Reported Reactions

Drugs › Insulin analog

Brand name · Insulin lispro

Admelog: adverse event reports filed with FDA

958 reports list it as a suspect or interacting product, 2018–2026. Class: Insulin analog.

958
reports as suspect product
0% of all reports · about 120 a year
145
reports, 12 months to June 2026
117 in the 12 months before
21.3%
marked serious by the reporter
42.7% across the class
0.7%
record death among outcomes, as reported
7 reports · not verified by FDA

958 adverse event reports received by FDA list the brand name Admelog (insulin lispro) as a suspect or interacting product, from July 2018 to June 2026. A further 618 reports list it only as a concomitant medication, and those are not counted in the figures on this page.

In the 12 months to June 2026, 145 reports listed it, up 24% from 117 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Over its reporting history that is about 120 reports a year and 0% of the 20,646,523 reports in the database, and 0.3% of the reports for the insulin analog class. How many people take it is not in the data, so a count is not a rate of occurrence.

The reactions recorded most often are blood glucose increased (24%), product storage error (12.8%) and drug ineffective (12.2%). A report can list several reactions, so shares add to more than 100%; 137 different terms appear across these reports. Blood glucose increased is recorded in 24% of these reports, about the same share as in the median insulin analog drug (23%).

21.3% of the reports are marked serious by the reporter (42.7% across the class); 0.7% record death among the outcomes and 5.6% record hospitalisation, as reported. 68% of the reports came from consumers, and the largest patient age group is 45 to 64 (24.8%). FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event."

Reports by month, five years

01020Jul 2021: 9Aug 2021: 6Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 13Nov 2021: 13Dec 2021: 72022Jan 2022: 4Feb 2022: 14Mar 2022: 20Apr 2022: 9May 2022: 10Jun 2022: 8Jul 2022: 10Aug 2022: 5Sep 2022: 14Oct 2022: 6Nov 2022: 5Dec 2022: 42023Jan 2023: 6Feb 2023: 3Mar 2023: 9Apr 2023: 4May 2023: 6Jun 2023: 10Jul 2023: 11Aug 2023: 3Sep 2023: 9Oct 2023: 7Nov 2023: 6Dec 2023: 72024Jan 2024: 5Feb 2024: 11Mar 2024: 7Apr 2024: 7May 2024: 14Jun 2024: 10Jul 2024: 8Aug 2024: 5Sep 2024: 2Oct 2024: 14Nov 2024: 13Dec 2024: 152025Jan 2025: 11Feb 2025: 5Mar 2025: 19Apr 2025: 10May 2025: 8Jun 2025: 7Jul 2025: 12Aug 2025: 12Sep 2025: 14Oct 2025: 14Nov 2025: 6Dec 2025: 162026Jan 2026: 9Feb 2026: 17Mar 2026: 2Apr 2026: 14May 2026: 19Jun 2026: 10

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases.

By year received

0861722018: 4620182019: 17220192020: 12320202021: 11120212022: 10920222023: 8120232024: 11120242025: 13420252026: 712026

2026 covers reports received through June 2026 only.

Reactions recorded in the reports

share of Admelog reports recording the termmedian drug in insulin analog

  1. Blood glucose increasedraised blood sugar reading24%230
  2. Product storage errorthe product was stored wrongly12.8%123
  3. Drug ineffectivethe medicine did not work as expected12.2%117
  4. Off label useused for a purpose or in a way not on the label9.1%87
  5. Diabetes mellitus inadequate controldiabetes not well controlled5.8%56
  6. Device operational issue3.8%36
  7. Blood glucose decreasedlow blood sugar reading3.2%31
  8. Intentional product misusedeliberate use not as intended3%29
  9. Visual impairmentreduced vision2.9%28
  10. Product substitution issuea problem after switching products2.7%26
  11. Device issuea problem with the device2.3%22
  12. Product dose omissiona dose was missed2.1%20
  13. Product quality issuea problem with the product itself1.9%18
  14. Injection site painpain where the injection was given1.8%17
  15. Hyperglycaemiahigh blood sugar1.7%16
  16. Headachehead pain1.6%15
  17. Malaisegeneral feeling of being unwell1.6%15
  18. Nauseafeeling sick1.5%14
  19. Inappropriate schedule of product administrationthe product was taken at the wrong times1.4%13
  20. Product use issuea problem in how the product was used1.3%12
  21. Therapeutic response decreasedthe medicine worked less well1.3%12
  22. Wrong technique in product usage processthe product was used in the wrong way1.3%12
  23. Product dose omission issuea dose was missed1.1%11
  24. Product temperature excursion issue1.1%11

Top 30 of 137 MedDRA preferred terms recorded across these reports, with a plain-language gloss where one is available. One report can record several terms. The hollow bar is the median share across the 26 drugs in the insulin analog class; it describes the reports, not the patients. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Outcomes recorded

Death0.7%7
Life-threatening1.5%14
Hospitalisation (initial or prolonged)5.6%54
Disability1.7%16
Congenital anomaly0.1%1
Other serious16.6%159
Not serious78.7%754

Outcome flags as the reporter set them; a report can carry several, and "other serious" is FDA's own category for serious reports outside the named outcomes. Grey bar: all 289,293 reports in the class. FDA has not verified any outcome and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence of these events."

