlap syndrome10.6%80
  19. Contusiona bruise10.5%79
  20. Intentional product use issuedeliberate use not as intended10.3%78
  21. Swellingswelling10.1%76
  22. Blistera blister9.9%75
  23. Night sweatssweating at night9.9%75
  24. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected9.5%72
  25. Pruritusitching9.4%71

Top 30 of 448 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the share of all reports in the database; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death32.5%245
Life-threatening24%181
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)59.8%451
Disability20.8%157
Congenital anomaly6.2%47
Other serious65.4%493
Not serious1.2%9

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 20,646,523 reports. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 21.2%9
2 to 114%30
12 to 170.1%1
18 to 4431.8%240
45 to 6412.6%95
65 to 7410.5%79
75 and over20.7%156
Age not given19.1%144

Patient sex

Female63.3%477
Male22.5%170
Not given14.2%107

Who reported

Physician34.7%262
Pharmacist4.5%34
Other health professional50.9%384
Lawyer0%0
Consumer or non-health professional7.8%59
Not given2%15

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 1.9% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Vitamin supplementation243.2%
Hypocalcaemia212.8%
Osteoporosis202.7%
Hypoparathyroidism172.3%
Chronic kidney disease121.6%
Hyperparathyroidism111.5%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 754 reports.

In context

MeasureAlfacalcidolAll reports
Reports as suspect product75420,646,523
Share of that pool—0%
Reports, latest 12 months861,332,454
Marked serious98.8%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports32591
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports598213
Consumer-filed share7.8%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsOff label use 21.9%4.1%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Questions about Alfacalcidol reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Alfacalcidol?

754 reports list Alfacalcidol as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 86 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 6,892 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Alfacalcidol reports?

off label use (21.9%), maternal exposure during pregnancy (18.7%), condition aggravated (17.2%), lower respiratory tract infection (15%) and headache (14.3%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Alfacalcidol was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

98.8% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 32.5% of reports include death and 59.8% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

other health professional (50.9%), physician (34.7%) and consumer or non-health professional (7.8%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Alfacalcidol rising?

86 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, down 28% from 119 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Alfacalcidol was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Alfacalcidol?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Alfacalcidol as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (6,892) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.