Reported Reactions

Devices › Heart-valve, mechanical

Device brand name · Heart-valve mechanical

Regent Heart Valve with Flex Cuff: medical device reports filed with FDA

268 reports name it, 2022–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Abbott Medical. Product code LWQ.

268
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 63 a year
65
reports, 12 months to August 2026
54 in the 12 months before
66%
classified as malfunction
10.3% across the product code
5.2%
classified as death, as reported
14 reports · not verified by FDA

268 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Regent Heart Valve with Flex Cuff" (heart-valve mechanical); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Abbott Medical; received from April 2022 to August 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

65 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 20% from 54 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (66%), injury (28.7%) and death (5.2%); across all heart-valve, mechanical reports (product code LWQ) death is recorded in 12.7% and malfunction in 10.3%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are physical resistance/sticking (41.4%), incomplete coaptation (20.9%) and fracture (15.3%). The patient problems coded most often are aortic valve insufficiency/ regurgitation, heart failure/congestive heart failure and aortic valve stenosis. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

0713Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 0Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 1May 2022: 1Jun 2022: 4Jul 2022: 1Aug 2022: 2Sep 2022: 2Oct 2022: 10Nov 2022: 2Dec 2022: 32023Jan 2023: 5Feb 2023: 3Mar 2023: 9Apr 2023: 6May 2023: 6Jun 2023: 4Jul 2023: 10Aug 2023: 4Sep 2023: 8Oct 2023: 13Nov 2023: 7Dec 2023: 52024Jan 2024: 6Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 6Apr 2024: 3May 2024: 8Jun 2024: 4Jul 2024: 8Aug 2024: 8Sep 2024: 1Oct 2024: 4Nov 2024: 7Dec 2024: 42025Jan 2025: 2Feb 2025: 3Mar 2025: 5Apr 2025: 5May 2025: 5Jun 2025: 7Jul 2025: 9Aug 2025: 2Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 5Nov 2025: 5Dec 2025: 112026Jan 2026: 4Feb 2026: 4Mar 2026: 3Apr 2026: 6May 2026: 9Jun 2026: 6Jul 2026: 7Aug 2026: 5

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

040802022: 2620222023: 8020232024: 5920242025: 5920252026: 442026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death5.2%14
Injury28.7%77
Malfunction66%177
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%268
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 7,097 reports carrying product code LWQ. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Physical resistance/sticking11141.4%3%
Incomplete coaptation5620.9%5.2%
Fracturea broken bone4115.3%3.6%
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off3011.2%1.6%
Patient device interaction problem145.2%2.8%
Perivalvular leak93.4%4.8%
Intravalvular regurgitation83%0.7%
Device stenosis72.6%0.8%
Insufficient device problem information51.9%14.4%
Material split, cut or torn51.9%0.3%
Improper or incorrect procedure or method31.1%0.6%
Patient-device incompatibilitythe device did not suit the patient31.1%1.2%
Material frayed20.7%0%
Device damaged prior to receipt by user10.4%0%
Material separation10.4%1.1%
Off-label use10.4%0.2%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Aortic valve insufficiency/ regurgitation166%
Heart failure/congestive heart failure93.4%
Aortic valve stenosis62.2%
Dyspneashortness of breath51.9%
Arrhythmia41.5%
Stroke/cva31.1%
Angina20.7%
Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding20.7%
Obstruction/occlusion20.7%
Pneumonialung infection20.7%
Respiratory insufficiency20.7%
Thrombosis/thrombus20.7%
Ventricular fibrillationa chaotic rhythm from the lower heart chambers20.7%
Adult respiratory distress syndrome10.4%
Atrial fibrillationan irregular heart rhythm10.4%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureRegent Heart Valve with Flex CuffProduct code LWQAll MAUDE reports
Reports2687,09726,136,888
Share of that pool—3.8%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports521279
Classified as injury28.7%75.7%36.2%
Classified as malfunction66%10.3%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%92.6%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code LWQ

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Aortic Ap409442.7%
Standard Cuff329010.6%
Sjm Masters Series Mechanical Heart Valve259012.4%
Sjm Regent Heart Valve W/Flex Cuff246013%
Open Pivot Mechanical Heart Valve222125%
Medtronic Hall Prosthetic Heart Valve207019.8%
Sjm Mechanical Heart Valve17807.9%
Bjork-Shiley 60 Degree Convexo-Concave165027.3%
Trifecta2271158.8%
Mosaic Aortic Bioprosthetic Heart Valve3,4064052.8%
Trifecta Stented Tissue Valve29007.9%
Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Pericardial Bioprosthesis978110%
Shiley12,2361,5131.1%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Regent Heart Valve with Flex Cuff reports

How many FDA reports name Regent Heart Valve with Flex Cuff?

268 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 65 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (66%), injury (28.7%) and death (5.2%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

physical resistance/sticking (41.4%), incomplete coaptation (20.9%), fracture (15.3%), detachment of device or device component (11.2%) and patient device interaction problem (5.2%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Regent Heart Valve with Flex Cuff was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.