Device brand name · Porcine surgical mesh
XenMatrix: medical device reports filed with FDA
278 reports name it, 2009–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Davol Sub C R Bard. Product code FTM.
- 278
- device reports naming the brand
- 0% of all MAUDE reports · about 17 a year
- 8
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 11 in the 12 months before
- 3.6%
- classified as malfunction
- 5.2% across the product code
- 0.7%
- classified as death, as reported
- 2 reports · not verified by FDA
FDA's MAUDE database holds 278 reports that name the brand "XenMatrix" (porcine surgical mesh), received between October 2009 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Davol Sub C R Bard. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.
8 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 27% from 11 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (95.3%), malfunction (3.6%) and death (0.7%); across all mesh, surgical reports (product code FTM) death is recorded in 0.4% and malfunction in 5.2%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.
The device problems coded most often are defective device (34.2%), patient device interaction problem (26.3%) and insufficient device problem information (21.6%). The patient problems coded most often are pain, hernia and injury. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
By year received
Event type and report source
Event type, as classified on the report
Who filed the report
Grey bar: all 11,623 reports carrying product code FTM. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share | Share across product code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defective devicethe device was defective | 95 | 34.2% | 1.1% |
| Patient device interaction problem | 73 | 26.3% | 1.9% |
| Insufficient device problem information | 60 | 21.6% | 36.3% |
| Patient-device incompatibilitythe device did not suit the patient | 35 | 12.6% | 2.2% |
| Material disintegration | 16 | 5.8% | 0.9% |
| Nonstandard device | 10 | 3.6% | 0.2% |
| Torn material | 5 | 1.8% | 0.8% |
| Split | 4 | 1.4% | 0.4% |
| Tear, rip or hole in device packaging | 4 | 1.4% | 0% |
| Degraded | 3 | 1.1% | 0.6% |
| Detachment of device component | 3 | 1.1% | 0.8% |
| Device dislodged or dislocated | 3 | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly | 3 | 1.1% | 1.7% |
| Hole in material | 3 | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Material fragmentation | 3 | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| Material separation | 3 | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| Device or device fragments location unknown | 2 | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| Improper or incorrect procedure or method | 2 | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| Expiration date error | 1 | 0.4% | 0% |
| Material deformation | 1 | 0.4% | 0.5% |
FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.
Patient problems coded
| Patient problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Painpain, site not specified | 55 | 19.8% |
| Hernia | 26 | 9.4% |
| Injurya physical injury | 23 | 8.3% |
| Bacterial infectiona bacterial infection | 20 | 7.2% |
| Seromaa collection of fluid under the skin | 13 | 4.7% |
| Abscessa collection of pus | 11 | 4% |
| Wound dehiscencea wound reopened | 11 | 4% |
| Adhesion(s) | 9 | 3.2% |
| Disability | 9 | 3.2% |
| Fistula | 8 | 2.9% |
| Sepsisa severe body-wide response to infection | 7 | 2.5% |
| Impaired healingslow healing | 5 | 1.8% |
| Abdominal painstomach or belly pain | 4 | 1.4% |
| Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term | 3 | 1.1% |
| Necrosisdeath of tissue | 3 | 1.1% |
Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.
In context
| Measure | XenMatrix | Product code FTM | All MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | 278 | 11,623 | 26,136,888 |
| Share of that pool | — | 2.4% | 0% |
| Classified as death, per 1,000 reports | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| Classified as injury | 95.3% | 87.1% | 36.2% |
| Classified as malfunction | 3.6% | 5.2% | 62.3% |
| Filed by the manufacturer | 98.2% | 96.2% | 94.9% |
Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Other brands with product code FTM
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unspecified By Complainant | 2,005 | 0 | 0% |
| Gynecare Mesh Unknown | 5,830 | 3 | 0.1% |
| Pelvisoft Acellular Collagen Biomesh | 1,016 | 0 | 0% |
| Xenform | 781 | 0 | 0% |
| Strattice | 320 | 0 | 1.9% |
| Unknown Strattice | 295 | 47 | 0.7% |
| Mesh Tsl - Permacol | 305 | 4 | 2.6% |
| Permacol | 380 | 1 | 0.5% |
| Unk - Unspecified By The Complainant | 272 | 0 | 0% |
| Orthadapt Bioimplant | 197 | 0 | 0% |
| Biodesign 4-Layer Tissue Graft | 204 | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown - Unspecified By The Complainant | 241 | 0 | 0% |
| Veritas Collagen Matrix | 206 | 0 | 0.5% |
| Uphold Vaginal Support System | 1,861 | 0 | 0.1% |
| Unspecified By The Complainant | 545 | 0 | 0% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."
Questions about XenMatrix reports
How many FDA reports name XenMatrix?
278 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 8 in the latest 12 months.
What kinds of events are reported?
injury (95.3%), malfunction (3.6%) and death (0.7%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.
What device problems are coded?
defective device (34.2%), patient device interaction problem (26.3%), insufficient device problem information (21.6%), patient-device incompatibility (12.6%) and material disintegration (5.8%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.
Who files these reports?
manufacturer reports (98.2%) and voluntary reports (0.4%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.
Do these reports show that XenMatrix was at fault?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."
How do I report a problem with a medical device?
Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.