Patients and reporters

Patient age

Under 20.2%2
2 to 111.9%18
12 to 172.5%24
18 to 4414.4%138
45 to 6424.8%238
65 to 7411.1%106
75 and over7.6%73
Age not given37.5%359

Patient sex

Female43%412
Male35.5%340
Not given21.5%206

Who reported

Physician4.4%42
Pharmacist8.2%79
Other health professional16.7%160
Lawyer0.1%1
Consumer or non-health professional68%651
Not given2.6%25

Age and sex as stated in the report; the reporter's qualification is the primary source recorded by FDA. 95.2% of reports give the United States as the country of the event or reporter.

Reason for use recorded

Indication as recorded (MedDRA)ReportsShare
Type 2 diabetes mellitus22023%
Type 1 diabetes mellitus18919.7%
Diabetes mellitus15616.3%
Blood glucose abnormal222.3%
Blood glucose increased212.2%
Diabetic ketoacidosis40.4%

The indication field is filled in by the reporter and is often blank; shares are of all 958 reports.

Drugs most often listed in the same reports

Drug (any role in the report)ReportsShare of Admelog reports
Insulin glargine666.9%
Lantus636.6%
Humalog555.7%
Lantus Solostar495.1%
Soliqua 100/33485%
Toujeo363.8%
Novolog293%
Apidra252.6%
Tresiba181.9%
Metformin121.3%

Other products listed in reports where Admelog is a suspect product, whatever their own role. Co-listing means the two were recorded together; it says nothing about either product's part in the event. Only the 2,500 most-reported names are counted here.

In context

MeasureAdmelogInsulin analogAll reports
Reports as suspect product958289,29320,646,523
Share of that pool—0.3%0%
Reports, latest 12 months145—1,332,454
Marked serious21.3%42.7%57.4%
Death recorded among outcomes, per 1,000 reports73591
Hospitalisation recorded, per 1,000 reports56186213
Consumer-filed share68%78.7%45.8%
Top term, share of reportsBlood glucose increased 24%median 23%0.9%

Shares are of reports, not of patients treated. The number of people taking a product is not in the data, so none of these figures is a rate, and differences between columns reflect who takes a product, who reports and how long it has been sold. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic."

Other drugs in the insulin analog class

DrugName typeReportsLatest 12 monthsMarked serious
Humalogbrand71,1742,31234.4%
Lantus Solostarbrand45,7154,23024.6%
Lantusbrand39,1283,71863.8%
Insulin glarginegeneric27,9941,92342.8%
Toujeobrand15,4911,33224.7%
Novologbrand14,4771,57661.8%
Levemirbrand13,65267154.8%
Tresibabrand10,3731,26355.1%
Insulin lisprogeneric8,2091,11645.6%
Humalog Mix75/25brand8,13914023.8%
Insulingeneric8,13552288.9%
Apidrabrand3,6218669.2%
Insulin aspartgeneric3,23255388.6%
Sterile diluentgeneric3,22160019.4%
Humalog Kwikpenbrand3,04016927.5%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that adverse event reports "represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product", that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product", and that the data "by themselves are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug or biologic." A brand and its generic are separate rows because reporters name them separately.

Questions about Admelog reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for Admelog?

958 reports list Admelog as a suspect or interacting product in the openFDA FAERS release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through June 2026. 145 of them arrived in the latest 12 months. Another 618 list it only as a concomitant medication.

What reactions are recorded in Admelog reports?

blood glucose increased (24%), product storage error (12.8%), drug ineffective (12.2%), off label use (9.1%) and diabetes mellitus inadequate control (5.8%). These are MedDRA preferred terms coded from what the reporter described; a report can list several, and a term's presence is not a finding that Admelog was responsible.

How serious are the reports?

21.3% are marked serious by the reporter. Among the outcomes recorded, 0.7% of reports include death and 5.6% include hospitalisation. FDA has not verified these outcomes and states that the reports "cannot be used to estimate the incidence" of the events.

Who files these reports?

consumer or non-health professional (68%), other health professional (16.7%) and pharmacist (8.2%). Most reports reach FDA through the manufacturer, which must forward reports it receives.

Are reports for Admelog rising?

145 reports in the 12 months to June 2026, up 24% from 117 in the 12 months before. FDA releases FAERS data quarterly, so the newest months are incomplete and grow in later releases. Counts also move with how many people take a product, its time on the market and publicity.

Do these reports show that Admelog was responsible for these reactions?

No. FDA states that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report" and that for any given report "there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the event." The reaction may relate to the condition being treated, to other medicines, or to something else.

Is this a list of the side effects of Admelog?

No. It is a count of what was reported to FDA. The adverse reactions observed in clinical studies are printed on the FDA-approved label, which a pharmacist or clinician can go through with you.

How do I report an adverse event?

Consumers and health professionals can report to FDA through MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 online, or 1-800-FDA-1088), or to the manufacturer, which must pass reports on. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Drug Adverse Event (FAERS) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 30 Jun 2026. Drug names are as reported, resolved to the brand or generic name on the FDA label where openFDA's harmonisation matched them; classes are the pharmacologic class (EPC) from the label and the National Drug Code Directory of 17 Sep 2026. A report counts here when it lists Admelog as a suspect or interacting product; reports listing it only as a concomitant medication (618) are excluded. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.