Reported Reactions

Devices › Fibrin sealant preparation device

Device brand name · Fibrin sealant preparation device

Vistaseal Dual Applicator: medical device reports filed with FDA

228 reports name it, 2020–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Ethicon. Product code MZM.

228
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 38 a year
32
reports, 12 months to August 2026
43 in the 12 months before
100%
classified as malfunction
98.6% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

228 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Vistaseal Dual Applicator" (fibrin sealant preparation device); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Ethicon; received from June 2020 to August 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

32 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 26% from 43 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (100%); across all fibrin sealant preparation device reports (product code MZM) death is recorded in 0.7% and malfunction in 98.6%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are failure to disconnect (68.4%), material integrity problem (8.8%) and break (5.3%). FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

01122Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 0Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 15Mar 2022: 22Apr 2022: 8May 2022: 2Jun 2022: 11Jul 2022: 3Aug 2022: 2Sep 2022: 5Oct 2022: 6Nov 2022: 4Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 1Feb 2023: 2Mar 2023: 0Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 3Jun 2023: 8Jul 2023: 2Aug 2023: 2Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 2Dec 2023: 32024Jan 2024: 2Feb 2024: 4Mar 2024: 2Apr 2024: 9May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 4Jul 2024: 1Aug 2024: 2Sep 2024: 5Oct 2024: 6Nov 2024: 2Dec 2024: 42025Jan 2025: 1Feb 2025: 2Mar 2025: 6Apr 2025: 2May 2025: 6Jun 2025: 3Jul 2025: 4Aug 2025: 2Sep 2025: 2Oct 2025: 9Nov 2025: 4Dec 2025: 12026Jan 2026: 1Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 3Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 3Jun 2026: 5Jul 2026: 2Aug 2026: 2

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

039782020: 1720202021: 1020212022: 7820222023: 2320232024: 4220242025: 4220252026: 162026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury0%0
Malfunction100%228
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report99.6%227
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0.4%1

Grey bar: all 423 reports carrying product code MZM. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Failure to disconnect15668.4%55.6%
Material integrity problema problem with the device material208.8%7.8%
Breakthe device broke125.3%7.8%
Component misassembled62.6%1.4%
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off41.8%0.9%
Connection problema connection problem20.9%1.9%
Difficult to open or close20.9%0.7%
Material separation20.9%3.3%
Activation, positioning or separation problem10.4%0.2%
Component missing10.4%0.2%
Contamination10.4%0.2%
Delivered as unsterile product10.4%0.2%
Device contaminated during manufacture or shipping10.4%0.7%
Device stenosis10.4%0.5%
Firing problem10.4%0.2%
Physical resistance/sticking10.4%0.5%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

In context

MeasureVistaseal Dual ApplicatorProduct code MZMAll MAUDE reports
Reports22842326,136,888
Share of that pool—53.9%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports079
Classified as injury0%0.2%36.2%
Classified as malfunction100%98.6%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer99.6%95.5%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Questions about Vistaseal Dual Applicator reports

How many FDA reports name Vistaseal Dual Applicator?

228 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 32 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (100%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

failure to disconnect (68.4%), material integrity problem (8.8%), break (5.3%), component misassembled (2.6%) and detachment of device or device component (1.8%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (99.6%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Vistaseal Dual Applicator was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.