Device brand name · Hip instruments extraction instruments
Pinn Esc Liner Extractor Tip: medical device reports filed with FDA
159 reports name it, 2015–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Depuy Orthopaedics US. Product code HWB.
- 159
- device reports naming the brand
- 0% of all MAUDE reports · about 15 a year
- 19
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 17 in the 12 months before
- 100%
- classified as malfunction
- 93% across the product code
- 0%
- classified as death, as reported
- 0 reports · not verified by FDA
159 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Pinn Esc Liner Extractor Tip" (hip instruments extraction instruments); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Depuy Orthopaedics US; received from October 2015 to February 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.
19 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 12% from 17 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (100%); across all extractor reports (product code HWB) death is recorded in 0% and malfunction in 93%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.
The device problems coded most often are break (36.5%), material deformation (25.8%) and material twisted/bent (8.8%). FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
By year received
Event type and report source
Event type, as classified on the report
Who filed the report
Grey bar: all 3,519 reports carrying product code HWB. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share | Share across product code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breakthe device broke | 58 | 36.5% | 50.5% |
| Material deformation | 41 | 25.8% | 8% |
| Material twisted/bent | 14 | 8.8% | 7.4% |
| Bent | 3 | 1.9% | 1.4% |
| Crackthe device cracked | 2 | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Material integrity problema problem with the device material | 2 | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| Device issuea problem with the device | 1 | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Entrapment of device | 1 | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| Mechanical jam | 1 | 0.6% | 2.6% |
| Naturally worn | 1 | 0.6% | 4.7% |
| Physical resistance/sticking | 1 | 0.6% | 0.4% |
| Scratched material | 1 | 0.6% | 0.5% |
FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.
In context
| Measure | Pinn Esc Liner Extractor Tip | Product code HWB | All MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | 159 | 3,519 | 26,136,888 |
| Share of that pool | — | 4.5% | 0% |
| Classified as death, per 1,000 reports | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Classified as injury | 0% | 6.9% | 36.2% |
| Classified as malfunction | 100% | 93% | 62.3% |
| Filed by the manufacturer | 100% | 98.5% | 94.9% |
Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Other brands with product code HWB
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attune Tibial Trial Extractor | 447 | 22 | 0% |
| Pinn Poly Extractor | 308 | 23 | 0% |
| Reclaim Assem Upper Pull Rod | 199 | 13 | 0% |
| Attune Pin Puller | 171 | 17 | 0% |
| Dhs/Dcs Coupling Screw | 293 | 12 | 0% |
| Impactor F/Pfna Blade | 284 | 0 | 0% |
| ELEVATE Spinal System | 386 | 46 | 0% |
| Attune | 1,958 | 1,944 | 0% |
| Attune Rp Ps Artic Surf Sz7 | 282 | 22 | 0% |
| Discovery Elbow | 451 | 0 | 0% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."
Questions about Pinn Esc Liner Extractor Tip reports
How many FDA reports name Pinn Esc Liner Extractor Tip?
159 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 19 in the latest 12 months.
What kinds of events are reported?
malfunction (100%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.
What device problems are coded?
break (36.5%), material deformation (25.8%), material twisted/bent (8.8%), bent (1.9%) and crack (1.3%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.
Who files these reports?
manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.
Do these reports show that Pinn Esc Liner Extractor Tip was at fault?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."
How do I report a problem with a medical device?
Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.