Devices › Nasopharyngoscope (flexible or rigid)
Device brand name · Rhino-laryngo videoscope
Rhino-Laryngo Videoscope: medical device reports filed with FDA
1,925 reports name it, 2019–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Shirakawa Olympus. Product code EOB.
- 1,925
- device reports naming the brand
- 0% of all MAUDE reports · about 278 a year
- 1,452
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 182 in the 12 months before
- 99.5%
- classified as malfunction
- 98.6% across the product code
- 0%
- classified as death, as reported
- 0 reports · not verified by FDA
1,925 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Rhino-Laryngo Videoscope" (rhino-laryngo videoscope); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Shirakawa Olympus; received from August 2019 to August 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.
1,452 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 698% from 182 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (99.5%) and injury (0.5%); across all nasopharyngoscope (flexible or rigid) reports (product code EOB) death is recorded in 0% and malfunction in 98.6%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.
The device problems coded most often are detachment of device or device component (24.3%), failure to clean adequately (15.8%) and device reprocessing problem (9.8%). The patient problems coded most often are appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available and discomfort. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
By year received
Event type and report source
Event type, as classified on the report
Who filed the report
Grey bar: all 8,127 reports carrying product code EOB. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share | Share across product code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off | 467 | 24.3% | 9% |
| Failure to clean adequately | 304 | 15.8% | 6% |
| Device reprocessing problem | 188 | 9.8% | 3.6% |
| Peeled/delaminated | 173 | 9% | 3.2% |
| Corrodedthe device corroded | 138 | 7.2% | 2.5% |
| Material fragmentation | 131 | 6.8% | 2.3% |
| Breakthe device broke | 105 | 5.5% | 23.8% |
| Loss of or failure to bond | 80 | 4.2% | 1.7% |
| Crackthe device cracked | 73 | 3.8% | 1.5% |
| Degraded | 64 | 3.3% | 1.2% |
| Material separation | 58 | 3% | 1.2% |
| Residue after decontamination | 54 | 2.8% | 1% |
| Contamination | 45 | 2.3% | 1.1% |
| Material split, cut or torn | 40 | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| Poor quality image | 35 | 1.8% | 1.4% |
| Material deformation | 28 | 1.5% | 0.6% |
| Contamination /decontamination problem | 22 | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Microbial contamination of device | 21 | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Component missing | 18 | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| No display/image | 18 | 0.9% | 10.2% |
FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.
Patient problems coded
| Patient problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available | 3 | 0.2% |
| Discomfortdiscomfort | 1 | 0.1% |
Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.
In context
| Measure | Rhino-Laryngo Videoscope | Product code EOB | All MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | 1,925 | 8,127 | 26,136,888 |
| Share of that pool | — | 23.7% | 0% |
| Classified as death, per 1,000 reports | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Classified as injury | 0.5% | 1.3% | 36.2% |
| Classified as malfunction | 99.5% | 98.6% | 62.3% |
| Filed by the manufacturer | 100% | 99.4% | 94.9% |
Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Other brands with product code EOB
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pentax | 47,288 | 2,443 | 0.1% |
| Rhino-Laryngofiberscope | 331 | 287 | 0% |
| Visera Rhino-Laryngo Videoscope | 283 | 194 | 0% |
| Rhino-Laryngo Fiberscope | 267 | 145 | 0% |
| PENTAX Medical | 1,349 | 807 | 0.3% |
| Videoarthroscope Hd 4mm X 30 Deg | 179 | 0 | 0% |
| 4k C-Mnt Scp 4 0 30 167 Mitek | 541 | 205 | 0% |
| Endoeye Flex Deflectable Videoscope | 8,062 | 2,245 | 0% |
| Bronchovideoscope | 1,924 | 938 | 0.1% |
| Single Use Suction Valve Sterile | 282 | 0 | 0% |
| Disposable Biopsy Forceps | 201 | 8 | 0% |
| Hd Epscp 4 0 30 167 Mitek | 575 | 27 | 0% |
| SINGLE USE BIOPSY VALVE (Sterile) | 293 | 130 | 0% |
| VISERA Pro VIDEO SYSTEM CENTER | 637 | 96 | 0% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."
Questions about Rhino-Laryngo Videoscope reports
How many FDA reports name Rhino-Laryngo Videoscope?
1,925 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 1,452 in the latest 12 months.
What kinds of events are reported?
malfunction (99.5%) and injury (0.5%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.
What device problems are coded?
detachment of device or device component (24.3%), failure to clean adequately (15.8%), device reprocessing problem (9.8%), peeled/delaminated (9%) and corroded (7.2%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.
Who files these reports?
manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.
Do these reports show that Rhino-Laryngo Videoscope was at fault?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."
How do I report a problem with a medical device?
Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.