Reported Reactions

Devices › Implant, corneal, refractive

Device brand name · Corneal inlay

Raindrop Near Vision Inlay: medical device reports filed with FDA

206 reports name it, 2016–2018. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Revision Optics. Product code LQE.

206
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 21 a year
0
reports, 12 months to August 2026
0 in the 12 months before
15.5%
classified as malfunction
10.4% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

206 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Raindrop Near Vision Inlay" (corneal inlay); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Revision Optics; received from September 2016 to November 2018. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

0 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (84.5%) and malfunction (15.5%); across all implant, corneal, refractive reports (product code LQE) death is recorded in 0% and malfunction in 10.4%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are device dislodged or dislocated (31.1%), contamination (2.4%) and labelling, instructions for use or training problem (2.4%). The patient problems coded most often are loss of vision, corneal clouding/hazing and visual disturbances. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

No report naming Raindrop Near Vision Inlay was received in the five years to August 2026; the latest was received in November 2018.

By year received

0861712016: 1120162017: 17120172018: 242018

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury84.5%174
Malfunction15.5%32
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report96.1%198
Voluntary report3.9%8
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 335 reports carrying product code LQE. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Device dislodged or dislocated6431.1%20.3%
Contamination52.4%1.5%
Labelling, instructions for use or training problem52.4%1.5%
Biological environmental factor41.9%1.2%
Malposition of device21%1.2%
Positioning problem21%0.6%
Wrinkled21%0.9%
Device contamination with chemical or other material10.5%0.3%
Environmental particulates10.5%0.3%
Material fragmentation10.5%0.3%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Loss of vision8038.8%
Corneal clouding/hazing7837.9%
Visual disturbances3517%
Blurred vision178.3%
Halo146.8%
Visual impairmentreduced vision136.3%
Keratitis115.3%
Dry eye(s)94.4%
Corneal edema83.9%
Corneal scar83.9%
Inflammationinflammation83.9%
Corneal ulcer52.4%
Corneal abrasion41.9%
Foreign body sensation in eye31.5%
Tissue damage31.5%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureRaindrop Near Vision InlayProduct code LQEAll MAUDE reports
Reports20633526,136,888
Share of that pool—61.5%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports009
Classified as injury84.5%88.7%36.2%
Classified as malfunction15.5%10.4%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer96.1%85.4%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Questions about Raindrop Near Vision Inlay reports

How many FDA reports name Raindrop Near Vision Inlay?

206 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 0 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (84.5%) and malfunction (15.5%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

device dislodged or dislocated (31.1%), contamination (2.4%), labelling, instructions for use or training problem (2.4%), biological environmental factor (1.9%) and malposition of device (1%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (96.1%) and voluntary reports (3.9%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Raindrop Near Vision Inlay was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.