Reported Reactions

Devices › Permanent pacemaker electrode

Device brand name · Implantable pacing lead

Spectraflex: medical device reports filed with FDA

609 reports name it, 1997–2025. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Medtronic Puerto Rico. Product code DTB.

609
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 21 a year
0
reports, 12 months to August 2026
11 in the 12 months before
30%
classified as malfunction
43.9% across the product code
4.9%
classified as death, as reported
30 reports · not verified by FDA

609 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Spectraflex" (implantable pacing lead); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Medtronic Puerto Rico; received from February 1997 to August 2025. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

0 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, against 11 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (64.7%), malfunction (30%) and death (4.9%); across all permanent pacemaker electrode reports (product code DTB) death is recorded in 2.9% and malfunction in 43.9%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are failure to capture (10.7%), lead(s), fracture of (9.5%) and low impedance (9.4%). The patient problems coded most often are death, muscle stimulation and syncope. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

059Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 1Nov 2021: 1Dec 2021: 12022Jan 2022: 1Feb 2022: 4Mar 2022: 1Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 1Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 0Aug 2022: 1Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 9Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 12023Jan 2023: 1Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 0Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 1Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 3Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 2Feb 2024: 2Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 2Jun 2024: 0Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 1Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 1Nov 2024: 1Dec 2024: 12025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 1Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 3Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 1Aug 2025: 3Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

037741997: 7419971998: 501999: 132000: 3620002001: 272002: 112003: 820032004: 132005: 152006: 1320062007: 132008: 162009: 3620092010: 302011: 372012: 3220122013: 192014: 172015: 2120152016: 152017: 162018: 2020182019: 112020: 92021: 1420212022: 182023: 72024: 1020242025: 8

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death4.9%30
Injury64.7%394
Malfunction30%183
Other0%0
Not given0.3%2

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report99.8%608
Voluntary report0.2%1
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 327,317 reports carrying product code DTB. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Failure to capture6510.7%9.7%
Lead(s), fracture of589.5%0.9%
Low impedance579.4%5.3%
High capture threshold376.1%12.3%
High sensing threshold365.9%2.3%
Over-sensing345.6%13.2%
Under-sensing345.6%17.1%
Fracturea broken bone325.3%4.8%
Other (for use when an appropriate device code cannot be identified)325.3%0.5%
High impedance315.1%10.7%
Insulation, hole(s) in254.1%0.2%
Loss of threshold243.9%0.7%
Performance223.6%0.1%
Breakthe device broke183%1.8%
Capturing problem183%4.2%
Signal artifact/noise183%5.2%
Impedance problem162.6%4.3%
Device issuea problem with the device122%0.1%
Failure to sense111.8%1%
Pacing problem111.8%5%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term335.4%
Muscle stimulation172.8%
Syncopefainting61%
Bradycardiaslow heart rate50.8%
Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness50.8%
Discomfortdiscomfort40.7%
Arrhythmia20.3%
Atrial fibrillationan irregular heart rhythm20.3%
Device overstimulation of tissue20.3%
Fainting20.3%
Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient20.3%
Hypersensitivity/allergic reaction20.3%
Palpitationsawareness of the heartbeat20.3%
Sepsisa severe body-wide response to infection20.3%
Surgical procedure20.3%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureSpectraflexProduct code DTBAll MAUDE reports
Reports609327,31726,136,888
Share of that pool—0.2%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports49299
Classified as injury64.7%53.1%36.2%
Classified as malfunction30%43.9%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer99.8%96.8%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code DTB

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
CapSureFix Novus Lead MRI SureScan108,10317,5541%
Capsurefix Novus57,53846.8%
CapSureFix Novus MRI SureScan18,9093,2431.3%
CapSure Sense Lead MRI SureScan8,7741,3371%
CapSure SP8,2232263.9%
Capsurefix7,28406.3%
Permanent Pacemaker Electrode5,0413320.4%
Capsure Sp Novus4,80309.5%
Capsure Sense4,74006.4%
Flextend6,8362030.7%
Attain Otw7,77309.1%
Tendril Sdx8,31632.3%
CapSure Epicardial Lead4,8427601.5%
Tendril Sts54,0364,3203.1%
CapSure SP Novus Lead2,7153311.1%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Spectraflex reports

How many FDA reports name Spectraflex?

609 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 0 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (64.7%), malfunction (30%) and death (4.9%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

failure to capture (10.7%), lead(s), fracture of (9.5%), low impedance (9.4%), high capture threshold (6.1%) and high sensing threshold (5.9%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (99.8%) and voluntary reports (0.2%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Spectraflex was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.