Reported Reactions

Devices › Permanent defibrillator electrodes

Device brand name · Defibrillation lead

Riata St Passive Fixation: medical device reports filed with FDA

1,073 reports name it, 2008–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: St Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division. Product code NVY.

1,073
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 58 a year
23
reports, 12 months to August 2026
22 in the 12 months before
37.1%
classified as malfunction
41.2% across the product code
1.4%
classified as death, as reported
15 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 1,073 reports that name the brand "Riata St Passive Fixation" (defibrillation lead), received between January 2008 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is St Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

23 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, close to the 22 of the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (61.3%), malfunction (37.1%) and death (1.4%); across all permanent defibrillator electrodes reports (product code NVY) death is recorded in 2.2% and malfunction in 41.2%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are over-sensing (30.6%), high impedance (25.4%) and break (21.9%). The patient problems coded most often are surgical procedure, failure of implant and shock from patient lead(s). FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

036Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 1Nov 2021: 1Dec 2021: 22022Jan 2022: 2Feb 2022: 6Mar 2022: 6Apr 2022: 1May 2022: 4Jun 2022: 2Jul 2022: 2Aug 2022: 0Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 3Nov 2022: 2Dec 2022: 32023Jan 2023: 3Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 1Apr 2023: 2May 2023: 2Jun 2023: 1Jul 2023: 4Aug 2023: 3Sep 2023: 2Oct 2023: 2Nov 2023: 4Dec 2023: 22024Jan 2024: 2Feb 2024: 4Mar 2024: 5Apr 2024: 3May 2024: 2Jun 2024: 5Jul 2024: 3Aug 2024: 2Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 3Nov 2024: 0Dec 2024: 22025Jan 2025: 3Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 3May 2025: 2Jun 2025: 3Jul 2025: 3Aug 2025: 3Sep 2025: 3Oct 2025: 2Nov 2025: 3Dec 2025: 12026Jan 2026: 3Feb 2026: 3Mar 2026: 1Apr 2026: 1May 2026: 1Jun 2026: 1Jul 2026: 1Aug 2026: 3

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

0741482008: 2120082009: 492010: 6720102011: 632012: 5520122013: 1102014: 14820142015: 1132016: 7720162017: 682018: 6520182019: 422020: 4520202021: 222022: 3120222023: 262024: 3120242025: 262026: 142026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death1.4%15
Injury61.3%658
Malfunction37.1%398
Other0%0
Not given0.2%2

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%1,073
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 138,578 reports carrying product code NVY. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Over-sensing32830.6%22.8%
High impedance27325.4%20%
Breakthe device broke23521.9%8.8%
High capture threshold10710%8.1%
Inappropriate/inadequate shock/stimulation1019.4%8.5%
Low impedance857.9%6%
Fracturea broken bone696.4%5.4%
Signal artifact/noise615.7%6.6%
Failure to capture524.8%8.1%
High sensing threshold383.5%0.3%
Naturally worn312.9%0.5%
Low sensing threshold302.8%1.1%
Capturing problem272.5%3.7%
Invalid sensing242.2%0.1%
Device dislodged or dislocated222.1%10.9%
Impedance problem222.1%3.1%
Decreased sensitivity212%2%
Device sensing problem201.9%5%
Noise141.3%0.1%
Failure to sense131.2%0.9%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Surgical procedure423.9%
Failure of implant403.7%
Shock from patient lead(s)302.8%
Cardiac perforation131.2%
Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term131.2%
Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient90.8%
Therapeutic effects, unexpected70.7%
Arrhythmia60.6%
Ventricular fibrillationa chaotic rhythm from the lower heart chambers50.5%
Fainting40.4%
Muscle stimulation40.4%
Chest painchest pain30.3%
Device overstimulation of tissue30.3%
Discomfortdiscomfort30.3%
Perforation30.3%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureRiata St Passive FixationProduct code NVYAll MAUDE reports
Reports1,073138,57826,136,888
Share of that pool—0.8%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports14229
Classified as injury61.3%56.5%36.2%
Classified as malfunction37.1%41.2%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%97.3%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code NVY

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Durata Sts Optim Active Fixation Df-4 Connector27,8281,7843.9%
Endotak Reliance25,8972381.2%
Riata Active Fixation13,753961.8%
Sprint Quattro Secure MRI SureScan15,6061,9031.4%
Optisure Active Fixation Df-4 Connector6,5626234.3%
Endotak Reliance Sg8,2881,0830.5%
Sprint Quattro Secure24,23725.2%
Riata St Active Fixation5,416762.2%
Reliance 4-Front9,8522,0240.4%
Isoflex Optim Lead7,8894372%
Durata Sts Optim Active Fixation9,6813015.6%
Riata Passive Fixation4,318321.2%
Endotak Reliance G10,1151,0490.6%
Plexa ProMRI S 652,5212450.6%
Permanent Defibrillator Electrodes2,5242300.6%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Riata St Passive Fixation reports

How many FDA reports name Riata St Passive Fixation?

1,073 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 23 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (61.3%), malfunction (37.1%) and death (1.4%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

over-sensing (30.6%), high impedance (25.4%), break (21.9%), high capture threshold (10%) and inappropriate/inadequate shock/stimulation (9.4%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Riata St Passive Fixation was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.