Reported Reactions

Devices › Permanent defibrillator electrodes

Device brand name · Defibrillation lead

Riata St Optim Passive Fixation: medical device reports filed with FDA

493 reports name it, 2007–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: St Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division. Product code NVY.

493
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 26 a year
5
reports, 12 months to August 2026
7 in the 12 months before
34.1%
classified as malfunction
41.2% across the product code
6.5%
classified as death, as reported
32 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 493 reports that name the brand "Riata St Optim Passive Fixation" (defibrillation lead), received between May 2007 and June 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is St Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

5 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 29% from 7 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (59.4%), malfunction (34.1%) and death (6.5%); across all permanent defibrillator electrodes reports (product code NVY) death is recorded in 2.2% and malfunction in 41.2%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are over-sensing (30%), high impedance (28.8%) and high capture threshold (10.8%). The patient problems coded most often are death, surgical procedure and shock from patient lead(s). FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

023Sep 2021: 2Oct 2021: 3Nov 2021: 1Dec 2021: 32022Jan 2022: 1Feb 2022: 2Mar 2022: 1Apr 2022: 1May 2022: 2Jun 2022: 1Jul 2022: 1Aug 2022: 2Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 1Nov 2022: 2Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 1Feb 2023: 2Mar 2023: 0Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 1Oct 2023: 3Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 1Apr 2024: 1May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 2Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 2Sep 2024: 1Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 0Dec 2024: 12025Jan 2025: 1Feb 2025: 1Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 1Aug 2025: 2Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 2Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 1Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 1Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 1Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

035692007: 320072008: 172009: 3420092010: 262011: 1820112012: 142013: 2920132014: 692015: 4820152016: 332017: 4220172018: 402019: 3420192020: 242021: 2020212022: 142023: 920232024: 92025: 720252026: 3

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death6.5%32
Injury59.4%293
Malfunction34.1%168
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%493
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 138,578 reports carrying product code NVY. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Over-sensing14830%22.8%
High impedance14228.8%20%
High capture threshold5310.8%8.1%
Fracturea broken bone428.5%5.4%
Failure to capture408.1%8.1%
Inappropriate/inadequate shock/stimulation397.9%8.5%
Signal artifact/noise367.3%6.6%
Breakthe device broke306.1%8.8%
Low impedance234.7%6%
Device dislodged or dislocated224.5%10.9%
High sensing threshold214.3%0.3%
Decreased sensitivity173.4%2%
Invalid sensing142.8%0.1%
Low sensing threshold122.4%1.1%
Capturing problem81.6%3.7%
Dislodged81.6%0%
Impedance problem81.6%3.1%
Implant, repositioning of71.4%0%
Device sensing problem51%5%
Explanted51%0%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term316.3%
Surgical procedure306.1%
Shock from patient lead(s)163.2%
Cardiac perforation102%
Failure of implant81.6%
Therapeutic effects, unexpected71.4%
Discomfortdiscomfort61.2%
Device overstimulation of tissue51%
Perforation40.8%
Twiddlers syndrome30.6%
Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness20.4%
Exit block20.4%
Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient20.4%
Heart failure20.4%
Hematomaa collection of blood under the skin or in tissue20.4%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureRiata St Optim Passive FixationProduct code NVYAll MAUDE reports
Reports493138,57826,136,888
Share of that pool—0.4%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports65229
Classified as injury59.4%56.5%36.2%
Classified as malfunction34.1%41.2%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%97.3%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code NVY

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Durata Sts Optim Active Fixation Df-4 Connector27,8281,7843.9%
Endotak Reliance25,8972381.2%
Riata Active Fixation13,753961.8%
Sprint Quattro Secure MRI SureScan15,6061,9031.4%
Optisure Active Fixation Df-4 Connector6,5626234.3%
Endotak Reliance Sg8,2881,0830.5%
Sprint Quattro Secure24,23725.2%
Riata St Active Fixation5,416762.2%
Reliance 4-Front9,8522,0240.4%
Isoflex Optim Lead7,8894372%
Durata Sts Optim Active Fixation9,6813015.6%
Riata Passive Fixation4,318321.2%
Endotak Reliance G10,1151,0490.6%
Plexa ProMRI S 652,5212450.6%
Permanent Defibrillator Electrodes2,5242300.6%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Riata St Optim Passive Fixation reports

How many FDA reports name Riata St Optim Passive Fixation?

493 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 5 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (59.4%), malfunction (34.1%) and death (6.5%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

over-sensing (30%), high impedance (28.8%), high capture threshold (10.8%), fracture (8.5%) and failure to capture (8.1%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Riata St Optim Passive Fixation was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.